11.08.2024 00:53, Franta Hanzl?k via samba wrote:> I have about the same crash on Fedora 40 x86_64/bind-9.18.28 and > Samba 4.20.4 (own build with internal Heimdal, as Fedora build it with > MIT Kerberos - which (IMO) not stable yet).What is not stable with mit-krb5 for you? Thanks, /mjt
On Sun, 11 Aug 2024 10:29:14 +0300 Michael Tokarev via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:> 11.08.2024 00:53, Franta Hanzl?k via samba wrote: > > > I have about the same crash on Fedora 40 x86_64/bind-9.18.28 and > > Samba 4.20.4 (own build with internal Heimdal, as Fedora build it > > with MIT Kerberos - which (IMO) not stable yet). > > What is not stable with mit-krb5 for you? > > Thanks, > > /mjt >I am also unsure just what is unstable with a MIT DC, but I am sure that using one is still experimental and should only be used in testing, if only Fedora would say this. Rowland
On Sun, 11 Aug 2024 10:29:14 +0300 Michael Tokarev <mjt at tls.msk.ru> wrote:> 11.08.2024 00:53, Franta Hanzl?k via samba wrote: > > > I have about the same crash on Fedora 40 x86_64/bind-9.18.28 and > > Samba 4.20.4 (own build with internal Heimdal, as Fedora build it with > > MIT Kerberos - which (IMO) not stable yet). > > What is not stable with mit-krb5 for you? > --Hello Michael, excuse for perhaps inaccurate statement - instead this should be rather 'experimental' and 'not for production use' as others wrote there. Unfortunately, my english is very bad and I express myself very briefly and often imprecisely. -- Franta Hanzl?k