similar to: Upgrade to 4.20: Not resetting nTSecurityDescriptor

On Fri, 2024-04-12 at 08:03 +0200, Daniel M?ller via samba wrote: > Hello to all, > > After updating to samba 4.20 (from samba 4.19) on Debian 11, samba-tool > dbcheck --cross-ncs > results in: > samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs > Checking 4499 objects > Not resetting nTSecurityDescriptor on CN=Deleted > Objects,CN=Configuration,DC=tlk,DC=loc > Not resetting

I did it: root at dom2:~# samba-tool dbcheck --fix Checking 705 objects Reset nTSecurityDescriptor on CN=Deleted Objects,DC=tlk,DC=loc back to provision default? Owner mismatch: SY (in ref) DA(in current) Group mismatch: SY (in ref) DA(in current) Part dacl is different between reference and current here is the detail:

root at dom2:~# samba-tool dbcheck --fix --yes Checking 705 objects Checked 705 objects (0 errors) root at dom2:~# samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs Checking 4506 objects Not resetting nTSecurityDescriptor on CN=Deleted Objects,CN=Configuration,DC=tlk,DC=loc Not resetting nTSecurityDescriptor on CN=Deleted Objects,DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=tlk,DC=loc Not resetting nTSecurityDescriptor on CN=Deleted

On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 07:53:16 +0200 Daniel M?ller via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I did it: > root at dom2:~# samba-tool dbcheck --fix > Checking 705 objects > Reset nTSecurityDescriptor on CN=Deleted Objects,DC=tlk,DC=loc back > to provision default? Owner > mismatch: SY (in ref) DA(in current) Group mismatch: SY (in ref)

Hi, I have a samba 4.7.9 DC that I am trying to remove a windows SBS dc from. In doing this I have run across several problems. For whatever reason when I try to dcpromo the windows DC it fails because it says it cannot contact the samba4 DC. I have checked replication as per https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Verifying_the_Directory_Replication_Statuses All of the tests pass. Since we are going

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.19 release series. It contains the security-relevant bug CVE-2018-14628: ??? Wrong ntSecurityDescriptor values for "CN=Deleted Objects" ??? allow read of object tombstones over LDAP ??? (Administrator action required!) ??? https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2018-14628.html

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.19 release series. It contains the security-relevant bug CVE-2018-14628: ??? Wrong ntSecurityDescriptor values for "CN=Deleted Objects" ??? allow read of object tombstones over LDAP ??? (Administrator action required!) ??? https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2018-14628.html

On Mon, 2023-11-27 at 13:27 +0100, Jule Anger via samba wrote: > Release Announcements > --------------------- > > This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.19 release series. > It contains the security-relevant bug CVE-2018-14628: > > ???? Wrong ntSecurityDescriptor values for "CN=Deleted Objects" > ???? allow read of object tombstones over LDAP >

Hi, I updated my two samba DC's from 4.0.3 to serner 4.0.7. Both servers run debian wheezy and the add was created at the beginning of the year with an classic upgrade to version 4.0.0. Recent release notes do not provide information about required upgrade tasks. So i ran. samba-tool dbcheck --reset-well-known-acls. On the first DC it found a few errors about missong members in computer

Hello, Today I tried to upgrade from samba 4.0.0 to 4.0.3 on my test environment. I patched the source with the diffs patch-4.0.0-4.0.1.diffs, patch-4.0.1-4.0.2.diffs, patch-4.0.2-4.0.3.diffs , then make, make install. # samba-tool dbcheck Checking 807 objects Not fixing nTSecurityDescriptor on CN=Performance Monitor Users,CN=Builtin,DC=inview,DC=local <--- all errors were

On Fri, 6 Sep 2019, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 06/09/2019 17:05, Tom Diehl via samba wrote: >> Hi Louis, >> >> On Fri, 6 Sep 2019, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: >> >>> Hai, >>> >>> Try the script, make backups of you sysvol first. >>> >>> The script shows the correct settings, these are duplicated from a

Hi Tim and Rowland, thanks for Your support! I was thinking about e.g. Python 2.7.15 compatibility (as newer Samba versions require Python3), but You are right, here in DB can be problem - first Samba AD DC was created by migrating Samba3 NT4 domain to Samba4 AD cca week ago (using 'samba-tool domain classicupgrade ...', according to Samba Wiki): On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 10:14:02 +1300 Tim

Hello, Is it necessary or recommended to run 'samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix' and 'samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset' when upgrading from 4.0.0 to 4.0.3?

I'm upgrading an old samba4 instance (Samba version: 4.3.0pre1-GIT-1e32ada) which despite it's age works fine. Running 'samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs' before the upgrade results in no errors. Building and installing using samba-4.7.3.tar.gz source (same ./configure) and the running 'samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs' results in 'Checked 3994 objects (4367

Hi, Have changed the subject line to make my question clearer :) What is the expected behaviour of 'samba-tool dbcheck --fix'? Should running this command two times still produce the same output? I think I was bitten by bug 13228, but am not sure if I'm running the right command to resolve. Cheers Jonathan On 7 February 2018 at 23:44, Jonathan Hunter <jmhunter1 at

I have setup an samba 4 AD DC. The Domain Administrator SAMDOM\Administrator can't create GPO (access denied). SAMDOM\Administrator is member of Domain Admins group. I have try samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --reset-well-known-acls --fix samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix without success.

Hi everybody! I have two samba AD server ( 4.2.7-SerNet-Debian-8.wheezy ). I try to make gpo working but I'm facing some problems... My Samba4 comes from an old windows AD so I have launch these command : samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --reset-well-known-acls --fix samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset ( that take about 10 minutes to complete ) samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix But the

Hi, dbcheck tells us we have two "dangling forward links" that I am trying to get rid of. On my test domain, I have simply done ldbedit -e nano -H ./CN=CONFIGURATION,DC=SAMBA,DC=COMPANY,DC=COM to remove them. While that seems to have worked nicely, dbcheck report zero errors now, it is something that I should never have done, or do in production, according to Andrew: "We

Hello all; I use CentOS 7.5.1804 I update from samba-4.8.2 to samba-4.9.1 and finish with not errors, but when I run samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs I have the error: [root at gtmad ~]# samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs Checking 4087 objects ERROR(<type 'exceptions.UnicodeEncodeError'>): uncaught exception - 'ascii' codec can't encode character u'\xe9' in

The morning I ran "samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs" and found 10 errors on the DC with the FSMO roles. (Checked the other DC and found the same 10 errors.) When I run "samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix" I am being asked to "y|N|all|none" questions and not sure what my reply needs to be. Two Samba 4.5.0 as ADDC's on Ubuntu 16.04LTS. (If that matters.) The