similar to: leaving a domain?

20.06.2024 15:03, Michael Tokarev via samba ?????: > Hi! > > I joined a newly installed samba (4.20.1) server to a domain, - just testing > things.? Now I want to remove this test server from a domain, but I can't: > > > root at svdcm2:/# samba-tool domain leave -U tls\\mjt-adm > WARNING: Using passwords on command line is insecure. Installing the setproctitle python

On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 15:07:11 +0300 Michael Tokarev via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > 20.06.2024 15:03, Michael Tokarev via samba ?????: > > Hi! > > > > I joined a newly installed samba (4.20.1) server to a domain, - > > just testing things.? Now I want to remove this test server from a > > domain, but I can't: > > > > > >

20.06.2024 15:16, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 15:07:11 +0300 > Michael Tokarev via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> 20.06.2024 15:03, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote: >> Still, it'd be nice if samba-tool domain leave displayed some more >> appropriate error message, and no insecure-password-on-command-line >> warning

20.06.2024 17:01, Ralph Boehme wrote: > On 6/20/24 2:03 PM, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote: >> How to remove this machine from a domain? > net ads leave ... Yeah, I tried that one right after `samba-tool domain leave` - it complains there's no way to leave a domain if joined as a DC. I *guess* this is the error `samba-tool domain leave` faces too, just without proper error

On 6/20/24 2:03 PM, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote: > How to remove this machine from a domain? net ads leave ... -slow -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenPGP_signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 840 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL:

In the smbstatus output, "Locked files" section, there's a list of locked files (effectively opened files, since windows always locks a file which it opens) and corresponding pid of smbd process. How to map this information to user ID? Thanks, /mjt -- GPG Key transition (from rsa2048 to rsa4096) since 2024-04-24. New key: rsa4096/61AD3D98ECDF2C8E 9D8B E14E 3F2A 9DD7 9199 28F1

On Fri, 7 Jun 2024 08:50:11 +0200 "Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > on the problematic DC "systemctl status" doesn't even show > "samba-ad-dc". > > Although: > > # systemctl status samba-ad-dc.service > ? samba-ad-dc.service - LSB: Samba daemons for the AD DC > Loaded: loaded

07.06.2024 07:54, Jeremy Allison wrote: >> msdfs is broken in 4.19.? It worked fine in 4.18. This is not entirely true. >> Is no one using msdfs?? I wonder why I was the first to discover this? > > There must not be a test for your specific use-case. > > MSDFS is tested in the autobuild test suite. Can > you articulate the problem well enough we can > build a

On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 15:19:35 +0300 Michael Tokarev <mjt at tls.msk.ru> wrote: > 20.06.2024 15:16, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 15:07:11 +0300 > > Michael Tokarev via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >> 20.06.2024 15:03, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote: > > >> Still, it'd be nice if samba-tool domain

Hi! This is a heads-up for now, more debugging to follow. I had to downgrade samba from 4.20.1 to 4.19.6 because 4.20 broke case insensitive file access entirely. Only exact case filename works, no matter which value is set in "case sensitive" parameter. In 4.19, things works again. /mjt -- GPG Key transition (from rsa2048 to rsa4096) since 2024-04-24. New key:

08.07.2024 17:18, Sonic wrote: > On Mon, Jul 8, 2024 at 6:46?AM Michael Tokarev <mjt at tls.msk.ru> wrote: > ... >> I think the main ingredient here is to have apt-listchanges package >> installed (which, while part of standard install, is optional). > ... > > I've always installed using the netinstall.iso which does not install > that package. Will add it

Hi! For quite some time I'm trying to find what's going on with MSDFS referrals. Samba version is 4.19.6. We've global host msdfs = yes (the default anyway), and for a share in question, msdfs root = yes. testparam confirms the settings. There's a symlink created in the root dir of the share, which points to the same server but different path: dfstest =>

Am 07.06.24 um 08:45 schrieb Michael Tokarev: > Please check version of samba-ad-dc package, - is it the same as other > samba package versions? that package isn't installed according to "apt-cache policy" ! Seems it got lost while upgrading. > Did samba-ad-dc start at all? seemed like, but was very fast (so did nothing, as it seems) Did "apt install

Hi! I just uploaded binaries of samba versions 4.19.7-1 and 4.20.1-5 for ubuntu and debian to the usual location, http://www.corpit.ru/mjt/packages/samba/ . There are a few changes in there. First, I changed debian release suffix to be like: 4.20.1+dfsg-5~mjt-deb11 4.20.1+dfsg-5~mjt-ubt24 This should not change anything, just make it easier to track if neded, hopefully. And for 4.20

I run 2 DCs at a site, Debian 12.5, so far samba-4.19.6 from backports. Today I upgraded one of them, this brought samba-4.20.1 Now on this one DC stuff like "wbinfo -g" fails: # wbinfo -g could not obtain winbind interface details: WBC_ERR_WINBIND_NOT_AVAILABLE could not obtain winbind domain name! failed to call wbcListGroups: WBC_ERR_WINBIND_NOT_AVAILABLE Error looking up domain

Hi! In the samba wiki there's this page: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Raising_the_Functional_Levels which basically says that the maximum supported functional level is 2008_R2, and that 2012 (and 2012_R2) are included but not supported. This page mentions maximum samba version 4.4 and has been modified in 2017 (besides some formatting changes). What's the current situation? Also,

07.07.2024 16:05, Sonic via samba wrote: > On Fri, Jul 5, 2024 at 3:55?AM Michael Tokarev via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > ... >> Please don't suppress *NEWS* entries. > ... > > As someone that was bitten by this change I have to admit I've never > seen these NEWS entries, or never realized I had. My Debian servers > are cli only (no X or

I'm trying to build 4.21-rc packages for debian, and noticed that a new form of version info symbol appeared (only tried tdb for now). In addition to usual TDB.1.4.11 at TDB.1_4.11 symbol, it now also adds TDB_1_4_11 at TDB_1_4_11 (with dots replaced with underscores), but for single version only. It doesn't look right :) Thanks, /mjt -- GPG Key transition (from rsa2048 to

31.07.2024 08:30, Douglas Bagnall via samba ?????: > On 30/07/24 22:20, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote: >> When building libldb as public library, its install target does not >> install ldb_version.h header file, which is included from ldb.h, so >> the resulting header files are unusable. > > It may be that 625fb48326ec62a33ce0abdbfb0f6f3d33d7cc64 accidentally reversed

On 6/7/24 9:34 AM, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote: > I had to downgrade samba from 4.20.1 to 4.19.6 because 4.20 > broke case insensitive file access entirely.? Only exact case > filename works, no matter which value is set in "case sensitive" > parameter. hm, can't reproduce: $ bin/smbclient -U "slow%x" //localhost/test smb: \> ls foo foo N