similar to: SAMBA_VERSION_VENDOR_SUFFIX in VERSION

With the new signature file I was able to verify, but there was still a bad signature: "gpg: key 0x0FC3042E345AD05D: 1 bad signature" which I highlighted below. Didn't seem to be a problem, but thought I'd point it out. I'd be glad to do additional tests if you'd like. $ gpg --list-keys /home/wink/.gnupg/pubring.kbx ----------------------------- pub

In the smbstatus output, "Locked files" section, there's a list of locked files (effectively opened files, since windows always locks a file which it opens) and corresponding pid of smbd process. How to map this information to user ID? Thanks, /mjt -- GPG Key transition (from rsa2048 to rsa4096) since 2024-04-24. New key: rsa4096/61AD3D98ECDF2C8E 9D8B E14E 3F2A 9DD7 9199 28F1

I'm on an Arch Linux system: $ uname -a Linux wink-desktop 5.0.4-arch1-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Sat Mar 23 21:00:33 UTC 2019 x86_64 GNU/Linux My gpg version is: $ gpg --version gpg (GnuPG) 2.2.15 libgcrypt 1.8.4 Copyright (C) 2019 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later < https://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html> This is free software: you are free to change and

07.06.2024 07:54, Jeremy Allison wrote: >> msdfs is broken in 4.19.? It worked fine in 4.18. This is not entirely true. >> Is no one using msdfs?? I wonder why I was the first to discover this? > > There must not be a test for your specific use-case. > > MSDFS is tested in the autobuild test suite. Can > you articulate the problem well enough we can > build a

Hi! I joined a newly installed samba (4.20.1) server to a domain, - just testing things. Now I want to remove this test server from a domain, but I can't: root at svdcm2:/# samba-tool domain leave -U tls\\mjt-adm WARNING: Using passwords on command line is insecure. Installing the setproctitle python module will hide these from shortly after program start. Password for [TLS\mjt-adm]:

On 26/05/24 03:00, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote: > There's also /usr/sbin/samba_kcc in there, - should go either to samba-ad-client > or samba-ad-dc, I can't understand which one. samba-ad-dc. It is called by the server. >> BTW, do we really need samba_downgrade_db these days?? Changing format to the >> one used by samba 4.7, srsly?? I'd just remove this one :)

Am 07.06.24 um 08:45 schrieb Michael Tokarev: > Please check version of samba-ad-dc package, - is it the same as other > samba package versions? that package isn't installed according to "apt-cache policy" ! Seems it got lost while upgrading. > Did samba-ad-dc start at all? seemed like, but was very fast (so did nothing, as it seems) Did "apt install

On 07-06-2024 06:59, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote: > 07.06.2024 07:54, Jeremy Allison wrote: >>> msdfs is broken in 4.19.? It worked fine in 4.18. > > This is not entirely true. > >>> Is no one using msdfs?? I wonder why I was the first to discover this? >> >> There must not be a test for your specific use-case. >> >> MSDFS is tested in the

On 6/7/24 9:34 AM, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote: > I had to downgrade samba from 4.20.1 to 4.19.6 because 4.20 > broke case insensitive file access entirely.? Only exact case > filename works, no matter which value is set in "case sensitive" > parameter. hm, can't reproduce: $ bin/smbclient -U "slow%x" //localhost/test smb: \> ls foo foo N

On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 11:54:28AM +0300, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote: >07.06.2024 10:13, Kees van Vloten via samba wrote: > >>There is a little difference with your config: I am not using >>symlinks in the filesystem but 'msdfs proxy' in smb.conf.? Not sure >>if that can be related to your finding? > >msdfs proxy is not affected in this context. It is

On 6/20/24 2:03 PM, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote: > How to remove this machine from a domain? net ads leave ... -slow -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenPGP_signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 840 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL:

On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 15:19:35 +0300 Michael Tokarev <mjt at tls.msk.ru> wrote: > 20.06.2024 15:16, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 15:07:11 +0300 > > Michael Tokarev via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >> 20.06.2024 15:03, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote: > > >> Still, it'd be nice if samba-tool domain

On Thu, 2 May 2024 13:44:47 +0300 Michael Tokarev via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi! > > In packaging/systemd/winbind.service, there's this ordering: > > After=network.target nmb.service > > Does winbind really need nmbd running? Well, no and yes ;-) No, if you are running Samba as an AD Unix domain member without SMBv1 (in which case, you do not

On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 07:16:06AM +0300, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote: >06.06.2024 19:33, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote: > >>For quite some time I'm trying to find what's going on with MSDFS referrals. >>Samba version is 4.19.6. >.. >>However, when opening the directory in question from client, this name is not >>shown in the listing.? Samba skips

On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 15:07:11 +0300 Michael Tokarev via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > 20.06.2024 15:03, Michael Tokarev via samba ?????: > > Hi! > > > > I joined a newly installed samba (4.20.1) server to a domain, - > > just testing things.? Now I want to remove this test server from a > > domain, but I can't: > > > > > >

On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 04:59:29PM +0300, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote: >07.06.2024 16:57, Michael Tokarev wrote: >>It boils down to having wide links = yes (and wide links = no). > >It boils down to having wide links = yes (and UNIX EXTENSIONS = no) :) Wide links is problematic. I'd love to just remove it :-).

Hi! For quite some time I'm trying to find what's going on with MSDFS referrals. Samba version is 4.19.6. We've global host msdfs = yes (the default anyway), and for a share in question, msdfs root = yes. testparam confirms the settings. There's a symlink created in the root dir of the share, which points to the same server but different path: dfstest =>

On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 08:21:26PM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote: >But samba applies too much smartness here and breaks things badly. Fair enough. Can you post a minimal smb.conf and directory setup that reproduces the problem and how to demo it with smbclient command lines please ? I know I'm asking to be spoon-fed but my time for Samba these days is quite limited and this would aid

I run 2 DCs at a site, Debian 12.5, so far samba-4.19.6 from backports. Today I upgraded one of them, this brought samba-4.20.1 Now on this one DC stuff like "wbinfo -g" fails: # wbinfo -g could not obtain winbind interface details: WBC_ERR_WINBIND_NOT_AVAILABLE could not obtain winbind domain name! failed to call wbcListGroups: WBC_ERR_WINBIND_NOT_AVAILABLE Error looking up domain

Using latest samba 4.20.2 from Debian Trixie repositories, the latest bind9 upgrade to version 9.19.24 fails to start on DC's using dlz_bind.? Reverting back to bind9 9.19.21 restores full functionality.? On standalone systems running the same samba version with the latest bind9, named starts with no issues. The most recent dlz_bind version available is dlz_bind9_18.so. Since the kernel