similar to: [Bug 1751] New: ip6tables-restore doesn't restore counters

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1735 Bug ID: 1735 Summary: Adding nftables interval sets progressively gets slower and makes the nft CLI less responsive with each added set Product: nftables Version: 1.0.x Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity:

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1751 Summary: ssh-add -s /usr/lib/opensc-pkcs11.so does not work Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.4p1 Platform: amd64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Smartcard AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org

How hard is to setup Cisco 1751 w/2x FXO with asterisk? I was googling but couldn't find much information; how to access unit interface for programming? It might be a good replacement for Linksys. -- Joseph

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:1751 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1751.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 84130aca6ddd9a6f49ac4b4522982d3b0fd4aa09e12669cbec3b55a63a1e38ff openssl-1.0.1e-16.el6_5.i686.rpm

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1186 Bug ID: 1186 Summary: ip6tables-restore not passing useful error messages from ip6tables Product: iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Ubuntu Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component:

Hi list! I am configuring Shorewall on a Xen domU virtual machine. I configured only the zones, interfaces, rules, policy and shorewall.conf files. When I run "shorewall check" there aren''t no problems, but when I try to start shorewall I get this error a lot of time: iptables: Invalid argument ip6tables v1.3.6: can''t initialize ip6tables table `filter'': Bad

I have 2 boxes that act as IPv6 routers. One with 2 physical interfaces, the other with 6 vlan ''interfaces'' on one physical interface plus a second physical interface. On both systems I have in /etc/sysconfig/network IPV6FORWARDING=yes But if I have my ''basic'' ip6tables service running, only ICMP messages get through. Since both of these boxes are

Hiyas, Is there a patch for the 2.4.x series to do ip6tables bridging of IPv6 packets? I was unable to go to 2.6 due to issues with large packets so still living in 2.4 land. If there are no patches, any ideas on what gets patched in IPv4 to allow this bridging? -Scott __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!

Hi I have an old server running centos 4.9 and recently I added ipv6 connectivity to it, however I wanted to use iptables to restrict access like im doing over ipv4. I tried using yum to install ip6tables but that's not available on the repo. I'm trying to figure out what my options are, how do you guys recommend I go about installing ip6tables. I guess I could upgrade the server from 4.9

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID ------- Additional Comments From

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103 Summary: ip6tables -L does not separate address and mask if mask is odd Product: iptables userspace Version: 1.2.8 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P2 Component: ip6tables

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=451 Summary: ip6tables port range support in multiport modules is broken Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: i386 OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ip6tables

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=451 netfilter@linuxace.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |netfilter@linuxace.com ------- Additional Comments From netfilter@linuxace.com 2006-02-18 19:35 MET ------- Which

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=548 ------- Additional Comments From michal@logix.cz 2007-02-25 23:31 MET ------- For the record, the command is "ip6tables ... -p icmp". Just in case someone changes the Summary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=812 Florian Westphal <fw at strlen.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fw at strlen.de --- Comment #1 from Florian Westphal <fw at strlen.de> 2013-04-21 16:48:04 CEST ---

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=812 Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |netfilter at linuxace.com Resolution|

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=892 Summary: ip6tables --match policy needs to accept IPv4 addresses for --tunnel-src and --tunnel-dst Product: iptables Version: 1.4.x Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: ip6tables

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=940 Summary: ip6tables-save output invalid rule when using D/SNPT Product: iptables Version: 1.4.x Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: ip6tables AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1015 scott.nolin at ssec.wisc.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |scott.nolin at ssec.wisc.edu -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. -------------- next