similar to: [releng_7 tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

TB --- 2008-07-29 09:37:14 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2008-07-29 09:37:14 - starting RELENG_7 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2008-07-29 09:37:14 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2008-07-29 09:37:32 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2008-07-29 09:37:32 - /usr/bin/csup -r 3 -g -L 1 -h localhost -s /tinderbox/RELENG_7/sparc64/sparc64/supfile TB ---

TB --- 2012-12-04 23:10:18 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-12-04 23:10:18 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012 root at farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-12-04 23:10:18 - starting RELENG_8 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2012-12-04 23:10:18 - cleaning

Hi, could anyone give recommendations (or share experience) regarding using ZFS: - FreeBSD 7-Stable (amd64 with 8GB RAM) + special tuning necessary (apart from increasing kernel memory to 1 or more GB for ZFS) - Samba 3.2 + ACLs possible directly under ZFS? + recommended compile options? - NFS - email (imap) - jails (I have seen some problems exist with using snaphots within

This is a belated heads up to let you know that I have merged DTrace to the releng7 branch in the nick of time before the feature freeze for 7.1. Those astute mailing list readers will note that the commit message appears to have gone missing. Well, either the dog ate it or subversion decided that it was for certain eyes only (and not yours, or mine). I have added a note to src/UPDATING

TB --- 2013-11-25 17:30:12 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-11-25 17:30:12 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE #0 r243825: Tue Dec 4 09:23:10 UTC 2012 root at farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013-11-25 17:30:12 - starting RELENG_8 tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2013-11-25 17:30:12 -

Hi there colleagues, atapci3: <nVidia nForce MCP55 SATA300 controller> port 0xbc00-0xbc07,0xb880-0xb883,0xb800-0xb807,0xb480-0xb483,0xb400-0xb40f mem 0xefcb3000-0xefcb3fff irq 23 at device 5.2 on pci0 atacontrol detach ata7 - insert ATA disk (ad14) atacontrol attach ata7 pinics with Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode (kgdb) bt #0 doadump () at pcpu.h:196 #1 0xc0533227

TB --- 2003-08-09 16:00:11 - starting RELENG_4 tinderbox run for alpha/alpha TB --- 2003-08-09 16:00:11 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/alpha/alpha TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -rRELENG_4 src TB --- 2003-08-09 16:00:11 - /usr/bin/cvs returned exit code 1 TB --- 2003-08-09 16:00:11 - ERROR: unable to check out the source tree TB ---

TB --- 2003-08-09 16:00:12 - starting RELENG_4 tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2003-08-09 16:00:12 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/pc98 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -rRELENG_4 src TB --- 2003-08-09 16:00:12 - /usr/bin/cvs returned exit code 1 TB --- 2003-08-09 16:00:12 - ERROR: unable to check out the source tree TB ---

TB --- 2003-08-09 16:00:11 - starting RELENG_4 tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2003-08-09 16:00:11 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -rRELENG_4 src TB --- 2003-08-09 16:00:11 - /usr/bin/cvs returned exit code 1 TB --- 2003-08-09 16:00:11 - ERROR: unable to check out the source tree TB ---

Hi All. After one false start, I now have a Tinderbox up and running for the OpenSSH portable tree. For those not familiar with it, Tinderbox is a tool for automatically displaying the status of builds and tests. At the moment, I do 1 update and 4 builds hourly. It's not fully functional yet but the basics work. It can be found at http://dodgynet.dyndns.org/tinderbox/OpenSSH_Portable/ (I

Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Always Learning <centos at u64.u22.net> wrote: > > > >> Yes, in english, 'work as a whole' does mean complete. And the normal > >> interpretation is that it covers everything linked into the same > >> process at runtime unless there is an alternate

Hello, I'm experiencing a kernel panic that appears to be caused by zfs. No errors are making it into /var/log/messages, but here is the error message that appears on my screen after panic (transcribed): panic solaris assert BSWAP_32(sa_hdr_phys->sa_magic) == SA_MAGIC, file: /src/sys/modules/zfs/../../cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/sa.c, line 1262 I can reproduce this by

Hi All ; What is the status of ZFS on linux and what are the kernel''s supported? Regards Mertol <http://www.sun.com/> http://www.sun.com/emrkt/sigs/6g_top.gif Mertol Ozyoney Storage Practice - Sales Manager Sun Microsystems, TR Istanbul TR Phone +902123352200 Mobile +905339310752 Fax +902123352222 Email <mailto:Ayca.Yalcin at Sun.COM> mertol.ozyoney at

Hello, 9-STABLE fails to build with clang and *without* "NO_WERROR=" and "WERROR=" in /etc/make.conf. It used to work not long before : FreeBSD zozo.afpicl.lan 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #0 r237222M: Mon Jun 18 10:18:54 CEST 2012 root@zozo.afpicl.lan:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CORE amd64 # svnversion 238067M # make NOCLEAN=yes NO_CLEAN=yes buildworld [...] ===> cddl/lib

Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com> wrote: > On 04/27/2015 12:28 PM, Joerg Schilling wrote: > > Up to now, nobody could explain me how a mixture of GPL and BSD can be legal as > > this would require (when following the GPL) to relicense the BSD code under GPL > > in order to make the whole be under GPL. > > The GPL doesn't require that you relicense

Hi. I''m happy to inform that the ZFS file system is now part of the FreeBSD operating system. ZFS is available in the HEAD branch and will be available in FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE as an experimental feature. Commit log: Please welcome ZFS - The last word in file systems. ZFS file system was ported from OpenSolaris operating system. The code in under CDDL license. I''d

Hello, I believe that ZFS and it''s concepts is truly revolutionary to the point that I no longer see any OS as modern if it does not have comparable storage functionality. Therefore I think that file system/disk manager with similar qualities should be written for Linux. Does Sun have plans to dual license ZFS as GPL so it can be ported to native Linux? If not, is it legal to write

TB --- 2013-11-13 13:00:41 - tinderbox 2.20 running on worker01.tb.des.no TB --- 2013-11-13 13:00:41 - FreeBSD worker01.tb.des.no 9.1-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE-p4 #0: Mon Jun 17 11:42:37 UTC 2013 root at amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013-11-13 13:00:41 - starting RELENG_10 tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2013-11-13 13:00:41 - cleaning the

TB --- 2008-06-03 08:42:30 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-legacy.sentex.ca TB --- 2008-06-03 08:42:30 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2008-06-03 08:42:30 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2008-06-03 08:43:09 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2008-06-03 08:43:09 - /usr/bin/csup -r 3 -g -L 1 -h localhost -s /tinderbox/RELENG_6/i386/i386/supfile TB --- 2008-06-03 08:43:22

Hi If I have the wrong list please feel free to redirect me. I'm running 7.0-RELEASE-p4 and trying to backup to an external USB drive. I'm using the following command dump -a0Lf /backup/diskimages/root /dev/mfid0s1a Where df: Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/mfid0s1a 507630 208436 258584 45% / /dev/da1s1d 709513458