similar to: r19 - in trunk/debian: . patches

Author: ultrotter Date: 2006-02-19 18:38:10 +0000 (Sun, 19 Feb 2006) New Revision: 26 Added: trunk/debian/patches/30xenchangeset.dpatch Modified: trunk/debian/patches/00list trunk/debian/patches/10sysconfig.dpatch trunk/debian/rules Log: Add 10sysconfig.dpatch description Add 30xenchangeset.dpatch to make the xen changeset configurable Force the xen changeset to be the correct one

Hi, I was noticing that our debian/rules did: ... debian/stamps/build: mkdir -p $(@D) rm -rf debian/install $(MAKE) all DESTDIR=$(CURDIR)/debian/install KERNELS= GCC=$(CC) CC=$(CC) HOSTCC=$(CC) touch $@ install: debian/stamps/build rm -rf debian/install $(MAKE) dist DESTDIR=$(CURDIR)/debian/install KERNELS= XEN_PYTHON_NATIVE_INSTALL=1 CC=$(CC)

Author: tha-guest Date: 2006-02-20 18:22:11 +0000 (Mon, 20 Feb 2006) New Revision: 40 Modified: trunk/debian/control trunk/debian/rules Log: - changed "hotplug | udev (>=0.059)" dependency to "hotplug | udev" - removed "hotplug" as build-dependency - updated rules file to have hotplug & udev etc files installed Modified: trunk/debian/control

Author: tha-guest Date: 2006-03-03 18:08:48 +0000 (Fri, 03 Mar 2006) New Revision: 70 Modified: trunk/xen-3.0/debian/changelog trunk/xen-3.0/debian/control trunk/xen-3.0/debian/xen-utils-3.0.postinst Log: The "Sorry for the step back, but I guess it''s more a 2 steps forwards" commit - Added the xen package again, because we believe there is a valid upgrade

Hi! I was running lintian on our package... Among the copious errors and warnings there are: W: xen-utils: manpage-has-errors-from-man usr/share/man/man1/xm.1.gz 668: warning: can't find numbered character 160 Should we try to fix this, perhaps? E: xen-hypervisor-pae: unstripped-binary-or-object ./boot/xen_pae-syms-3.0.1 E: xen-hypervisor: unstripped-binary-or-object ./boot/xen-syms-3.0.1

Author: tha-guest Date: 2006-02-17 16:52:19 +0000 (Fri, 17 Feb 2006) New Revision: 13 Modified: trunk/debian/control Log: We don''t want to suggest linux-xen0-2.6, because that was just my xen0 kernel package. Modified: trunk/debian/control =================================================================== --- trunk/debian/control 2006-02-17 14:31:17 UTC (rev 12) +++

Hi, I often see this message: Feb 1 14:42:44 vlk dovecot: POP3(obec at nizkov.cz): Mailbox init failed top=0/0, retr=0/0, del=0/0, size=0 Feb 1 14:42:44 vlk dovecot: POP3(obec at nizkov.cz): mbox sync: UID inserted in the middle of mailbox /var/mail/obec at nizkov.cz (68386 > 68346, seq=2, idx_msgs=3) this is on FreeBSD at i386 runnin 1.0.r19 (but I have seen this with all versions of

Hi, I have just looked at the xen source, because I want to finish my work from yesterday and have the hypervisor-pae really build & packaged. It seems so that we have two possibilities to do this: 1) create another dpatch that would patch xen/Makefile in order to have other filenames for the hypervisor when the pae-flag is set. the advanced would be, that if we use diffrent filenames

V4 of the patch, incorporating Bastian's suggestions. Jon --- xen/debian/patches/series | 1 + xen/debian/patches/tools-ocaml-fix-build.diff | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ xen/debian/rules | 5 ++ xen/debian/rules.real | 39 ++++++++++++ xen/debian/templates/control.main.in | 16 +++++

On 01.04.20 14:56, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > On 01.04.20 14:50, Jason Wang wrote: >> >> On 2020/4/1 ??7:21, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >>> On 26.03.20 15:01, Jason Wang wrote: >>>> Currently, CONFIG_VHOST depends on CONFIG_VIRTUALIZATION. But vhost is >>>> not necessarily for VM since it's a generic userspace and kernel

On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 10:13:29PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > On 2020/4/1 ??9:02, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > > > On 01.04.20 14:56, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > > On 01.04.20 14:50, Jason Wang wrote: > > > > On 2020/4/1 ??7:21, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > > > > On 26.03.20 15:01, Jason Wang wrote: > > > > >

On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 10:13:29PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > On 2020/4/1 ??9:02, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > > > On 01.04.20 14:56, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > > On 01.04.20 14:50, Jason Wang wrote: > > > > On 2020/4/1 ??7:21, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > > > > On 26.03.20 15:01, Jason Wang wrote: > > > > >

On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 10:50:50PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > On 2020/4/1 ??10:27, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 10:13:29PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > On 2020/4/1 ??9:02, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > > > On 01.04.20 14:56, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > > > > On 01.04.20 14:50, Jason Wang wrote: > > >

On 01.04.20 14:50, Jason Wang wrote: > > On 2020/4/1 ??7:21, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >> On 26.03.20 15:01, Jason Wang wrote: >>> Currently, CONFIG_VHOST depends on CONFIG_VIRTUALIZATION. But vhost is >>> not necessarily for VM since it's a generic userspace and kernel >>> communication protocol. Such dependency may prevent archs without >>>

On 01.04.20 14:50, Jason Wang wrote: > > On 2020/4/1 ??7:21, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >> On 26.03.20 15:01, Jason Wang wrote: >>> Currently, CONFIG_VHOST depends on CONFIG_VIRTUALIZATION. But vhost is >>> not necessarily for VM since it's a generic userspace and kernel >>> communication protocol. Such dependency may prevent archs without >>>

On 2020/4/1 ??10:27, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 10:13:29PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> On 2020/4/1 ??9:02, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >>> On 01.04.20 14:56, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >>>> On 01.04.20 14:50, Jason Wang wrote: >>>>> On 2020/4/1 ??7:21, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >>>>>> On 26.03.20 15:01,

On 2020/4/1 ??10:27, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 10:13:29PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> On 2020/4/1 ??9:02, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >>> On 01.04.20 14:56, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >>>> On 01.04.20 14:50, Jason Wang wrote: >>>>> On 2020/4/1 ??7:21, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >>>>>> On 26.03.20 15:01,

On 2020/4/1 ??9:02, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > On 01.04.20 14:56, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >> On 01.04.20 14:50, Jason Wang wrote: >>> On 2020/4/1 ??7:21, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >>>> On 26.03.20 15:01, Jason Wang wrote: >>>>> Currently, CONFIG_VHOST depends on CONFIG_VIRTUALIZATION. But vhost is >>>>> not necessarily

On 2020/4/1 ??9:02, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > On 01.04.20 14:56, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >> On 01.04.20 14:50, Jason Wang wrote: >>> On 2020/4/1 ??7:21, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >>>> On 26.03.20 15:01, Jason Wang wrote: >>>>> Currently, CONFIG_VHOST depends on CONFIG_VIRTUALIZATION. But vhost is >>>>> not necessarily

Hi. HOSTCC should be used to set HOSTCFLAGS instead of CC. There is a case where HOSTCC doesn''t accept -Wdeclaration-after-statement, while CC does. It results in a compilation error. This patch fixes it Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@valinux.co.jp> -- diff -r 94cb428d363d -r 164e8408c67a Config.mk --- a/Config.mk Mon Dec 12 15:20:51 2005 +0900 +++ b/Config.mk Mon Dec