similar to: [RFC PATCH 7/8] rust: add firmware abstractions

On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 03:33:39PM +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote: > On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 02:36:50PM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > Anyway, that's all hand-wavy right now, sorry, to get back to the point > > here, again, let's take this, which will allow the firmware bindings to > > be resubmitted and hopefully accepted, and we can move forward from > > there to

On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 09:11:32PM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 31 May 2024 11:59:47 +0200 > Danilo Krummrich <dakr at redhat.com> wrote: > > > Once we get to a conclusion I can send a series with only the device and firmare > > abstractions such that we can get them in outside of the scope of the reset of > > both series to get your

On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 02:36:50PM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > Anyway, that's all hand-wavy right now, sorry, to get back to the point > here, again, let's take this, which will allow the firmware bindings to > be resubmitted and hopefully accepted, and we can move forward from > there to "real" things like a USB or PCI or even platform device and > driver binding

On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 01:24:33PM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 30 May 2024 04:01:39 +0200 > Danilo Krummrich <dakr at redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 08:28:24AM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> On Wed, 29 May 2024 21:57:03 +0200 > >> Greg KH <gregkh at linuxfoundation.org>

On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 09:28:21AM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 28 May 2024 14:45:02 +0200 > Greg KH <gregkh at linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 02:19:24PM +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote: > >> However, if you have a driver that needs the firmware abstractions, I would be > >> surprised if there were any

On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 08:28:24AM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 29 May 2024 21:57:03 +0200 > Greg KH <gregkh at linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > >> For a Rust PHY driver, you know that you have a valid pointer to C's > >> device object of C's PHY device during the probe callback. The driver > >> creates a Rust device

On Sat, Jun 8, 2024 at 11:16?PM Asahi Lina <lina at asahilina.net> wrote: > > > > On 5/22/24 6:23 AM, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 07:20:50PM +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote: > >> From: Asahi Lina <lina at asahilina.net> > >> > >> Add abstractions for DRM drivers and devices. These go together in one > >> commit

Hi Lina, Welcome back! On Sun, Jun 09, 2024 at 02:15:57PM +0900, Asahi Lina wrote: > > > On 5/22/24 6:23 AM, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 07:20:50PM +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote: > >> From: Asahi Lina <lina at asahilina.net> > > This is missing an entry for DRIVER_GEM_GPUVA. And some others perhaps. > > I suppose some are legacy

On 1/9/24 10:59, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Mon, 08 Jan 2024, Danilo Krummrich <dakr at redhat.com> wrote: >> On 1/4/24 21:16, Jani Nikula wrote: >>> Including drm_edid.h from nouveau_connector.h causes the rebuild of 15 >>> files when drm_edid.h is modified, while there are only a few files that >>> actually need to include drm_edid.h. >>>

This used to be a single patch, but I split it into two with the addition of struct Scatterlist. Again a bit new with Rust submissions. I was told by Gary Guo to rebase on top of rust-next, but it seems *very* behind? The first patch does not build on its own due to a dead_code warning. It is hard to not have dead code when one is adding infrastructure to be used by others at a later

On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 10:14:19PM +0900, Hiroyuki Katsura wrote: >From: Hiroyuki_Katsura <hiroyuki.katsura.0513@gmail.com> > >--- > Makefile.am | 4 ++++ > configure.ac | 3 +++ > generator/Makefile.am | 3 +++ > generator/bindtests.ml | 3 +++ > generator/bindtests.mli | 1 + > generator/main.ml | 5 +++++ > generator/rust.ml

On Monday, 5 August 2019 08:59:31 CEST Hiroyuki Katsura wrote: > Without clarifying handle's lifetime, it is unable > to see how long the callbacks which the handle > owns will live. Then, Rust compiler will infer > that the callbacks have 'static lifetime. It is > not convenient for users. > --- My initial idea was to split the Handle -> Handle<'a> change

Including drm_edid.h from nouveau_connector.h causes the rebuild of 15 files when drm_edid.h is modified, while there are only a few files that actually need to include drm_edid.h. Cc: Karol Herbst <kherbst at redhat.com> Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com> Cc: Danilo Krummrich <dakr at redhat.com> Cc: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula

On 2/8/19 5:55 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > --- > +* Consider supporting a more idiomatic style for writing Rust plugins. > + Considering I've written nothing in Rust, I'm no good at deciding what forms idiomatic Rust plugins. > +++ b/configure.ac > @@ -545,6 +545,15 @@ AS_IF([test "x$OCAMLOPT" != "xno" && test "x$enable_ocaml" !=

Dear Richard, > We have tended to avoid this in other languages because the results > can be very poor quality (eg. swig bindings are usually terrible). > However if the resulting code from bindgen is high quality and > accurately covers all the features that libguestfs bindings need then > we can consider it. Thank you for your reply. Actually, I have not used bindgen and I

On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 01:05:58PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote: > On 8/16/19 1:01 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > > On 8/16/19 12:08 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > >> Implementing extents requires some coordination for the Rust code to > >> call back into libnbdkit; I'm not familiar with Rust enough to do > >> that. But with placeholders for those slots, implementing >

Hi, I'm now implementing generators of Rust, and I faced a problem. In order for the wrapper to 'understand' the struct passed from C API, it is required to incorporate the definition of the struct in C into Rust code. I have two approaches. 1. Create raw struct(#[repr(C)]), which has the equivalent memory mapping to C struct and access through this struct in Rust 2. Use bindgen to

On 8/16/19 12:08 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > Implementing extents requires some coordination for the Rust code to > call back into libnbdkit; I'm not familiar with Rust enough to do > that. But with placeholders for those slots, implementing > can_cache/cache is trivial. This improves the situation mentioned in > commit 031fae85. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Blake

In the last patch, I let the version of Rust bindings be the same as the version of libguestfs. However, I came to think it is not preferable in terms of the custom of Rust crate versioning. After a version of a crate is published to crates.io, no one can republish the crate with the same version. This means that when there are some mistakes in the rust bindings, after they are fixed, it is

On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 09:29:47AM -0500, Eric Blake wrote: > On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 04:13:36AM +0000, Tage Johansson wrote: > > It is possible to add a minimum version requirement in Cargo.toml, I guess I > > should do that to make the errors a bit more clear. > > It's okay if older platforms can't build Rust bindings, but anything > we can do to make it so that