similar to: Keeping the traffis on or off the list ?

On Feb 17, 2024, at 7:57?AM, Jim Klimov wrote: > > Other than that, I think the mailing list service we get from alioth comes "as is", not sure we can configure much about it. Can check, but not really inclined to - let humans decide how to best post and what is correct for each case :) > Jim, I think this made more sense before, when the mailing list didn't *add* a

I'd bet the following is news to nobody. Some of us Dislike setting Reply-To: at all. If it exists, there's an expectation that it should be followed. Some folks will want to reply to the sender, others to the list. So no matter which way is chosen, one group will be disappointed. An email client that makes it difficult for the user to override Reply-To: ... makes it ...

On Feb 17, 2024, at 11:17?AM, Greg Troxel wrote: > > I would guess that reply-to is getting added because of header munging. > Turn off munging and this all goes away. Please re-read my email that explains the current setup of the list: https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/nut-upsuser/2024-February/013560.html TL;DR we are not root on the mailing list server. This has worked out

I would guess that reply-to is getting added because of header munging. Turn off munging and this all goes away.

I sometimes get replies that are directed only to me. Oftentimes it is a sender "error" to not have used Reply to All, so I direct my response back to the list. Rarely it is about something the senders deem confidential, where a pointed reply seems to make sense (overriding would be bad). Other than that, I think the mailing list service we get from alioth comes "as is", not

On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 5:14?AM Stuart Henderson <stu at spacehopper.org> wrote: > The mail admins can choose what is covered by the DKIM signature. > In the case of barclays.com there are various headers (which I think > make it through the mailing list untouched) but also the body, which > does not; a footer with the list URL is added. The real issue here is that the Mailman

Test from Yahoo via Android --Gene

Hello Together Please i have new following Error, from DMARC Report, if i check my domain on example mxtoolbox i dont see any problems. Any from you know this Eror report, what i need to do to fix this issue? C:\folder>nslookup 94.237.32.243 Server: dns204.data.ch Address: 211.232.23.124 Name: wursti.dovecot.fi Address: 94.237.32.243

Okay, Yahoo is bumming me. Only system my mail is having an issue with. All mail is accepted, but junked. I can only think it is the DKIM/Domain keys. It is apparent that the dkim-milter is not part of the centos 5.x distro nor is it part of the mirrors, as far as I can tell. So...have any of you done it with your servers for sendmail? There are some sites that claim to have rpms and I have

I know it is not dovecot who should fix this. But anyone using dovecot is using an MTA, and receiving spam ;) I know how to look at email headers. Spf and dkim is not solving anything here. -----Original Message----- From: Sebastian Nielsen [mailto:sebastian at sebbe.eu] Sent: donderdag 11 juni 2020 10:23 To: Marc Roos; 'dovecot'; 'users' Subject: SV: handling spam from

Hello Mike, Yes, I am using a static IP address, but in theory, you could use a dynamic one. Nothing technically would prevent email exchanges between two boxes, as long as the SPF records are up to date and the DKIM is properly setup. Unfortunately, some ISPs are simply blacklisting full range of private IP addresses just because they are not officials / commercials. Kind regards, Andr? On

On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 12:14:51PM -0500, Gene Cumm wrote: > On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 9:27 AM, gene.cumm at yahoo.com <gene.cumm at yahoo.com> wrote: > > Test from Yahoo via Android > > > > --Gene > > _______________________________________________ > > Syslinux mailing list > > Submissions to Syslinux at zytor.com > > Unsubscribe or set options at:

Hi all, There's a good chance that the people who most need to see this won't see it, but here goes anyway. Google is currently dropping a _lot_ of the mail we attempt to deliver to lists.fd.o subscribers. The immediate cause is sending on mail from domains with SPF/DKIM/DMARC policies which explicitly specify that lists.fd.o cannot relay mail on their behalf. Every time we do that, not

Hi all, We have hit another step change in aggressive anti-spam techniques from major mail providers. Over the past few days, we saw a huge spike in the number of mails we were failing to deliver to GMail and outlook.com in particular. It looks like it is now no longer acceptable for us to break DMARC/DKIM/SPF. These are DNS-based extensions to SMTP, which allow domains to publish policies as to

Hi all, We have hit another step change in aggressive anti-spam techniques from major mail providers. Over the past few days, we saw a huge spike in the number of mails we were failing to deliver to GMail and outlook.com in particular. It looks like it is now no longer acceptable for us to break DMARC/DKIM/SPF. These are DNS-based extensions to SMTP, which allow domains to publish policies as to

> Let's say we have dovecot + sieve plugin container. > Dovecot configured to use remote SMTP submission host to send messages: > submission_host = postfix.example.com:587 I reviewed my config to see how i did it. I think you are right and SASL isn't used here. I have dovecot and postfix on the same machine and in dovecot i set submission_host = localhost:25 Then in my

I have dovecot postfix setup on my home server as well. I use a virtual server in the cloud as my mx record and mail relay and have my home record on dynamic dns. It's really effective. On Dec 10, 2017 2:37 PM, "Fabian A. Santiago" <fsantiago at garbage-juice.com> wrote: > On December 10, 2017 2:49:35 PM EST, "Andr? Rodier" <andre at rodier.me> >

Which part? Hosting the email server at home or the relay in the cloud? On Dec 10, 2017 14:53, "Fabian A. Santiago" <fsantiago at garbage-juice.com> wrote: > On December 10, 2017 3:39:05 PM EST, Stephan H <herker at gmail.com> wrote: > >I have dovecot postfix setup on my home server as well. I use a > >virtual > >server in the cloud as my mx record

Hi, -- This message refers to the maillist itself rather than to dovecot software -- I have noticed that when I post to this list (only), I get DKIM Verification failure reports from: root at moncton.sidefx.com (e.g. for my last post: "DKIM failure report for job 4D27B5DC4E on mail.sidefx.com") root at mail.rmacd.com (e.g. for my last post: "DKIM failure report for job

> On 29. Sep 2018, at 23:58, John R. Dennison <jrd at gerdesas.com> wrote: > > Save yourself the effort, time, headaches and eventual bloody tears of impotent > rage and just go with Google or some other provider. Running a mail > server properly is one of the more difficult tasks and quite often not > worth the time and trouble, especially if one is asking about it on a