similar to: Legacy Pluralized Table Names

Hi I am trying to use Ruby on Rails to work with an existing database. The problem is that, all the table names begin with a captial letter (e.g. Products). So I did the following changes in environment.rb, I''ve added under # Include your application configuration below ActiveRecord::Base.pluralize_table_names = false In class Product, I''ve added set_table_name

I am using ms sql server and want to configure RoR such that it does not convert the given table name (example: rubyonrails) to ruby_on_rails. I set @@pluralize_table_names = false, so that it does not pluralize the table names but cannot find the config setting which will force it not to put underscore between words in a table name. thanks in advance, -- avinash -- Posted via

If I do: script/generate controller Photo I get a controller named photo_controller. OTOH, if I do: script/generate scaffold Photo I get a controller named photos_controller. (Note that the controller name is pluralized). I realize that I''m specifying the controller name explicitly in the first case, but it seems odd to me that the scaffold command generates a pluralized

Hi, I haven''t done any associations before, so please forgive my incorrect use of terminology... If I set up a has_many :through association, can I manipulate the associated instances directly (like an Array), or do I need to manipulate the join model? For example, suppose I have two classes and the associated join model: class foo has_many :foo_bars has_many :bars, :through

I''m having a spot of bother creating a ''has_many'' relationship between two legacy database tables. The relationship is ''company'' table has many linked records in the ''contact'' table. Iv''e used ''generate scaffold'' on these tables and everything is fine. I then decided to define the relationship in the

People, I have an insurance company client and for the last eleven years I have wanted to completely redevelop their system from scratch. However, the boss has never been interested in hiring a team to develop the new system (partly because of the cost and partly because of some famous and expensive development failures in the industry) and has always insisted on incremental development of the

How do I get scaffold to generate code for a table whos name is not plural of the modelname I give to it. I.E., If I have an existing database, and wish to generate scaffold code for existing tables, is this possible??? _______________________________________________ Rails mailing list Rails-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails

I have a model (accessed restfully) named TranscoderQueue, it''s name is overridden to ''TransocderQueue'' so it is accessed as ''/ transocder_queue'' as opposed to ''/transocder_qeueus''. class TranscoderQueue < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :campaign, :class_name => "Campaign", :foreign_key => "campaign_id"

Are my eyes going buggy, or did something recently change in Edge Rails so that now scaffolds are generated with pluralized controller/ helper/etc names? I peeked at the code in railties/lib/rails_generator/generators/components/scaffold/ scaffold_generator.rb around line 50, and it looks like there was a change there recently so that it now defaults to pluralized names. So why was this

One issue is there in connecting one schema(table) "CR_Country" and "CR_Security" from this sybase Db. I have set false for pluralize_table_name and also setting the table name explicitly too as follow in the "environment.rb" : ====================================== ActiveRecord::Base.pluralize_table_names = false class CR_Country < ActiveRecord::Base

Hi! The script/generator scaffold for models doesnt respect (source in) this config/environment.rb setup, right? Because I can put in there ActiveRecord::Base.pluralize_table_names = false but when I run a command like ruby script/generate scaffold model Something then it throws an error saying that my database scheme doesnt have a Something. However there is a table called something. If I

What is it in Rails 2.3.2? ActiveRecord::Base.pluralize_table_names = false -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe

Here is a sample of the database structure I want to have: someclientname-websites someclientname-canned_responses someclientname-canned_responses_websites anotherclientname-websites anotherclientname-canned_responses anotherclientname-canned_responses_websites As you can see I want to prepend the name of my future clients to the table name so that they use completely different sets of data. I

Hi, In My database there is a table called "categories". Now what name should I specify for my model as per ruby naming convention? Is it "Category"??? Also is it possible to keep database table name singular instead of plural? Please tell me. Thanx in advance. Prash -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi, I want to retrieve the set of key & values which returns from a stored procedure : connection.select_all "exec common.dbo.scr_lookupric ''AAP.N'' ". The results i want to display in a view screen call result.rhtml. Please help me out ASAP. Thanks in advance. joshua... -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi! I got a class named EinsatzFilter which I serialized to session. Before saving to session it works afterwards I keep getting the message: "undefined method `to_s'' for #<Person:0x38c6ab8>". "Person" is a from ActiveRecord::Base inherited class. Code: class EinsatzFilter include ApplicationHelper attr_reader :personen, :monat, :projekte, :kunde

Railers: Greetings from the low end of the learning curve. I have installed all the prerequisites on Win32, including a lite MySQL database with a table in it called Inventory. Then I run this command line... ruby script/generate ajax_scaffold Inventory ...and I get this error message: error Before updating scaffolding from new DB schema, try creating a table for your model

Hi, I have a legacy database ''old'' and a new database ''new'' which rails uses. I set up models using old with establish_connection(old), and this works well, except for include: class OldModel < ActiveRecord::Base establish_connection(old) end class NewModel < ActiveRecord::Base has_one :old_model end a = OldModel.find :first NewModel.find(:all,

If I understand things correctly, by default, Rails expects both the ActiveRecord class name and the model name (i.e., the name of the file that contains the definition of the ActiveRecord class) to be the singluar of the table name. How can I override this default behavior with respect to the model name? That is, I would like to have the file name of the file that contains the definition of the

Hi guys, I have a situation here. I have my project set to no pluralization due to legacy tables in environment.rb. Now, I have some new tables which I''m starting to pluralize. When I do a generate a scaffold to this new table: script/generate scaffold my_tables table it seems to work out fine for certain sections like http://mysite.com/railsapp/new (which also inserts properly to