similar to: Really interesting CEPH performance analysis.

On 2016-01-08 at 09:31 -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 04:26:24PM +0100, Dirk Laurenz wrote: > > Hello List, > > > > as anyone tried to install samba with/ontop on a ceph cluster? > > Try compiling and setting up with vfs_ceph. Correct, that's basically it. > Needs some more work, but should work. Some posix features are not quite there

Hello List, as anyone tried to install samba with/ontop on a ceph cluster? Regards, Dirk

On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 05:47:35PM -0500, Joshua Dotson wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to build an active/active virtualization cluster using a Ceph > RBD as backing for each libvirt-managed LXC. I know live migration for LXC > isn't yet possible, but I'd like to build my infrastructure as if it were. > That is, I would like to be sure proper locking is in place for

Hi, some time back we had similar discussions when we, as an email provider, discussed to move away from traditional NAS/NFS storage to Ceph. The problem with POSIX file systems and dovecot is that e.g. with mdbox only around ~20% of the IO operations are READ/WRITE, the rest are metadata IOs. You will not change this with using CephFS since it will basically behave the same way as e.g. NFS. We

Hello Jack, yes, I imagine I'll have to do some work on tuning the block size on cephfs. Thanks for the advise. I knew that using mdbox, messages are not removed but I though that was true in sdbox too. Thanks again. We'll soon do benchmarks of sdbox vs mdbox over cephfs with bluestore backend. We'll have to do some some work on how to simulate user traffic, for writes and readings.

Hello Using two file server with samba 4.12.6 running as a CTDB cluster and trying to share a specific path on a cephfs. After loading the config the ctdb log shows the following error: ctdb-eventd[248]: 50.samba: ERROR: samba directory "/plm" not available Here is my samba configuration: [global] clustering = Yes netbios name = FSCLUSTER realm = INT.EXAMPLE.COM registry

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: libvirt-users-bounces@redhat.com [mailto:libvirt-users- > bounces@redhat.com] Namens Björn Lässig > Verzonden: vrijdag 27 mei 2016 10:10 > Aan: libvirt-users@redhat.com > Onderwerp: [libvirt-users] migrate local storage to ceph | exchanging the > storage system > > TLDR: Why is virsh migrate --persistent --live domain >

hi jeremy / all, On 11/6/19 10:39 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote: > This is re-exporting via ceph whilst creating 1000 files, > yes ? What timings do you get when doing this via Samba > onto a local ext4/xfs/btrfs/zfs filesystem ? yes, creating 10k small files. doing the same on a local ssd, formatted with an ext4 fs without any special options: root at plattentest:/mnt-ssd/os# time for s in

Hi there, I met one problem that guest fail to boot up when Selinux is enabled with guest storage based on ceph. However, I can boot the guest with qemu directly. I also can boot it up with Selinux disabled. Not sure it is a libvirt bug or wrong use case. 1. Enable Selinux # getenforce && iptables -L Enforcing Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination

On 21/09/2020 08:55, Jonas via samba wrote: > Hello > > > Using two file server with samba 4.12.6 running as a CTDB cluster and trying to share a specific path on a cephfs. After loading the config the ctdb log shows the following error: > > > ctdb-eventd[248]: 50.samba: ERROR: samba directory "/plm" not available > > > Here is my samba configuration: >

Greetings all! I am in the process of deploying a POC around SAMBA and CEPH. I'm having some trouble locating concise instructions on how to get them to work together (without having to mount CEPH to the computer first and then exporting that mount via SAMBA). Right now, my stopper is trying to locate ceph.so for x64 CentOS 6.5. [2014/02/26 15:05:23.923617, 0]

On 06/07/2013 04:18 PM, John Nielsen wrote: > On Jun 7, 2013, at 5:01 PM, Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com> wrote: > >> On 06/07/2013 02:41 PM, John Nielsen wrote: >>> I am running some qemu-kvm virtual machines via libvirt using Ceph RBD as the back-end storage. Today I was testing an update to libvirt-1.0.6 on one of my hosts and discovered that it includes this

"Rowland penny via samba" samba at lists.samba.org ? 21 September 2020 11:03 > On 21/09/2020 08:55, Jonas via samba wrote: > No idea about the cephs part, but your smb.conf isn't correct, your > workgroup shouldn't be the same as the realm, perhaps use 'INT' instead. > You have no 'idmap config' lines, how are you going to map your AD users > to

Hello everybody, virt-install --version 1.4.0 How do I create a ceph network disk with virt-install without having to edit it? <disk type='network' device='disk'> <driver name='qemu' type='raw'/> <auth username='libvirt'> <secret type='ceph' uuid='ec9be0c4-a60f-490e-af83-f0f27aaf48c9'/>

On 05/30/2016 09:07 AM, Dominique Ramaekers wrote: >> root@host_a:~# virsh migrate --verbose --p2p --copy-storage-all --persistent -- >> change-protection --abort-on-error --undefinesource --live domain >> qemu+ssh://root@host_b/system --xml domain.ceph.xml > > Weird: The domain should be persistent Well, the domain is persistent. But the changes i did to domain.ceph.xml

On 03/31/2015 11:47 AM, Brian Kroth wrote: > Hi, I've recently been working on setting up a set of libvirt compute > nodes that will be using a ceph rbd pool for storing vm disk image > files. I've got a couple of issues I've run into. > > First, per the standard ceph documentation examples [1], the way to add > a disk is to create a block in the VM definition XML

TLDR: Why is virsh migrate --persistent --live domain qemu+ssh://root@host/system --xml domain.ceph.xml not persistent and what could i do about it? Hi, after years of beeing pleased with local storage and migrating the complete storage from one host to another, it was time for ceph. After setting up a cluster and testing it, its time now for moving a lot of VMs on that type of storage, without

Hi everybody, my background: I'm doing Xen since 10++ years, many years with DRBD for high availability, since some time I'm using preferable GlusterFS with FUSE as replicated storage, where I place the image-files for the vms. In my current project we started (successfully) with Xen/GlusterFS too, but because the provider, where we placed the servers, uses widely CEPH, we decided to

Hi all, I am looking in to ceph and cephfs and in my head I am comparing with gluster. The way I have been running gluster over the years is either a replicated or replicated-distributed clusters. The small setup we have had has been a replicated cluster with one arbiter and two fileservers. These fileservers has been configured with RAID6 and that raid has been used as the brick. If disaster

[Note: This message has also been sent to ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org & puppet-openstack@puppetlabs.com] Hi, I''m currently working on writing a Puppet module for Ceph. As after some research I found no existing module, I''ll start from scratch but I would be glad to hear from people who would already have started working or this or having any idea or pointers regarding this