similar to: CentOS Virt SIG and packages' priority problems?

On Mon, 17 Aug 2020 17:03:24 -0500 Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > I downloaded a Centos 8 image file : > > CentOS-8.1.1911-x86_64-dvd1.iso > > then I installed it as a kvm guest on a Centos 7 host machine. > > I installed a lot of the software; gui and server to give it a test drive. > > Nothing unusual about what I did that I can identify. And the message came up when

Hello CentOS, After performing an update on July 23, on 9 stream, I did notice problems with egl-wayland. In the AppStream repository, the package: * egl-wayland-1.1.9-2.el9.x86_64.rpm is present, but it's "-devel" counterpart seems missing. So, if you have an older version of egl-wayland-devel installed, it complains that it cannot upgrade "egl-wayland". Same

On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 at 09:48, Philippe Piot <piot at nicadd.niu.edu> wrote: > > No it did not work; see: > [piot at paris ~]$ sudo dnf install --nobest --allowerasing gcc-c++ > Last metadata expiration check: 0:18:24 ago on Thu 16 Jan 2020 08:28:51 AM CST. > Error: > Problem: package gcc-8.3.1-4.5.el8.x86_64 requires glibc-devel >= 2.2.90-12, but none of the providers

I have installed 1.12.8-10.el8_2, but when trying to install dbus-devel it is not available for that version, only 1.12.8-9.el8, which is also not available. Suggestions? # yum list | grep dbus dbus.x86_64 1:1.12.8-10.el8_2 @BaseOS dbus-common.noarch 1:1.12.8-10.el8_2

On Wed, 15 Jan 2020 at 23:29, Philippe Piot <piot at nicadd.niu.edu> wrote: > > All, > While updating my package using dnf update all I allow dnf to clean some > package with unresolved dependencies. > I would like to reinstall some of them but got an error message "but none > of the providers can be installed" during the install process as dnf is > trying

Thanks, Stephen. Just for completeness, the repo I am currently pointing to are [piot at paris opal]$ sudo dnf update CentOS-8 - AppStream 775 kB/s | 5.8 MB 00:07 CentOS-8 - Base 798 kB/s | 4.0 MB 00:05 CentOS-8 - Extras 2.9 kB/s | 2.1 kB 00:00 CentOS-8 - PowerTools 686 kB/s | 2.0 MB 00:02

On Sat, 23 Nov 2019, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 at 15:39, Sergio Belkin <sebelk at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I was using yum for years on CentOS servers, and since a few years ago dnf >> on Fedora desktops. My question is: >> Is the same yum4 on CentOS 8 that dnf? What should I use? >> Thanks in advance >>

On Tue, 2020-05-05 at 19:25 -0500, Robert G (Doc) Savage via CentOS wrote: > > I'm about ready to run "dnf erase *mate*" and try re-installing MATE > from scratch from the GNOME3 desktop. Is that possible without > ripping > the heart out of C8 by deleting other critical packages? I've attached a capture of "dnf erase *mate*" that shows the 104 packages

On 8/5/20 1:05 AM, centos at niob.at wrote: > On 04/08/2020 23:50, Jon Pruente wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 11:34 AM <centos at niob.at> wrote: >> >>> Q5) If the answer to the last question is "no": shouldn't there be such >>> a resource? >>> >> CentOS doesn't publish security errata. If you need it then you should

Trying to install certbot, for Lets Encrypt certificate installation. How do I fix the below repo issue? I have not been successful tracking down this issue using google. [root at dream postfix]# yum install https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/epel-release-latest-8.noarch.rpm CentOS-8 - AppStream 0.0 B/s | 0 B 00:10

On 01/05/2023 15:10, lejeczek via CentOS wrote: > Hi guys, > > Does your 'mock' work when used with 'centos-stream+epel-9-x86_64' config? > It fails for me with every rpm packages I tried: > > -> $ mock -r centos-stream+epel-9-x86_64 --rootdir=~/mock > --localrepo=/devs/var/www/dnf.repo --chain --continue > rpmbuild/rpm.src/pass-1.7.4-6.el9.src.rpm

Hi guys, Does your 'mock' work when used with 'centos-stream+epel-9-x86_64' config? It fails for me with every rpm packages I tried: -> $ mock -r centos-stream+epel-9-x86_64 --rootdir=~/mock --localrepo=/devs/var/www/dnf.repo --chain --continue rpmbuild/rpm.src/pass-1.7.4-6.el9.src.rpm ... CentOS Stream 9 - BaseOS 1.6 MB/s | 1.6 kB???? 00:00 The GPG keys listed for the

I have two suggestions about how to keep - for a while - the 388 kernel. First - Use DNF to remove the bad kernels. Then when a new one comes in it will take one of those slots. Second - Increase the number of installed kernels. That change is in yum.conf. https://linuxconfig.org/how-to-remove-old-unused-kernels-on-centos-linux If the number is too high, you may run out of room in /boot

On 8/5/20 10:45 AM, centos at niob.at wrote: > On 05/08/2020 16:49, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 8/5/20 1:05 AM, centos at niob.at wrote: >>> On 04/08/2020 23:50, Jon Pruente wrote: >>>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 11:34 AM <centos at niob.at> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Q5) If the answer to the last question is "no": shouldn't there be

On 4/21/20 2:09 PM, Tony Molloy wrote: > > Hi All, > > I've just installed a test laptop with CentOS Stream 8.1. > > I notice that the default install has both CentOS-Base and > CentOS-Base-Appstream repos enabled. Is that necessary, or should I > just have the Appstream repos enabled. > > The reason I'm asking is because I'm having trouble updating

On 4/22/20 9:38 AM, Tony Molloy wrote: > On Wed, 2020-04-22 at 08:25 -0500, johnny at centos.org wrote: >> EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email originated from outside of the University >> of Limerick. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you >> recognize the sender's email address and know the content is safe. > > > >> On 4/21/20 2:09 PM, Tony Molloy

Hi, I can't find 3 rpms (for now, maybe more later) in centos 8, which are available for centos 7 and 6. perl-Crypt-SSLeay perl-Data-Validate-IP ndisc6 Any ideas why these aren't in the repos yet? I'm using these repos below and I've browsed repos searching for these. # dnf repolist ... repo id repo name status

Hi All, I've just installed a test laptop with CentOS Stream 8.1. I notice that the default install has both CentOS-Base and CentOS-Base-Appstream repos enabled. Is that necessary, or should I just have the Appstream repos enabled. The reason I'm asking is because I'm having trouble updating the installation. The problem seems to be some installed rpms seem to depend on updates from

On Wed, 2020-04-22 at 08:25 -0500, johnny at centos.org wrote: > EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email originated from outside of the University > of Limerick. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you > recognize the sender's email address and know the content is safe. > On 4/21/20 2:09 PM, Tony Molloy wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > I've just

On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 08:35:14AM -0800, david wrote: > yum list installed > > and the following diagnostics occur: > ------------------------------- > Modular dependency problems: > > Problem 1: conflicting requests > - nothing provides module(perl:5.26) needed by module > perl-App-cpanminus:1.7044:8010020191120175858:a9207fc6-0.x86_64 > Problem 2: