similar to: A document about implementing dtrace probes in SAX

I am using Samba v4.0.16. Join to the domain controller with two NIC's, it will fail once every two times. Response from the DNS, will succeed in domain join in the case of reachable IP addresses. However, it seems to fail to join domain in the case of unreachable IP addresses. ( V3.5.15 succeed in both cases. ) Please help someone. attach debug log ========== Windows Server2008r2

Hi, I am trying to setup dovecot replication based on: http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Replication http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2013-January/087674.html I know that 2.1.7 is dated, but I would refrain from upgrading, if not necessary. The problem I have is pretty much same as the one described in http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2013-January/087674.html: I have vmail user on both

Hi dovecot.org, When I set up vacation filter for a mailbox, the vacation response is generated even though none of the addresses in the email are same as the mailbox address itself. I have example email sent to "aliastouser at mpathix.com" which gets delivered to "user at my.domain.com" by dovecot-lda. The invocation command is: # /usr/lib/dovecot/dovecot-lda \ -d

Hi, I am trying to setup dovecot replication based on: http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Replication All mailboxes share the same UNIX userid ('vmail'), and I setup ssh-key based login for this account in both directions. As LDA exim4 is configured to use dovecot deliver LDA. Here is the relevant config from exim: /usr/lib/dovecot/deliver -d $local_part -f $sender_address -a

Hi, I''m trying to parse a XML document and put some of that information inside a rhtml file. I also have partials that I want to wrap around content in the XML stream. However, I don''t have any clue how to pass an object to the SAX2Listener so it can combine the partials and the XML together. Normally, in java I would pass the HttpResponse object or the PrintWriter

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:1184 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1184.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 85aed94f1ee9a2c4886d2bbca6ccd73b59d9e9e0903f866c84e12219703faeca perl-XML-SAX-0.14-13.el5.noarch.rpm x86_64:

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1446 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1446.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 47eeab4c308fbf62d697aa7130cad9a4 perl-XML-SAX-0.14-11.noarch.rpm Source: 87dceb01f600717c787f9bc069d5bac9 perl-XML-SAX-0.14-11.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1446 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1446.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 47eeab4c308fbf62d697aa7130cad9a4 perl-XML-SAX-0.14-11.noarch.rpm Source: 87dceb01f600717c787f9bc069d5bac9 perl-XML-SAX-0.14-11.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes

Hello again, I have another question related to parsing a very large xml file with SAX: what kind of data structure should I favor? Unlike using DOM function that can return lists of relevant nodes and let me use various versions of 'apply', the SAX parsing returns me one thing at a time. I first tried to simply append to simple solution of appending to lists as I get the data. But I

read list (S) This is a list of users that are given read-only access to a service. If the connecting user is in this list then they will not be given write access, ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ no matter what the writeable option is set to. The

Hello everyone, I'm trying to parse a very large XML file using SAX with the XML package (i.e., mainly the xmlEventParsing function). This function takes as an argument a list of other functions (handlers) that will be called to handle particular xml nodes. If when I use Rprof(), all the handler functions are lumped together under the <anonymous> label, and I get something like this:

Dear All, I have a question regarding best practise in setting up a XML parser within R. Because I have files with more than 100 MB and I'm only interested in some values I think a SAX-like parser using xmlEventParse() will be the best solution. Unfortunately the values I'm looking for, to construct some higher "mass spectrum", are distributed over different lines: as

Hi Bryan, > Does that sit well with everyone? Seems fine to me. Just revisiting one of Dragan''s points, though (sorry if I missed the answer) - is there a reason for making this global (via a #pragma) rather than, say, simply providing two functions which print in the different orders? e.g. printa() for sort by sample, printak() for sort by key. My reason for wanting to do both in