Displaying 20 results from an estimated 800 matches similar to: "libxen-dev: multiple symbol definition"
2008 May 19
1
error while static linking of libxenctrl and libxenguest
Hello,
When statically linking the following program:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <xenctrl.h>
#include <xenguest.h>
int main(void) {
printf("%p\n", xc_domain_resume);
printf("%p\n", xc_domain_save);
return 0;
}
gcc -static test.c -o test -lxenguest -lxenctrl -lpthread -lz
we get
2006 Oct 24
1
[PATCH] libxc: Include path fix
Hi!
There''s a include path mistake when trying to build
tools/libxc on OpenBSD:
gcc -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -m32 -march=i686 -DNDEBUG -std=gnu99 -Wall
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-unused-value -D__XEN_TOOLS__ -Werror
-fno-strict-aliasing -I. -Wp,-MD,.xc_core.o.d -c -o xc_core.o xc_core.c
In file included from xc_private.h:18,
from xg_private.h:16,
2007 Feb 23
1
RE: [PATCH][TOOLS] Reducingimpactofdomainsave/restore/dump on Dom0
> Put the Linux definition in xc_linux.c. Put a default dummy
> implementation
> in xc_private.c with __attribute__ ((weak)). If you have only a
> function
> prototype in xc_private.h then you won''t need -D_GNU_SOURCE for
> xcutil/Makefile.
This wont quite work -- xc_private.c isn''t part of libxenguest which
includes save/restore which needs the function...
2015 Feb 26
0
Does it still make sense to have versioned xen-hypervisor, libxen and xen-utils?
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 02:53:07PM +0100, Stefan Bader wrote:
> - libvirt
> * 1.2.12 starts to validate configs and requires full path specifications
> for hvmloader, pygrub, and qemu. Things are not completely cleared up,
> yet. But for the future the xen build would create a xenlight.pc that
> communicates the used paths. But still this would require to rewrite
>
2007 Sep 07
0
Backporting Xen 3.1 to Etch
Hi,
this morining I was trying to compile xen 3.1 on my Debian Etch (AMD64).
I have a little problem with gcc-multilib. It depends on many packages
that don't exist in Etch. So I brutally remove it from debian/control
and then dpkg-buildpackage.
There was some warning on compilation:
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: format of `NEEDED libxenstore.so' not recognized
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: format
2018 Oct 13
2
libxen-dev, libxen-4.8: Potential upgrade path issues with regard to qemu
While attempting to troubleshoot a problem with PCI passthrough, I noticed
a number of facts that, when considered together, may indicate a serious
upgrade path issue with regard to Xen and QEMU:
1. libxen-dev is a single package with two versions: a 4.8 version and a
4.11 version
2. libxen-dev version 4.8 produces libraries with 4.8 in the soname. A
qemu compiled against this version has
2006 Oct 17
0
[PATCH] Fixes for linking on Solaris
# HG changeset patch
# User john.levon@sun.com
# Date 1161090130 25200
# Node ID afeef751f9dafa771726bcfb00b29a10b0baeabd
# Parent 7147e57f18552bbb8d25155cc1c635315283ee31
On Solaris, GCC is configured to use Sun''s LD. Fix the build to use the correct
flags, and link against libsocket where necessary.
Signed-off-by: John Levon <john.levon@sun.com>
diff --git a/config/Linux.mk
2012 Dec 04
2
Bug#695176: libxen-ocaml-dev ocaml libraries contain build path to .so libraries rather than installed path
Package: libxen-ocaml-dev
Version: 4.2.0-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
The ocaml libraries are currently unusable as they contain the build path of .s libraries.
For example:
root at myvm:~# cat test.ml
let _ =
let v = Xenctrl.with_intf (fun h -> Xenctrl.version h) in
()
root at myvm:~# ocamlfind ocamlopt -package xenctrl test.ml -linkpkg -o test
File
2008 Jul 18
0
[PATCH] stubdom: fix build dependency
stubdom: fix build dependency
newlib now depends on mini-os header links
diff -r 4c2d9a4d11f2 stubdom/Makefile
--- a/stubdom/Makefile Fri Jul 18 13:58:29 2008 +0100
+++ b/stubdom/Makefile Fri Jul 18 14:19:52 2008 +0100
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
NEWLIB_STAMPFILE=$(CROSS_ROOT)/$(GNU_TARGET_ARCH)-xen-elf/lib/libc.a
.PHONY: cross-newlib
cross-newlib: $(NEWLIB_STAMPFILE)
-$(NEWLIB_STAMPFILE):
2007 Oct 01
1
[PATCH] libxc: fix lock_pages()/unlock_pages()
fix lock_pages()/unlock_pages(). The resion is sometimes wrongly calculated.
It results in unexpected hypercall failure.
--
yamahata
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
2011 Nov 25
2
[PATCH 6/7] Create 2 ocaml packages, libxen-4.1-ocaml and libxen-4.1-ocaml-dev.
V4 of the patch, incorporating Bastian's suggestions.
Jon
---
xen/debian/patches/series | 1 +
xen/debian/patches/tools-ocaml-fix-build.diff | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
xen/debian/rules | 5 ++
xen/debian/rules.real | 39 ++++++++++++
xen/debian/templates/control.main.in | 16 +++++
2013 Aug 17
2
double free or corruption in xl 4.2
Hi,
I backported the 4.2 packages from sid to wheezy, it works, but sometime
I obtain that kind of error, when trying to start a PV VM :
# xl create /etc/xen/ronflex.cfg
Parsing config from /etc/xen/ronflex.cfg
*** glibc detected *** /usr/lib/xen-4.2/bin/xl: double free or corruption (!prev): 0x0000000001e6a960 ***
======= Backtrace: =========
2005 Aug 27
1
problems getting xen going on FC4
I am tasked with installing xen on a FC4 machine. I went ahead and
followed the fedora xen howto, however when I rebootrd into the dom0
kernel I would get a page full of
hda: lost interrupt
followed by a blank screen.
I then decided to remove all that and go with a xen-testing from
source build.
Now when I do "make tools" in the -testing directory I get:
[...]
In file included from
2007 May 04
0
[PATCH] 3/4 "nemesis" scheduling domains for Xen
Implements tool interfaces for scheduling domains. libxenctrl, xm, and xend.
signed-off-by: Mike D. Day <ncmike@us.ibm.com>
--
libxc/xc_domain.c | 85 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
libxc/xenctrl.h | 43 ++++++++++++++++--
python/xen/xend/XendDomain.py | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
python/xen/xend/server/SrvDomain.py |
2013 Dec 02
3
[PATCH] libxenctrl: Fix xc_interface_close() crash if it gets NULL as an argument
xc_interface_close() crashes if it gets NULL as an argument. However,
it just calls xc_interface_close_common() which is called by many
others functions. It means that they are also vulnerable. So fix above
mentioned issue by adding NULL check in xc_interface_close_common().
This way we fix similar issue in other functions which calls
xc_interface_close_common() too.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Kiper
2006 Oct 17
0
[PATCH] misc compile fixes for tools on Solaris
# HG changeset patch
# User john.levon@sun.com
# Date 1161090738 25200
# Node ID 74d0bc37ec06da88b0c38a1c34c8cc95bc28bdbd
# Parent 7a86cb5bb6b6e9164bec378b5fb0a270625a2452
A couple of simple compile fixes for tools/ on Solaris.
Signed-off-by: John Levon <john.levon@sun.com>
diff --git a/config/Linux.mk b/config/Linux.mk
--- a/config/Linux.mk
+++ b/config/Linux.mk
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
2012 Oct 22
2
[LLVMdev] Section specialization & COFF.
On 20/10/12 03:15, Michael Spencer wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 2:55 AM, r4start <r4start at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi all.
>>
>> While compiling next code
>> @A = weak unnamed_addr constant { i32, i32, i32 } { i32 0, i32 0, i32 0 },
>> section ".data"
>> was discovered that llc ignores weak linkage if we emit it in COFF object.
>>
2006 Dec 08
3
build error: strerror() ...
Hi,
changeset 12809 gives me this:
xc_private.c: In function ‘safe_strerror’:
xc_private.c:500: warning: return makes pointer from integer without a cast
make[3]: *** [xc_private.o] Error 1
cheers,
Gerd
--
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@suse.de>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
2012 Oct 16
5
[LLVMdev] R_ARM_ABS32 disassembly with integrated-as
Getting closer... When emitting symbols, how do I set the symbol's value
to the address of the current instruction? Do I need to emit a label in
the current section and another that uses the former to point to the
latter? If possible, a code sample would be very helpful.
And probably questions for Tim, are these "section-relative" mapping
symbols, as defined in 4.6.5.1 of the
2010 Mar 11
0
Different results for different order of factor levels?
Dear R community,
I am a newbie to R and I am using lme() to analyzed a two way repeated
measures ANCOVA on some data I have gathered. In producing some
graphs based on the fixed effects I noticed that I get vary different
results depending on how I order my levels in my factor statement (see
code below). Now, I have read that different models treat data from
the factor class