Eric Blake
2019-Aug-16 18:01 UTC
Re: [Libguestfs] [nbdkit PATCH 1/2] rust: Implement can_cache
On 8/16/19 12:08 PM, Eric Blake wrote:> Implementing extents requires some coordination for the Rust code to > call back into libnbdkit; I'm not familiar with Rust enough to do > that. But with placeholders for those slots, implementing > can_cache/cache is trivial. This improves the situation mentioned in > commit 031fae85. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> > ---> +++ b/plugins/rust/src/lib.rs > @@ -93,6 +93,15 @@ pub struct Plugin { > pub magic_config_key: *const c_char, > > pub can_multi_conn: Option<extern fn (h: *mut c_void) -> c_int>, > + > + // Slots for extents functions, which needs more integration. > + _can_extents: Option<extern fn ()>, > + _extents: Option<extern fn ()>,Here, I was just copying what we had already done for the v1 fields that should remain unused (see above, in _pread_old for example). But is there a saner way to write a Rust struct that reserves the space required by the C ABI, but where the field MUST be left as NULL and not populated with Some(...) by the end user? Perhaps by marking the field const, while the rest of the struct is used as a mutable? (Doesn't change this patch, so much as a cleanup we could apply on top to prevent all of our _named fields from being overwritten after the initial construction with default values). And of course, if you want to actually implement extents, and figure out how to expose C-based nbdkit functions to be called by Rust code, be my guest (for .zero, we need nbdkit_set_error(), for extents, we need nbdkit_add_extent(), and then we have several other utility functions like nbdkit_realpath() that could be useful). -- Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3226 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
Eric Blake
2019-Aug-16 18:05 UTC
Re: [Libguestfs] [nbdkit PATCH 1/2] rust: Implement can_cache
On 8/16/19 1:01 PM, Eric Blake wrote:> On 8/16/19 12:08 PM, Eric Blake wrote: >> Implementing extents requires some coordination for the Rust code to >> call back into libnbdkit; I'm not familiar with Rust enough to do >> that. But with placeholders for those slots, implementing >> can_cache/cache is trivial. This improves the situation mentioned in >> commit 031fae85. >> >> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> >> ---> And of course, if you want to actually implement extents, and figure out > how to expose C-based nbdkit functions to be called by Rust code, be my > guest (for .zero, we need nbdkit_set_error(), for extents, we need > nbdkit_add_extent(), and then we have several other utility functions > like nbdkit_realpath() that could be useful).Also, we are lacking a tests/*rust* usage; it would be nice if 'make check' covered a Rust plugin (more than just running 'nbdkit plugins/rust/target/release/examples/libramdisk.so'). -- Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3226 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
Richard W.M. Jones
2019-Aug-16 19:15 UTC
Re: [Libguestfs] [nbdkit PATCH 1/2] rust: Implement can_cache
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 01:05:58PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:> On 8/16/19 1:01 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > > On 8/16/19 12:08 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > >> Implementing extents requires some coordination for the Rust code to > >> call back into libnbdkit; I'm not familiar with Rust enough to do > >> that. But with placeholders for those slots, implementing > >> can_cache/cache is trivial. This improves the situation mentioned in > >> commit 031fae85. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> > >> --- > > > And of course, if you want to actually implement extents, and figure out > > how to expose C-based nbdkit functions to be called by Rust code, be my > > guest (for .zero, we need nbdkit_set_error(), for extents, we need > > nbdkit_add_extent(), and then we have several other utility functions > > like nbdkit_realpath() that could be useful). > > Also, we are lacking a tests/*rust* usage; it would be nice if 'make > check' covered a Rust plugin (more than just running 'nbdkit > plugins/rust/target/release/examples/libramdisk.so').We certainly do need tests for the Rust plugin. Actually placing them in tests/ might be difficult because Rust assumes a build environment (called cargo) and that requires a bunch of files. Since we already have cargo files it's probably better to put the tests for this plugin next to the plugin. Unfortunately an additional complication is that we probably can't use the tests facility of cargo because we need to go through building a shared library and running it under the nbdkit wrapper. Perhaps we can add them as further examples and wire up 'make check' to run them? It's not especially elegant but here we are. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines. Tiny program with many powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc. http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top
Possibly Parallel Threads
- Re: [nbdkit PATCH 1/2] rust: Implement can_cache
- Re: [nbdkit PATCH 1/2] rust: Implement can_cache
- [nbdkit PATCH 0/2] rust: Implement some missing v2 callbacks
- [nbdkit PATCH 1/2] rust: Implement can_cache
- [PATCH nbdkit] Add support for writing plugins in Rust.