similar to: r160 - trunk/xen-3.0/debian

Package: xen-utils-3.0 Version: 3.0.2+hg9656-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When xend starts: [2006-05-22 22:07:18 xend] INFO (SrvDaemon:278) Xend Daemon started [2006-05-22 22:07:18 xend] INFO (SrvDaemon:282) Xend changeset: Thu Apr 27 09:58 :50 2006 +0100 . [2006-05-22 22:07:18 xend] ERROR (SrvDaemon:292) Exception starting xend ((111,

Author: acid Date: 2006-02-16 10:45:13 +0000 (Thu, 16 Feb 2006) New Revision: 3 Modified: trunk/changelog trunk/control Log: - Change maintainer and add uploaders field - Prepare changelog for new upload Modified: trunk/changelog =================================================================== --- trunk/changelog 2006-02-15 23:05:09 UTC (rev 2) +++ trunk/changelog 2006-02-16 10:45:13

Package: xen-3.0 Version: 3.0.2+hg9697-1 Severity: important Hello, There was a problem while autobuilding your package: > Automatic build of xen-3.0_3.0.2+hg9697-1 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.49 > Build started at 20060725-0410 > ****************************************************************************** ... > CFLAGS="-O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -DNDEBUG -m32 -march=i686 -Wall

Package: xen-3.0 Severity: important While booting the DomU, it sometimes crashes, especially if the vif-device is not up yet. I managed to get the console output (xm console test), which I'll attach to this bug report. It seems it is some kernel bug, but I'm not sure. If you need more information, please tell me how to get it, and I will try to post it. -- System Information: Debian

Hi folks Some proposed changes: * Fixiate the API/ABI of some libs, for the stable version, including - libxenctrl, - libxenstat, - libxenstore. As upstream don't know what abinames are for, roll own abinames. * Add libxenctrlX, libxenstatX, libxenstoreX, if abinames may be different or libxenX if the abinames should the same for all libs. * Add libxen-dev including - static

Greetings Debian Xen team, I spent a weekend getting 3.0.2-testing building and thought i'd share the love. Manoj and I are already working to update make-kpkg for the new Xen architecture. My repo is at: http://debian.thoughtcrime.co.nz/debian/ I have posted a Breezy-centric howto for this build at: http://debian.thoughtcrime.co.nz/debian/README.txt Hope you enjoy it, and hope we can

Package: xen-hypervisor-3.2-1-amd64 Version: 3.2.0-5 Severity: important The hypervisor loads OK but then fails to load my dom0 kernel. I get an erorr message "not an ELF binary" followed after 5s by a hypervisor reboot. /boot/grub/grub.cfg contains: menuentry "Debian GNU/Linux, Xen 3.2-1-amd64, Linux 2.6.22-3-vserver-amd64 (single-user mode)" { set root=(hd0,1)

# xm create -c vm01.cfg Error: Cannot open config file "vm01.cfg" www:/var/log/xen# xm create -c /etc/xen/auto/vm01.cfg Using config file "/etc/xen/auto/vm01.cfg". Error: (22, 'Invalid argument') # xm log [2006-10-24 16:16:30 xend.util.security 29229] INFO (__init__:1072) Resource label file not found. [2006-10-24 16:16:30 xend.util.security 29229] INFO

Hi everybody! At least xen 3.0 packages seem to be working, tested, and in a pretty good shape... (I haven't personally tested xen-unstable, so I cannot say) I propose releasing rev150 in unstable or at least experimental in the next few days... No, this is not a late april's fool... :D Comments? Ideas? Suggestions? Rants? Guido

Hi folks There are still some solutions missing in both trunk trees: - Patches from trunk (3.0) - udev symlink handling (both) A package is not allowed to put symlinks into /etc/udev/rules.d, it have to create it on the first installation and remove it on purge. - postint script needs to create /var/lib/xenstored (both) - initscript needs to create /var/run/xenstored (both) /var/run may be

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Hello, Please consider removing xen. New xen-3.0 splited packages are upcoming, making this one obsolete. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou // <julien@danjou.info> http://julien.danjou.info // 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD // The more we fly, the more we climb, the more we know that heaven is a lie. -------------- next part

Hi! This might be fixed by upstream changeset 9669, even though I'm not completely sure... I will test and report back! Guido

Author: ultrotter Date: 2006-02-17 06:56:29 +0000 (Fri, 17 Feb 2006) New Revision: 9 Modified: trunk/debian/changelog trunk/debian/control Log: Change the version and debian revision, as agreed on the ML Start tracking the bugs that need to be closed on upload Modified: trunk/debian/changelog =================================================================== --- trunk/debian/changelog

Dear Debian Xen Team, The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s) you maintain in Debian: === xen-unstable: = This package has not been in testing for 353 days. = This package has not been able to migrate from unstable to testing for 353 days. See <http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=xen-unstable> This is an automated mail. These mails are sent

Hello, We [the Debian Xen package team] are currently working on Xen packages, and are planning to include them into Debian. A current issue in Xen, is the libc problem. From the Xen wiki [1]: "Xen uses segmentation to provide protection of the memory used for the hypervisor. This results in some performance issues since wrap-around segments as used by glibc need expensive extra handling.

Package: xen-utils-3.0 Version: 3.0.2+hg9681-1 Severity: important When trying to install xen-utils, I get the following message: Unpacking xen-utils-3.0 (from .../xen-utils-3.0_3.0.2+hg9681-1_i386.deb) ... Setting up xen-utils-3.0 (3.0.2+hg9681-1) ... Starting XEN: invoke-rc.d: initscript xend, action "start" failed. dpkg: error processing xen-utils-3.0 (--configure): subprocess

Package: xen Severity: wishlist I'm not maintaining xen anymore, so please remove me from uploaders. Cheers, -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell:

Okay since we have a few more people on the list now I see I wanted to get peoples input on a couple things. First of all, I'd like to work on general consensus so I'd like to see what people think of having the list setup to reply back to the list. I know some lists use this and some don't so I'd like to get input on the matter. I'd also like to get input on choice

Hi, One last thought... We haven't heard anything back from Bastian (for which I'm sorry, I would really have liked if he had joined us) and in the meantime consensus seem to have formed on -kernel and -devel, or at least there was no more answers... Which means at least people don't disagree strongly with the conclusions taken... In the meantime, though, there's still the upload

I am using the "tha" Xen packages from http://packages.debianbase.de/sarge/amd64/xen3/ However, I noticed that some new packages have been uploaded into the NEW queue. What I am wondering is if/when/where the Sarge packages will be made available. If there is no current plan to make them available, I would be happy to help in any way that I can. -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez