similar to: fxp performance with POLLING

My backup script split filesystem dumps to files with size of 4,37 GB (4 588 544 kB). It's just an optimal size to fill out DVDs. At this moment I have to burn them from windows via smb-link becuase I didn't manage to do this task from FreeBSD console due to 2GB/4GB filesize restrictions (growisofs). I'm using freeware CDBurnerXP to burn my backups (ISO9660/UDF/Joliet), and they

hail, I have an old AthlonXP 1700+ running 7-STABLE: FreeBSD xxx 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #1: Thu Nov 13 23:54:59 BRT 2008 root@xxx:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/xxx i386 where I have two 750GB Seagate SATA Disks. They are divided as two slices, around the first 120GB are gathered in gmirror, and what left is in gstripe. so that's whats going on. if the machine locks, and fsck comes to

Hi, Whilst doing some QA work on XORP on my desktop, which has fxp0 and msk0, fxp0 got totally hosed. I was running PIM-SM and IGMPv2 router-mode on the box at the time. I wonder if this is related to the problems with fxp multicast transmission I saw back in April. I'm a bit concerned about this as fxp is still a very widespread and useful network chip. I am running

Hello there! Here's my story, hopefully some of you won't follow my steps and avoid some troubles :) Yesterday I've decided that's about time to test zfs functionality on my home server PC (i386 FreeBSD 7.1-pre) . A couple of weeks ago I bought new desktop PC (with SATA), so I had a bunch of PATA disks from old one to use in server. Lucky me - there was 3 HDD at size 40GB -

Hi all I've very big problem with my nfsd server. I'm running FreeBSD-stable and sometime (one time/week) i've this kind of message on the console : bge0 watchdog timeout problems fxp1 watchdog timeout problems and all my network card is down. Nothing can make the network card work again (only reboot working). There are only one service I need on this server and

Hello list On my server almost half of files are duplicated, and there are almost 100GB of data which is growing fast. I'm using weekly script to find duplicated files and replace them with hardlinks. Everything is fine as long as users aren't trying to edit and save some documents which have hardlinks. With samba 3.3 it seems that hardlinks aren't unlinked before file is saved.

This message was sent to bugtraq today: While playing around with FreeBSD 5.4 and jailing I discovered that it was possible to put an ethernet interface into promiscious mode from within the jailed environment, allowing a packetsniffer to gather data not meant for the jailed box. This also affects FreeBSD 5.3 (tested) but not FreeBSD 4.x This can be reproduced on boxes where BPF support is

Hello, after upgrading my system from 7.1-RELEASE to recent RELENG_7 I noticed stalled network transfers in certain cases. I have an Intel PRO/100 ethernet adapter (card=0x00408086 chip=0x12298086 rev=0x0c). In general networking works fine. I can ping hosts, surf on websites and so on. But if I send large files (>1 MB) to my server the transfer stalls after a few kilobytes. This concerns FTP

Hi, Our samba server is running Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES release 4 (Nahant Update 4) with samba version: samba-3.0.33-0.17.el4. We like to authenticate all the users with our Primary Domain Controller wnidows 2008. Some users keep getting asked to enter username and password. Even with the correct password, still can't access the drive. The strange thing is that some users are

hello all- and a happy holiday to all you geeks that are in front of the crt! I found these log messages in my logs and I am not sure what some of them signify. Dec 23 19:08:39 smtp kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 221 to 200 packets/sec Dec 23 19:08:40 smtp kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 241 to 200 packets/sec Dec 24 05:32:34 smtp kernel: fxp0: promiscuous mode

I''m looking at the newly-orderable (via Sun) STEC Zeus SSDs, and they''re outrageously priced. http://www.stec-inc.com/product/zeusssd.php I just looked at the Intel X25-E series, and they look comparable in performance. At about 20% of the cost. http://www.intel.com/design/flash/nand/extreme/index.htm Can anyone enlighten me as to any possible difference between an STEC

[ -netters, please Cc me or security@ with replies. ] I'm running into trouble integrating dynamic racoon-based IPSec into a network with ipfw and natd. I need to be able to allow VPN access from any address from authenticated clients. I've got the dynamic VPN working, with racoon negotiating SAs and installing SPs, but the problem is that I can't tell whether an incoming packet on

Hello, I am new to Samba4 and have installed the latest package 4.1.9 and have it working at 192.168.2.121. I am able to join PC's Win7 and Server 2012R2. I am able to browse to the hostname (\\test) and the IP (\\192.168.2.121) of the Samba4 server with access. I have downloaded the Remote server tools and am able to manage AD and DNS. All seems to be working except for accessing files

I've been using ipfw for a while to create a router with NAT and packet filtering, but have never combined it with stateful filtering, instead using things like "established" to accept incoming TCP packets which are part of a conversation initiated from the "inside". I'd like to move to using keep-state/check-state to get tighter filtering and also to allow outgoing

I have just checked the Openbsd box on the if interface. fxp0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 address: 00:02:55:30:54:28 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex) status: active inet 192.168.1.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 inet6 fe80::202:55ff:fe30:5428%fxp0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 xl0:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I'm trying to run a QEMU VM on top of a FreeBSD 7.x server ... I've tried the exact same setup on my desktop, using 192.168.1.x and an fxp device, and it all works perfectly, but as soon as I do this on another machine on a public IP, I'm not getting any routing, I can't even ping it from the same machine ... My first thought was

Hello, I have configured jail for users with sshd ftpd and auth. I started this jail on IP 127.0.0.10(there is an alias on lo0 interface), there was not any bigger problem to start it. But i have a problem with internet in this jail. I can log in to this jail through ssh or ftpd but i can't connect to the internet. I try to set up some kind of nat but it doesn't work. Can anybody help me

This is ifconfig on openbsd box: fxp0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 I think this output shows that the fxp0 interface is on simplex mode. The voice degradation I referred was by using xlite soft phone. I open 2 line similtaneously and dial to FWD and back to my incoming extension. Xlite is runnning on a w2k box with realtek 100M nic in auto mode. I can

Hi, I plan to connect to remote Asterisk that will terminate calls to ISDN primary channel. I'd certainly like to secure this type of service, so would kindly ask for any advice on how to secure this authentication as much as reasonably possible. Since there is long IP route I guess VPN will take too much additional bandwidth... Regards, Robert.

Dear list, A few days ago one of my machines were attacked by a DDoS-attack using UDP on random ports.. When I later on analyzed the logs, I found this in my dmesg: xl0: initialization of the rx ring failed (55) xl0: initialization of the rx ring failed (55) xl0: initialization of the rx ring failed (55) I tried to find out on google what it ment, but without any luck. What does that mean and