similar to: trap info from dtrace ???

Howdy, I am attempting to isolate the location of a memory leak in a 4GL program, and have hit a bit of a snag. When I LD_PRELOAD libumem and run the application server, "::findleaks -fdv" reports numerous leaks: CACHE LEAKED BUFCTL CALLER 0000000100b49068 15 0000000100ef2d50 fdcon+0x6c4 0000000100b50028 1 0000000100b72ac0 fdcon+0x6c4 0000000100b49068

Does anyone out there have any thoughts on the type of load common DTrace scripts would cause on a system if run 24x7? I know "common DTrace scripts" and their underlining probe calls a vague statement. So for the lack of a common and establish set of scripts in the OS, I''ll use the most popular right for my question...the DTraceToolkit from Brendan Gregg. Which by the

I am trying to locate the code (xen hypervisor or dom0) where xen is configuring to hide the physical phages (MMIO or other physical pages) from domain(s). This way CPU generates pagefault when domain tries to access them, which causes VMExit to occur. In otherwords, there may be some where we must be registering pages to hide from domain. ????? I do know where it gets handled

On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 12:06:51PM -0700, Andrei Vagin wrote: > On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 12:08:05AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 02:04:12PM -0700, Nambiar, Amritha wrote: > > > On 8/1/2018 5:11 PM, Andrei Vagin wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 07:28:49PM -0700, Nambiar, Amritha wrote: > > > >> With this patch series,

Full_Name: Ziying Sherwin Version: 1.3.0 OS: Solaris 2.8 Submission from: (NULL) (130.14.31.32) We tried to install R on our Sun Solaris 2.8 machine using gcc 3.0. During the compilation, we got error messages like: gcc -I. -I../../../src/include -I../../../src/include -I/usr/local/include -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -g -O2 -c sockconn.c -o sockconn.o gcc -shared -o internet.so Rsock.o internet.o

Author: dmick Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: aaf08404ec592e56684b19ac5e3773c0d3155d0c Log message: 6310485 gcc and trapstat don''t get along 6310536 gcc and sfmmu header don''t get along 6310555 gcc and memlists don''t get along Files: update: usr/src/uts/common/os/mem_config.c update: usr/src/uts/common/os/memlist_new.c update:

Hi, Until recently I've been building LLVM with SHARED_LIBRARY=1. However, sith current svn, build now fails with unresolved symbols building opt. I've done a clean checkout, configure and make so it's not down to any local changes I've made. I'm building with: ./configure --enable-assertions \ --enable-expensive-checks=no \ --enable-pic \ --enable-targets=host-only \

Hello, I am running a Debian Testin/Unstable system with ii samba 3.0.1-2 a LanManager-like file and printer server fo ii samba-common 3.0.1-2 Samba common files used by both the server a And lately (more or less since the first 3.0 Samba i have been getting a _lot_ of segfaults.. Does someone have any clue as to what the below might be caused by? Isnt SIG11 usually

Add bochs_hw_set_*_endian() helper functions, to set the framebuffer byteorder at mode set time. Support both DRM_FORMAT_XRGB8888 and DRM_FORMAT_BGRX8888 framebuffer formats, no matter what the native machine byte order is. Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/bochs/bochs.h | 4 ++- drivers/gpu/drm/bochs/bochs_fbdev.c | 3 +-

Hello, We use samba to backup some (rather large) sql databases. Lately we ocasionally are getting fail reports, as in the file could not be written, and windows generating an error 64: "The specified network name is no longer available" While going trough the logs, i can see the following error (sorry for the long output): ----- [2008/05/19 01:14:46, 0]

On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 05:08:25AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 12:48:53AM +0200, Jean-Philippe Menil wrote: > > Hi, > > > > while playing with xdp and ebpf, i'm hitting the following: > > > > [ 309.993136] > > ================================================================== > > [ 309.994735] BUG: KASAN:

On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 05:08:25AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 12:48:53AM +0200, Jean-Philippe Menil wrote: > > Hi, > > > > while playing with xdp and ebpf, i'm hitting the following: > > > > [ 309.993136] > > ================================================================== > > [ 309.994735] BUG: KASAN:

I suspect my change adding --enable-shared broke you, since that configure option didn't exist before last week (r97119). SHARED_LIBRARY is not one of the variables you're supposed to be able to set on make's command line (http://llvm.org/docs/MakefileGuide.html#variables). What are you using it for? What happens if you remove it? On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 1:35 PM, James Williams

Dear All It is a little hard to give a good small example of my question,so I will show the full data on the bottom and the attachment.Maybe some one could tell me an appropriate way to show it.I'm sorry for the inconvenience. Q:How to generate a 53*53 diagonal matrix by my data Some problems confused me are that: 1.Since it is a diagonal matrix,I have tried to transform col1 and col2 to

On Monday August 4, akpm@osdl.org wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org> wrote: > > > > I came back this morning and found: > > EXT3-fs error (device md0) in start_transaction: Journal has aborted > > EXT3-fs error (device md0) in start_transaction: Journal has aborted > > EXT3-fs error (device md0) in start_transaction: Journal has aborted >

Hi, I tried to run the SPEC benchmark suite SPECCPU 2006 with llvm and clang 2.8. When building the perlbench sources I get these errors (see below) for all the source files. I used a config file ( http://old.nabble.com/file/p30085184/llvm.cfg llvm.cfg ) where I specify clang as the compiler. I verified the same sources with llvm-gcc and it works fine. Also, I verified the sjeng benchmark from

Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/engine/graph/nv50.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/engine/graph/nv50.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/engine/graph/nv50.c index 0f8d18a..30ed19c 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/engine/graph/nv50.c +++

(2013/11/23 6:21), Andi Kleen wrote: > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 04:22:21AM +0000, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: >> Use NOKPROBE_SYMBOL macro to protect functions from kprobes >> instead of __kprobes annotation in trap.c. >> This also applies __always_inline annotation for some cases, >> because NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() will inhibit inlining by referring >> the symbol address.

Commit-ID: ffba488a87578bfe0704dd906466fc64a88ff488 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=ffba488a87578bfe0704dd906466fc64a88ff488 Author: Herbert Xu <herbert at gondor.apana.org.au> AuthorDate: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 19:52:43 +0800 Committer: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> CommitDate: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 02:57:21 +0000 [klibc] trap: Implement

Commit-ID: b9c84707e06be25579b9402f740c763ed79cbdde Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=b9c84707e06be25579b9402f740c763ed79cbdde Author: Herbert Xu <herbert at gondor.apana.org.au> AuthorDate: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 19:52:43 +0800 Committer: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> CommitDate: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 21:42:54 +0000 [klibc] dash: trap: Implement