similar to: file sharing using native NFS4 ACLs on Linux

Le mer. 15 mai 2024 ? 12:32, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> a ?crit : > On Wed, 15 May 2024 10:36:03 +0200 > mathias dufresne via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > Is it possible on Linux systems to share through SMB managed by Samba > > some NFS4 mounted FS and that Samba is using NFS4 ACLs only?

On Wed, 15 May 2024 13:02:24 +0200 mathias dufresne via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Le mer. 15 mai 2024 ? 12:32, Rowland Penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> a ?crit : > > > On Wed, 15 May 2024 10:36:03 +0200 > > mathias dufresne via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > >

On Wed, 15 May 2024 10:36:03 +0200 mathias dufresne via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Is it possible on Linux systems to share through SMB managed by Samba > some NFS4 mounted FS and that Samba is using NFS4 ACLs only? Re sharing an NFS filesystem by Samba isn't a good idea. > > The point would be to not store anything on Samba

Hi everyone We're really struggling with nfs4 <--> windows acls. Scenario Samba4 share --> cifs --> win7. No problem Samba4 share --> nfs4 --> Linux. acls not inherited Neither is there inheritance vica versa. e.g. It is not possible to create files with group rw on a umask 0022 nfs4 share. nfs4_setfacl cannot override umask. Using POSIX or windows acls this works

Hi, After more investigations I'm now believing that we have some issue on our AD site declaration. I'll be back once I would have get more information. Best regards, M. Le jeu. 8 nov. 2018 à 11:22, mathias dufresne <infractory at gmail.com> a écrit : > Hi all, > > AD version is MS 2008R2. > > smb.conf is : > [global] > workgroup = AD > security = ADS

On Wed, 5 Oct 2016 12:04:53 +0200 mathias dufresne via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I just tested on some DC running also 4.4.5 and "getent group > my_group" does not show groups content. > > I read here > http://serverfault.com/questions/625416/samba-4-group-members-not-shown-in-getent-group > a proposal to use samba-tool as a replacement but

On 16/11/15 14:33, mathias dufresne wrote: > Another error coming often: > [2015/11/16 15:11:07.592598, 0] > ../source4/librpc/rpc/dcerpc_util.c:745(dcerpc_pipe_auth_recv) > Failed to bind to uuid e3514235-4b06-11d1-ab04-00c04fc2dcd2 for >

All DC are running same Samba version : 4.4.2. All DC are hosted on same Centos 7. On broken server(s): wbinfo -i mdufresne failed to call wbcGetpwnam: WBC_ERR_DOMAIN_NOT_FOUND Could not get info for user mdufresne On working servers: wbinfo -i mdufresne AD.DOMAIN\mdufresne:*:12104:100:Mathias Dufresne (TEMP):/home/AD.DGFIP/mdufresne:/bin/false The smb.conf is:

On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 16:27:12 +0200 mathias dufresne <infractory at gmail.com> wrote: > PS: the short way to explain %u is adding domain/workgroup to > username is the fact we are using trust relationship? > Probably, what you have to get your head around is this: The users 'fred', 'DOMAINA\fred' and 'DOMAINB\fred' are all different users. Winbind will

On 16/11/15 15:09, mathias dufresne wrote: > That did not work. I've added DNS entries mentioned in that wiki page. I > also forced creation of all entries mentioned by samba_dnsupdate > --all-names --verbose. > So I expect all needed DNS entries are present. If some are still missing > they are not mentioned by samba_dnsupdate. And as samba_dnsupdate job is to > create

Read wasn't the question. Question was about removing children but not the parent. parent-folder -> not removable |_ Children1 -> |_ Children2 -> both removable I don't know how Samba deal with that, but that's not the point for now. For now you have to understand NTFS permissions a little bit (I have not the knowledge to write something like a lesson about NTFS

Hi Rowland, Thank you for your reply. I'll provide these information but for now I'm suspecting Samba and others things could be installed in a strange manner. I have to check that first... Best regards, mathias Le mar. 6 nov. 2018 à 10:36, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> a écrit : > On Tue, 6 Nov 2018 10:16:26 +0100 > mathias dufresne via samba

If my messages seems somehow unreadable - I sent it from Gmail Web UI. mathias dufresne, read my 2 or 3 last messages. I wrote about mounting \\server\share as disk and risky fo viruses crypting files. Also read messages other, who does not work in AirBus. And more over, it' s your oppinion. But I see useless of more discussion at atll. If you want to combine your efforts to help with

On 27 January 2016 at 17:40, mathias dufresne <infractory at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Samba DC generates a krb5.conf into private directory, where the database > is hold. > > Its content should be that: > [libdefaults] > default_realm = SAMBA.DOMAIN.TLD > dns_lookup_realm = false > dns_lookup_kdc = true > > Should only as I get

Once more, my bad : ) I'm using Ext4 file system, so no limitation from there (or missed something) 2015-06-01 15:12 GMT+02:00 S?bastien Le Ray <sebastien-samba at orniz.org>: > Hi, > > Is there any possibility that you're using a filesystem which such > limitations? > > Regards > > > Le 01/06/2015 15:11, mathias dufresne a ?crit : > >> Hi,

2017-08-30 16:15 GMT+02:00 mathias dufresne <infractory at gmail.com>: > > > 2017-08-30 16:05 GMT+02:00 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> > : > >> On Wed, 30 Aug 2017 15:01:05 +0200 >> "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> >> > Small addition. >> > >> > > have in

2016-10-19 8:56 GMT+02:00 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 08:47:25 +0200 > mathias dufresne <infractory at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > The domain member will ask its nameserver (which should be an AD > > > DC), > > > > > > > The client send request to its resolver, which

You do what you want! The point is the clients must resolve everything. You have two options: A - client resolver is non-DC DNS server: here the non-DC DNS server must be configured to forward DNS requests about AD to AD DNS servers (to DCs) B - client resolver is AD DNS server: here AD DNS server(s) used as resolver(s) must be configured to forward any non-AD DNS request to non-DC DNS server.

I try to set up a Samba4-based Fileserver in an Samba3-DC enviroment. Filesystem is ext4, CIFS + NFS4 should be provided. The same ACLs should be used over both protocols. With Samba 3 this was possible (using POSIX 1003.1e DRAFT 17 ACLs only) . How can I do the same with Samba 4 ? Posix-ACLs set on the server with setfacl are recogniced on a windows-client. But every change I do on a

PS: I could share information about what should be modified to modify the very same GPO, I didn't yet as I'm not sure anyone there would be interested and because that would work only for that kind of GPO. 2016-07-06 17:08 GMT+02:00 mathias dufresne <infractory at gmail.com>: > Context: several teams have to manage only a a bunch of the company's > computers, so these