similar to: How to avoid the Markdown code block bug on R Bugzilla

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "How to avoid the Markdown code block bug on R Bugzilla"

2000 Jan 04
0
Stepwise logistic discrimination - II
I apologise for writing again about the problem with using stepAIC + multinom, but I think the reason why I had it in the first place is perhaps there may be a bug in either stepAIC or multinom. Just to repeat the problem, I have 126 variables and 99 cases. I don't know if the large number of variables could be the problem. Of couse the reason for doing a stepwise method is to reduce this
2011 Jun 22
1
question about read.columns
HI, Dear R community, I have a large data set names dd.txt, the columns are: there are 2402 variables. a1, b1, ..z1, a11, b11, ...z11, a111, b111, ..z111.. IF I dont know the relative position of the columns, but I know I need the following variables: var<-c(a1, c1,a11,b11,f111) Can I use read.columns to read the data into R? I have tried the following codes, but it does not work
2008 May 12
2
Fenced-Code-Blocks in Python-Markdown
I'd like to announce a beta release of the Fenced-Code-Blocks Extension for Python-Markdown. <http://www.freewisdom.org/projects/python-markdown/Available_Extensions> The latest code for Python-Markdown and packaged extensions are now available on Gitorious. <http://gitorious.org/projects/python-markdown> The same syntax is used as the just released PHP Markdown Extra 1.2. I
2008 May 11
1
PHP Markdown 1.0.1l & Extra 1.2
Time for an update to PHP Markdown and PHP Markdown Extra. <http://michelf.com/project/php-markdown/> This new version of PHP Markdown Extra adds support for "fenced" code blocks (which I was previously calling "flat"). Fenced code blocks overcome many limitations of Markdown's indented code blocks: they can can be put immediately following a list item, can
2008 May 27
0
PHP Markdown Extra 1.2.1
This is an Extra-only release for fixing an embarrassing bug with fenced code blocks. <http://michelf.com/projects/php-markdown/> Extra 1.2.1 (27 May 2008): * Fixed a problem where Markdown headers and horizontal rules were transformed into their HTML equivalent inside fenced code blocks. In other words, this: ~~~ # hello - - - ~~~ would generate a header and
2017 Jul 07
2
Swallowing of input in FileCheck
Hi, Debugging tests which make use of FileCheck can be a frustrating experience, as all input will be swallowed (even with -v flag passed to lit), and one would often need to copy-and-paste and rerun the failing command manually without piping into FileCheck. Initially I’ve assumed that this is done due to stream processing, but looking at FileCheck source code I can see that it actually gets the
2019 Apr 30
2
Background R session on Unix and SIGINT
Yeah, I get that they are async. What happens is that the background process is not doing anything when the process gets a SIGINT. I.e. the background process is just listening on its standard input. AFAICT for an interactive process such a SIGINT is just swallowed, with a newline outputted to the terminal. But apparently, for this background process, it is not swallowed, and it is triggered
2000 Dec 07
1
Bugreport: Lines swallowed in std_out redirection
Hi, we are using OpenSSH_2.3.0p1. When using non-interactive mode, sometimes lines are swallowed from standard output: root at hydra:~ # ssh anderson "ls -l /usr/sbin/sshd" -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 612344 Nov 25 20:26 /usr/sbin/sshd root at hydra:~ # ssh anderson "ls -l /usr/sbin/sshd" root at hydra:~ # ssh anderson "ls -l /usr/sbin/sshd" -rwxr-xr-x 1
2019 Apr 30
0
Background R session on Unix and SIGINT
Can you give an example without callr? The key is how is the process stated and what it is doing which is entirely opaque in callr. Windows doesn't have signals, so the process there is entirely different. Most of the WIN32 processing is event-based. Cheers, Simon > On Apr 30, 2019, at 4:17 PM, G?bor Cs?rdi <csardi.gabor at gmail.com> wrote: > > Yeah, I get that they are
2019 Apr 30
0
[External] Re: Background R session on Unix and SIGINT
A Simon pointed out the interrupt is recorded but not processed until a safe point. When reading from a fifo or pipe R runs non-interactive, which means is sits in a read() system call and the interrupt isn't seen until sometime during evaluation when a safe checkpoint is reached. When reading from a terminal R will use select() to wait for input and periodically wake and check for
2008 Jun 22
0
PHP Markdown 1.0.1m & Extra 1.2.2
Here's another update to PHP Markdown and PHP Markdown Extra featuring some bug fixes. See the download link on the project's page: <http://michelf.com/projects/php-markdown/> This update also features a new emphasis parser which process regular and strong emphasis in one pass instead of two and four for previous versions of PHP Markdown and PHP Markdown Extra. The new parser
2019 Apr 30
2
Background R session on Unix and SIGINT
OK, I managed to create an example without callr, but it is still somewhat cumbersome. Anyway, here it is. Terminal 1: mkfifo fif R --no-readline --slave --no-save --no-restore < fif Terminal 2: cat > fif Sys.getpid() This will make Terminal 1 print the pid of the R process, so we can send a SIGINT: Terminal 3: kill -INT pid The R process is of course still running happily. Terminal 2
2019 May 01
0
[External] Re: Background R session on Unix and SIGINT
Gabor, I think you're talking about two independent things. You can interrupt the computation, no question about that. It's just that if you send an interrupt while you're *not* doing any computations, it will be signaled but not raised until the interrupts are checked since there is no one to check it. This goes back to my original response - the interactive REPL calls
2006 Oct 15
2
Getting check_box to default to checked?
I''ve tried this (in a new method/template -- so @type doesn''t actually exist yet): check_box ''type'', ''notify_on_create'', {:checked=>''true''} But :checked seems to get swallowed. I''ve also tried setting notify_on_create to true in the Type model, but that doesn''t work either. Any way to get the
2019 Apr 30
2
[External] Re: Background R session on Unix and SIGINT
Unfortunately --interactive also makes the session interactive(), which is bad for me, as it is a background session. In general, I don't want the interactive behavior, but was wondering if I could send as SIGINT to try to interrupt the computation of the background process, and if that does not work, then I would send a SIGKILL and start up another process. It all works nicely, except for
2011 Mar 07
4
email to web posting software?
Dear CentOS, I have a user group that would like to be able to routinely post (easily) emails to a web site. Must be usable without special training. I have no experience with this. Anyone have a suggestion? LAMP stack installed. Dave -- When a respected information source covers something where you have on-the- ground experience, the result is often to make you wonder how much fecal
2017 Jul 07
2
Swallowing of input in FileCheck
> On Jul 7, 2017, at 2:19 PM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 1:20 PM, George Karpenkov via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > Thus, I propose modifying FileCheck default behavior to dump all swallowed output on stderr when the test has failed. > Would there be any objections to
2006 Aug 02
7
form_for not working with Markaby
I''m playing around with Markaby and I decided to write a little blog app. I''m running into issues with forms however. If I use form_for the output of the form gets swallowed. For example: form_for :article, @article do |f| f.text_field :title f.check_box :published f.text_area :description f.text_field :pub_date f.text_area :content end gets rendered as an empty form
2011 Jun 23
4
markdown conversions
alan said: > I think I am in agreement, > if by "isn't necessary" you mean to say that > simply providing more features to Markdown > doesn't force end users to use them, > or even really know they exist. except that wasn't what i meant. i mean that it's not necessary to trade simplicity in order to get the power of additional
2007 Apr 24
0
Bug in Rails worker creation through scheduler
Hi Folks! A small bug in the Scheduler code caused a small nightmare for me over the last hours. The symptoms were that my scheduled worker (Rails-based) wouldn''t start. Nothing in the log files, no errors on the console, no hints whatsoever about what went wrong. So I filled up the code with logging statements and tracked down the problem to line 48 of