similar to: How to replace a brick in a dispersed volume?

Hi I'm looking for an advise to configure a dispersed volume. I have 12 servers and would like to use 10:2 ratio. Yet RH recommends 8:3 or 8:4 in this case: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Storage/3.1/html/Administration_Guide/chap-Recommended-Configuration_Dispersed.html My goal is to create 2PT volume, and going with 10:2 vs 8:3/4 saves a few bricks. With 10:2

Hi all, I have setup a dispersed cluster (2+1), version 3.12. The way our users run I guessed that we would get the penalties with dispersed cluster and I was right.... A calculation that usually takes about 48 hours (on a replicaited cluster), now took about 60 hours. There is alot of "small" reads/writes going on in these programs. Is there a way to tune, optimize a dispersed cluster

Hi all, I have setup a dispersed cluster (2+1), verision 3.12. I guessed that we going to get punished by small read/writes... and I was right. A calculation that usually takes 48 hours took about 60 hours and there are many small read/writes to intermediate files that at the end get summed up. Is there a way to tune, optimize a dispersed cluster to work better with small read/writes? Many

Hello, We are running glusterfs 6.6 on Ubuntu. We have a Gluster storage system that is a few years old. There are 4 VMs running a Dispersed (NOT replicated) system - a 3 + 1 configuration. Generally performance is well tuned for our needs, but the problem arose last time we added bricks: we attempted a rebalance which is reported as failed. From the mounted POSIX view of the file system, we

If you add bricks to existing volume one host could be down in each three host group, If you recreate the volume with one brick on each host, then two random hosts can be tolerated. Assume s1,s2,s3 are current servers and you add s4,s5,s6 and extend volume. If any two servers in each group goes down you loose data. If you chose random two host the probability you loose data will be %20 in this

Hi Mauro Tridici, >From the information provided it appears like you have placed 2 bricks of a subvolume on one host. Please confirm. The number of hosts that could go down without losing access to data can be derived based on the brick configuration/distribution. Please let us know the brick distribution plan. Regards, Sunil kumar Acharya Senior Software Engineer Red Hat

Hi All, I'm using gluster as dispersed volume and I send to ask for very serious thing. I have 3 servers and there are 9 bricks. My volume is like below. ------------------------------------------------------ Volume Name: TEST_VOL Type: Disperse Volume ID: be52b68d-ae83-46e3-9527-0e536b867bcc Status: Started Snapshot Count: 0 Number of Bricks: 1 x (6 + 3) = 9 Transport-type: tcp Bricks:

After adding 3 more nodes you will have 6 nodes and 2 HD on each nodes. It depends on the way you are going to add new bricks on the existing volume 'vol" I think you should remember that in a given EC sub volume of 4+2, at any point of time 2 bricks could be down. When you make 6 * (4+2) to 12 * (4+2) you have to provide path of the bricks you want to add. Suppose you want to add 6

Hi, On 14.03.2024 01:39, Theodore Buchwald wrote: > > ... So my question is. What would be the correct amount of bricks > needed to expand the storage on the current configuration of 'Number > of Bricks: 1 x (4 + 1) = 5'? ... > I tried something similar and ended up with a similar error. As far as I understand the documentation the answer in your case is "5".

Dear All, I just implemented a (6x(4+2)) DISTRIBUTED DISPERSED gluster (v.3.10) volume based on the following hardware: - 3 gluster servers (each server with 2 CPU 10 cores, 64GB RAM, 12 hard disk SAS 12Gb/s, 10GbE storage network) Now, we need to add 3 new servers with the same hardware configuration respecting the current volume topology. If I'm right, we will obtain a DITRIBUTED

centOs5.5/samba4/named here is a short guide setting it up to work. I added TSIG for bind-master amd bind-slave. Update to samba4 alpha13 added (installing git on CentOs 5.5). If you do this howto right now you will start with samba4 alpha13. You do not need the update section. But you need git for your installation because the rsync-thing is broken!!!!!! First of all do not install the bind

Hello Helpers, I have some problems with fitting the model for my data... -->my Literatur says (crawley testbook)= Non-normality of errors-->I get a banana shape Q-Q plot with opening of banana downwards Structure of data: origin wt pes gender 1 wild 5.35 147.0 male 2 wild 5.90 148.0 male 3 wild 6.00 156.0 male 4 wild 7.50 157.0 male 5 wild 5.90

centOs5.5/samba4/named here is a short guide setting it up to work. First of all do not install the bind package coming with centos 5.5!! Install needs for samba yum install libacl* gnutls* readline* python* gdb* autoconf* Named installation: Here is a description on what to do: http://jason.roysdon.net/2009/10/16/building-bind-9-6-on-rhel5-centos5-for-d nssec-nsec3-support/ The steps, yum

centOs5.5/samba4/named here is a short guide setting it up to work. First of all do not install the bind package coming with centos 5.5!! Install needs for samba yum install libacl* gnutls* readline* python* gdb* autoconf* Named installation: Here is a description on what to do: http://jason.roysdon.net/2009/10/16/building-bind-9-6-on-rhel5-centos5-for-d nssec-nsec3-support/ The steps, yum

On Thu, 2016-05-12 at 13:10 -0400, Laine Stump wrote: > On 05/12/2016 12:23 PM, lejeczek wrote: > > On Fri, 2016-05-06 at 07:41 -0400, Laine Stump wrote: > > > On 05/04/2016 08:40 AM, lejeczek wrote: > > > > hi users > > > > > > > > I have my dhcpd to serve nothing but virbr0 (libvirt), OS is > > > > Centos 7.2 > > > >

Hey Guys and Gals, I'm wondering if the quotas.c file is supposed to fix the problem where a Linux x86 system running with the quota software causes corrupt files to be written by Windows clients. I compiled it in and it didn't seem to make a difference for the following problem. In other words, if I enable quotas on my RH6.2 / 2.2.16-22 kernel box and then write a file via Samba/Windows

On 09/10/2015 11:19 PM, Carl E. Hartung wrote: > On Thu, 10 Sep 2015 22:50:47 -0400 > Robert Moskowitz wrote: > >>> That will use the default port on the remote host, you can override >>> that without specifying the -e if required using -p <port>. >> >> $ rsync -ah --stats --delete -p 613 root at 192.168.129.2:/etc/dhcp/ >>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hi, a security hole has been found in the auxiliary fax scripts "faxq" and "faxrunq" in the mgetty+sendfax package. It has been in there since the first day those scripts were written. Due to improper quoting in these shell scripts, it''s possible to execute code with a foreign user id, and get root access to the machine. The

On 09/11/2015 10:21 AM, C Linus Hicks wrote: > On 09/10/15, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > --------------- Quoted text ------------------ > SSh is not parsing the port the way http does, it seems: > > $ rsync -ah --stats root at 192.168.129.2:613:/etc/dhcp/ > /home/rgm/data/htt/httnet/homebase/new/dhcp > ssh: connect to host 192.168.129.2 port 22: No route to host >

On Thu, 10 Sep 2015 22:50:47 -0400 Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > That will use the default port on the remote host, you can override > > that without specifying the -e if required using -p <port>. > > > $ rsync -ah --stats --delete -p 613 root at 192.168.129.2:/etc/dhcp/ > /home/rgm/data/htt/httnet/homebase/new/dhcp > Unexpected remote arg: root at