similar to: MFI driver

Hi folks; This may not even be Samba related, but I'm stumped, so I thought I'd toss this one out here. All the client machines are on 192.168.1.x, all netmasks are configured as /24, etc. I cannot browse the network. I CAN connect to a resource on the server just fine if I specify the full name, but an attempt to bring up the network browser shows the network name (DENNINGER) but

> On 28/10/2011 04:14, Jan Mikkelsen wrote: > >/ Hi, > />/ > />/ There is a patch linked to from this PR, which seems very similar: > />/ > />/ http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/140416 > />/ > />/ http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-scsi/2011-March/004839.html > />/ > />/ The problem is also consistent with running

Hi folks; Not sure what's going on here.... Running 3.0.14a here, with a fairly default config. Base OS is FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE. FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #11: Fri Apr 8 09:48:24 CDT 2005 karl@FS.denninger.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KSD-SMP Here's the output from "testparm" Load smb config files from /usr/local/etc/smb.conf Processing section "[homes]" Processing

This patch add an emulation for the LSI MegaRAID SAS HBA. It is using SG_IO to forward / pass through SCSI commands to the underlying block driver, so no emulation is done currently. Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare at suse.de> --- Makefile.hw | 2 +- hw/megasas.c | 1134 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ hw/pci_ids.h | 2 + 3 files changed, 1137

This patch add an emulation for the LSI MegaRAID SAS HBA. It is using SG_IO to forward / pass through SCSI commands to the underlying block driver, so no emulation is done currently. Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare at suse.de> --- Makefile.hw | 2 +- hw/megasas.c | 1134 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ hw/pci_ids.h | 2 + 3 files changed, 1137

Hi, I will soon be committing a change to MachineFrameInfo::CreateStackObject that removes the "bool MayNeedSP" parameter. This API change is part of larger patch that re-works stack layout passes to use analysis from the StackProtector pass to layout StackProtected objects (http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2158). Out of tree targets will need to update their usage accordingly. The

I have the 5.x Centos DVD and loaded it. Please be gentle with me, as I'm nominally a FreeBSD kind of guy... :) Anyway, I'm trying to install Postgres and the three libraries in the subject line are missing off the base installation. I figured out how to load gcc using yum, but those libraries aren't there, and I need the former in particular in order to enable SSL for Postgres

after rebooting I get very often: ... mfi0: COMMAND 0xffffff800132d990 TIMEOUT AFTER 659 SECONDS mfi0: COMMAND 0xffffff800132d990 TIMEOUT AFTER 689 SECONDS mfi0: COMMAND 0xffffff800132d990 TIMEOUT AFTER 719 SECONDS ... another reboot usualy fixes this. danny

Hello, We're getting around to upgrading our mail server and here are the quick specs: MegaRAID SCSI 320-2X http://www.lsilogic.com/products/megaraid/scsi_320_2x.html TYAN Transport TA26 B2882T26U8H 2U Barebone Server-Rackmount - Retail http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?item=N82E16856152007 plus RAM, CPU and 4 SCSI drives setup in a RAID-5 Is that MegaRAID controller supported in

I'm writing a pass that looks at the operands of certain non-commutable instructions and swaps a couple of them if certain conditions exist (a register bank conflict in the instruction). If the conflict exists, I build a new instruction which has the 2nd and 3rd operands swapped (using BuildMI). Then I want to get rid of the original instruction. I had done some searching and found that

These show up under Windows XP as if they are SCSI adapters (they're not, obviously.) Has there been any view towards supporting these on FreeBSD? They're on all the recent Intel motherboards for the last year and a half or so. Also, is there any particular benefit (or penalty) to running the amd64 build on Quad-Core or i7-series processors? I have an app that might benefit from

Hi, i'm installing a new mail server for our faculty and want to use the squirrelmail plugin 'avelsieve' (1.9.7). As documented on the dovecot wiki there is a problem in the STARTTLS code and i found a solution (that works for my installation): i've traced the server output in 'get_response' and instead of a script list i saw "IMPLEMENTATION". So i took a look

I start my porting for picoblaze,the soft cpu for fpga ,which is designed by XILINX from MSP430 porting . After some day's work , somethinig looks good , for it can generate for some simple C program: eg : int f1(int a) { return a+1; } but it failed with this : char f() { char a; a++; a++; a++; a++; a++; a++; a++; a++; a++; a++; a++; a++; a++; a++; a++;

Thanks for the information. I still don't know how do I partition registers into different classes from the virtual registers? For instance, I have the function who which iterates over the instructions, but I don't know how to write the function which returns the different register class. void RAOptimal::Gather(MachineFunction &Fn) { // Gather just iterates over the blocks,

Hi folks; I have an odd one. I recently upgraded from 3.3.x to 3.4.3 and suddenly lost both the old "smbpasswd" file AND the ability to connect to printers from Windows 7 clients. File server is fine, and everything else is working - I can connect to printers from XP machines, but not from Windows 7 any more. I get an "0x00000000d" error from Win7 when I try to connect....

This seems a very natural approach but I probably am having a trouble with the iterator invalidation. However, looking at other peephole optimizers passes, I couldn't see how to do this: #define BUILD_INS(opcode, new_reg, i) \ BuildMI(*MBB, MBBI, MBBI->getDebugLoc(), TII->get(X86::opcode)) \ .addReg(X86::new_reg, kill).addImm(i) for

Hello, While tuning the MIScheduler for my target, I discovered a code that unnecessarily restricts the scheduler. I think this is a bug, but I would appreciate a second opinion. In file ScheduleDAGInstrs.cpp, the function MIsNeedChainEdge determines whether two MachineInstrs are ordered by a memory dependence. It first runs through the standard criteria (Do both instructions access memory?

I'm trying to understand the Win64 case of the code below, from X86RegisterInfo.cpp: // If this is x86-64 and the Red Zone is not disabled, if we are a leaf // function, and use up to 128 bytes of stack space, don't have a frame // pointer, calls, or dynamic alloca then we do not need to adjust the // stack pointer (we fit in the Red Zone). if (Is64Bit &&

> This sounds like the ADJCALLSTACK DOWN/UP 'instructions' around the call > aren't set right, or you have declared a SP offset. It doesn't look like > the ARM backend does this, so this is probably the problem. The ARM backend currently doesn't use a frame pointer. It uses the same technique of the PPC backend to avoid add/subs around calls. In the PPC backend we

Dear R-Helpers, I'm working with immunoassay data and 5PL logistic model. I wanted to experiment with different forms of weighting and parameter selection, which is not possible in instrument software, so I turned to R. I am using R 2.14.2 under Win7 64bit, and the 'nls' library to fit the model - I started with the same model and weighting type (1/y) as in the instrument to see