similar to: Deleting voicemail by program

Here is something I wrote years ago. I expect you can adjust it for your needs # cat remove_blank_vmail #!/bin/bash # remove_blank_vmail takes arguments as voicemail boxes and removes messages with audio files shorter then MINSIZE (in bytes) #---------------------------------------------------------------------- # Description: # Author: John Harragin Monroe-Woodbury CSD # Created at: Thu Nov 6

Sorry to write twice in one day--I am a relative newbie to some of these parts of R, and I am pulling my hair out! B/c I am preparing a file to use WINBUGS I am cross-posting to the BUGS group as well, in case anyone there has some ideas on this. I've got a large SAS dataset that I want to put in R form to more easily use the file with the hierarchical modeling software WINBUGS. It has

On 05/01/2016 01:57 AM, Leon Fauster wrote: > Am 01.05.2016 um 06:43 schrieb Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net>: >> On 04/30/2016 08:56 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: >>> On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> For e-mail sent to people, yes. >>>> >>>> But for what

Greetings R users, I am trying to renumber my groups within the file shown below. The groups are currently set as 8,9,10,etc. I would like to renumber this as 1,2,3,etc. I have searched the help files and only come across using the rownames to renumber the values but I need to match values. Any assistance is always appreciated, Regards, Charles structure(list(Group = structure(c(1L, 1L, 1L,

On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Adam Rosi-Kessel<adam at rosi-kessel.org> wrote: > The only issue I'm noticing is ogginfo reports: > > Warning: sequence number gap in stream 1. Got page 14 when expecting > page 2. Indicates missing data. > Warning: discontinuity in stream (1) I'd guess this is flagging the data that was overwritten by the bad tagging code. Some

I threw together a web gui for the static database configuration over the last couple of days. I built it using mod perl and the template toolkit. If enough people show an interest in this I'll put up a distribution, although it could take a few days. The interface is as generic as possible so you can throw pretty much any asterisk .conf file in and it works. The interface assumes you

ogg.k.ogg.k at googlemail.com wrote, on 7/14/2009 7:16 AM: >> easy to replace. The second packet is the metadata, which we can lose. >> It's just the third packet that needs to be reconstructed. After that, >> you could start at any packet division in the rest of the file and it >> would play fine? So this generic restore tool that I'm positing would >> just

As stated in an earlier email, I am working on getting break/continue to work correctly for my backend, but I ran into another issue with codegen and the CFG. It seems that code gen is not done based on the CFG, but rather on the block numbers, and the function call MachineFunction::RenumberBlocks doesn't renumber the blocks based on the CFG. So how can I modify the CFG so that when codegen

On Oct 13, 2008, at 5:14 PMPDT, Villmow, Micah wrote: > As stated in an earlier email, I am working on getting break/ > continue to work correctly for my backend, but I ran into another > issue with codegen and the CFG. It seems that code gen is not done > based on the CFG, but rather on the block numbers, and the function > call MachineFunction::RenumberBlocks doesn’t

But, the branch folding pass, or whatever passes are supposed to reorder the blocks based on the CFG, are not doing so in this case. Otherwise there is no way that blocks 2 and 4 should be printing out before blocks 3 & 5. Renumber blocks just seems to reorder the values based on their pre-set block number, but when the CFG is modified these number should modified also to follow the new

HI all, Is there a renumbering function in R? I would like to renumber the following id numbers *Input file * Id Father Mother 123 0 0 124 0 0 125 123 124 126 123 0 127 125 126 128 0 127 130 123 125 *Output* Id Father Mother 1 0 0 2 0 0 3 1 2 4 1 0 5 3 4 6 0 7 7 1 2 Any help is highly appreciated in Advance Val K [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hey all I am having instances where voicemail boxes will have a 00001 message and no 00000 message this causes the user to be told that they have a message that they can't get at. If I renumber the messages manually to start with the 00000 numbering then the user can get their messages. What could be causing this and how can I get it out of the system. Is there a patch I can apply to the

*@home has this for it's incoming fax macro --- start snip --- [ext-fax] exten => in_fax,1,GotoIf($[${FAX_RX} = system]?2:analog_fax,1) exten => in_fax,2,Macro(faxreceive) exten => in_fax,3,system(tiff2ps -2eaz -w 8.5 -h 11 ${FAXFILE} | ps2pdf ${FAXFILE}.pdf) exten => in_fax,4,system(mime-construct --to ${EMAILADDR} --subject "Fax from ${CALLERIDNUM}

Anyone know if #include works in ael yet? extensions.ael: #include "inc/pbx/global.conf" context test_context { }; *CLI> ael reload May 30 13:56:45 NOTICE[8516]: pbx_ael.c:1120 handle_root_token: Unknown root token '#include' May 30 13:56:45 WARNING[8516]: pbx.c:3758 ast_merge_contexts_and_delete: Requested contexts didn't get merged

Hi, Dovecot (at least versions 0.99.10.4, 0.99.11, 1.0rc15, rc17 and rc18) allows message Unique Identifiers to be an unsigned 32 bit value, so something like "X-UID: 4085788205" is allowed. Some IMAP clients I've tested (Thunderbird 1.5.0.9, SquirrelMail 1.4.9a/PHP 4.3.2) appear to use signed 32 bit identifiers and request the above message as UID 2147483647 (max signed 32 bit

On Oct 14, 2008, at 9:16 AM, Villmow, Micah wrote: > But, the branch folding pass, or whatever passes are supposed to > reorder the blocks based on the CFG, are not doing so in this case. > Otherwise there is no way that blocks 2 and 4 should be printing out > before blocks 3 & 5. Renumber blocks just seems to reorder the > values based on their pre-set block number,

I've asked a couple of other questions on here, which people have kindly answered and I'm waiting for the opportunity to implement what they have suggested. In the meantime: We are running out of IP addresses! We currently use 192.168.2.0/24 and it's proving to not be enough addresses. I'm considering changing to 192.168.4.0/22 to virtually quadruple the number of addresses we

Monty Montgomery wrote, on 7/14/2009 1:44 AM: > On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 1:41 AM, Erik de Castro > Lopo<mle+la at mega-nerd.com> wrote: >> Monty Montgomery wrote: >> >>> Yes. Without the first three packets (which hold all the codec >>> settings and all the instruction how to handle the subsequent packets) >>> the rest of the stream is gibberish.

I'm targeting a language that uses virtual registers and not physical registers. So the easiest way to implement this is to use virtual registers, except that they are being restarted after each function and clobbering registers in previous functions. For example: start function 0 r1024 = mov %var0.0 r1025 = mov %var0.1 lots of intermediate code call function1 w/ 3 parameters more

Hi, I'm working on the implementation of Extended Linear Scan register allocator as described by Sarkar & Bodik. One of the interesting features of their algorithm is the possibility to allocate different physical registers to different live-ranges of the same LiveInterval. Of course, it may require some glue code to be inserted in cases, where different physical regs were assigned to