similar to: Synthetic Control Method

Hi, I've installed the igraph package and have been otherwise using it successfully, but when I try to use graph.bfs I get the error: could not find function "graph.bfs" Moreover, I don't seem to have the documentation installed either. (per ?graph.bfs and ??graph.bfs). I'm using RStudio v0.95.262 on windows 7. Below is the info for my R build: R version 2.14.0

my problem actually arised with fitting the data to the weibulldistribution, where it is hard to see, if the proposed parameterestimates make sense. data1:2743;4678;21427;6194;10286;1505;12811;2161;6853;2625;14542;694;11491; ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? 14924;28640;17097;2136;5308;3477;91301;11488;3860;64114;14334 how am I supposed to know what starting values i have to take? i get different

hello! i don't want to test my sample data for normality, but exponential- lognormal- or gammadistribution. as i've learnt the anderson-darling-test in R is only for normality and i am not supposed to use the kolmogorov-smirnov test of R for parameter estimates from sample data, is that true? can you help me, how to do this anyway! thank you very much! nadja

The current btrfs support did not handled multiple stripes stored in chunk items, hence skipping the physical addresses that were needed to do the mapping. Besides, the chunk tree may contain DEV_ITEM keys which store information on all of the underlying block devices, so we must skip them instead of finishing lookup. The bug was reproduced with btrfs-progs v4.2.2. Cc: Gene Cumm <gene.cumm

hello my data is data2:2743 4678 21427 6194 10286 1505 12811 2161 6853 2625 14542 694 11491 14924 28640 17097 2136 5308 3477 91301 11488 3860 64114 14334 by calculating shape<-(mean(data2))^2/var(data2) scale<-var(data2)/mean(data2) i get the idea what the parameters of the gammadistribution would be. but if i try using the method mle() i get stock and i don't know, how to

On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 5:03 PM Rowland penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 21/10/2019 15:47, Thomas Schweikle via samba wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Samba server set up for domain rufus.ada.de a proxy is reachable in > > proxy.ada.de. > > How are you running Samba ? > As ADDC. Please post your smb.conf. > OK. Here it is: [global]

On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 5:07 PM Rowland penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 22/10/2019 15:52, Thomas Schweikle wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 5:03 PM Rowland penny via samba > > <samba at lists.samba.org <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>> wrote: > > > > On 21/10/2019 15:47, Thomas Schweikle via samba wrote: >

I can''t find network device in domU. Debian domU shows Configuring network interfaces...SIOCSIFADDR: No such device eth0: ERROR while getting interface flags: No such device and Fedora domU shows: eth0: unknown interface: No such device Dom0 is using Fedora with: kernel-xen-guest.i686 2.6.15-1.29_FC5 installed kernel-xen-hypervisor.i686

Dear all I've got the dataset data:2743;4678;21427;6194;10286;1505;12811;2161;6853;2625;14542;694;11491; ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? 14924;28640;17097;2136;5308;3477;91301;11488;3860;64114;14334 I know from other testing that it should be possible to fit the data with the exponentialdistribution. I tried to get parameterestimates for the exponentialdistribution with R, but as the values of the parameter

At least in this test-case, the "bitfield" part of this seems to be a distraction. As Eli notes, Clang has lowered the function to LLVM IR containing consistent i16 operations. Despite that being a different choice from GCC, it should still be correct and consistent. Of course that insight does mean it's quite easy to create a test-case with the exact same problematic store->load

Here is what I am trying to accomplish: I want to create a share that will force users to a ID and group, allow certain users write privileges to certain directories only and others read only. I have set this up and every time I create a file the owner is set to root and the group is correct. Any help would be great, the following is what I have in the smb.conf file: [migrate] path =

hello everybody i want to use the maximum likelihood method to estimate FRECHET parameters of my sample data. Should it work with fitdistr in the package MASS? I only find how to do it for GEV, Gumbel, and almost all other distributions, but FRECHET? I would be very happy if somebody can tell me how to do fit the FRECHET distribution! Thanks Nadja Riedwyl

Hello I use XEN 3.0 in debian sarge. I have a domU1 for routing and firewall. This domU1 use 2 network interfaces which is on a bridge ''gate'' and the other on bridge ''lan''. dumU2 use one interface (eth0) on bridge ''lan''. Then I make a ping out of domU2 to www.debian.de so I get no answer. The name isn''t resolved. A ping to IP of

On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 04:39:04PM -0700, Rui Ueyama wrote: > I don't want to make Resolver to have a reference to input graph. The point > of this proposal is to separate input graph handling from Resolver and > instead making Linker Context to do that task. That was the part of the original proposal I didn't agree with and I still don't do. While the resolver shouldn't

On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Nick Kledzik <kledzik at apple.com> wrote: > > On Sep 20, 2013, at 3:37 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Nick Kledzik <kledzik at apple.com> wrote: > >> Rui, >> >> I like this in general, but have a few questions. >> >> On Sep 20, 2013, at 2:30 PM, Rui

Hello. I am hoping someone can help with a problem I am having. I am running the Windows folding at home client through wine. This app is very load intensive and performs many scientific calculations. It consumes 100% of all six cores in my system. However, I run it with a "nice" level of 19 so that it only uses idle cycles. Unfortunately, with this setup, my system consistently

On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 7:32 PM John McCall via cfe-dev < cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 26 May 2020, at 18:28, Bill Wendling via llvm-dev wrote: > > [...] The store is a byte: > > > > orb $0x1,0x4a(%rbx) > > > > while the read is a word: > > > > movzwl 0x4a(%r12),%r15d > > > > The problem is that between the store

Hi, when mounting an intentionally corrupted btrfs filesystem i get the following warning and bug message. The image can be found here www.cccmz.de/~snakebyte/btrfs.2.img.bck.bz2 [ 297.406152] device fsid e14cf01de423381a-4bd40b603870018a <6>devid 2147483649 transid 9 /dev/loop0 [ 297.411937] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 297.412207] WARNING: at fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:805

Hello, I was wondering whether or not some behaviour that I am seeing is expected behaviour and that it has been designed like this, or not. A dominator relation is given by "if A dominates B", then all paths to B go through A. For example, take the CFG below (which is a directed graph (couldn’t make the arrow heads but ok.): A / \ B C \ / D | E We can construct

2012/8/25 Iaroslav Markov <ymarkov at cs.stonybrook.edu>: > Can't you do it by performing some analysis on CFG? You can traverse that structure with BFS. And after that for all the BB you have visited more than once, you try to find a parent that has a branch instruction as a terminator. Additionally you ensure that there are no BB with branches as terminators on your way. If such