similar to: Unbootable system recovery

Hello, I''m using Xen 4.0.0 compiled from source with the 2.6.31.13 kernel that it pulls down on its own. I added support for the aacraid driver to the kernel using ''make menuconfig'' from the build-linux-2.6-pvops_x86_64 subdirectory, and then built and installed the whole thing using ''make install'' from the xen-4.0.0 directory. I compiled this

I'm trying to use the Dell/Redhat CLI to manage a pair of mirrored disks in a Dell PowerEdge 2650 but I get: FASTCMD> open afa0 Executing: open "afa0" Command Error: <The driver could not execute the requested IOCTL SENDFIB, 22=Invalid argument.> I have "options AAC_COMPAT_LINUX" in the kernel config and dmesg shows: aac0: <Dell PERC 3/Di> mem

I have just built a new SunFire X4100 server with an Adaptec 2230SLP RAID card using FreeBSD 6.2-PRE kernel (from September 20). Everything is working extremely well except I cannot run the aaccli utility on this controller. When I try to open the controller, it gives this error: Command Error: <The current AFAAPI.DLL is too old to work with the current controller software.> On

this is off list on purpose ? > run zpool import, it will search all attached storage and give you a list > of availible pools. then run zpool import poolname or add a -f if you > didn''t export before the install/upgrade. assume worst case someone walks up to you and drops an array on you. They say "its ZFS an'' I need that der stuff ''k? " all

Recent SUP. Installed on Dell PowerEdge 4600. Getting tons of: Sep 30 12:23:16 zige /kernel: bge0: gigabit link up Sep 30 12:23:46 zige last message repeated 98 times Also getting some TCP retransmits. This causes noticable delays in pretty much everything I do now. Not a problem prior to the SUP. I was on 4.8-STABLE before. When pulling/replacing cables, it went into a mode where it would

Hi, I have been wrestling with ZFS issues since yesterday when one of my disks sort of died. After much wrestling with "zpool replace" I managed to get the new disk in and got the pool to resilver, but since then I have one error left that I can''t clear: pool: data state: ONLINE status: One or more devices has experienced an error resulting in data corruption.

Gagan: Throwing my $0.02 in -- It depends on the system environment of how you are planning on deploying Gluster (and/or Ceph). I have Ceph running on my three node HA Proxmox cluster using three OASLOA Mini PCs that only has the Intel N95 Processor (4-core/4-thread) with 16 GB of RAM and a cheap Microcenter store brand 512 GB NVMe M.2 2230 SSD and my Ceph cluster has been running without any

Hello everybody, just to let you know what happened in the meantime: I was able to open a Service Request at Oracle. The issue is a known bug (Bug 6742788 : assertion panic at: zfs:zap_deref_leaf) The bug has bin fixed (according to Oracle support) since build 164, but there is no fix for Solaris 11 available so far (will be fixed in S11U7?). There is a workaround available that works

Gagan: I actually tried what Alexander mentioned below, as a separate experiment. I have two AMD Ryzen 9 5950X compute nodes and one AMD Ryzen 9 7950X compute node, and each node has 128 GB of RAM and also a Mellanox ConnectX-4 100 Gbps Infiniband network card, and I was using I think one Intel 670p 1 TB NVMe SSD and two Silicon Power US70 1 TB NVMe SSD. >From the Ceph perspective, giving it

Hi, I'm wondering if anyone can diagnose the following errors from my log.smbd: ------------ smbd version 2.2.3 started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2002 [2002/02/21 12:04:19, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(475) tdb(/usr/local/samba/var/locks/connections.tdb): tdb_oob len 1111638618 beyond eof at 8192 [2002/02/21 12:04:19, 0] smbd/connection.c:claim_connection(188)

On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 02:44:28PM +0530, gagan tiwari wrote: > HI Alexander, > Thanks for the update. Initially, I also > thought of deploying Ceph but ceph is quite difficult to set-up and manage. > Moreover, it's also hardware demanding. I think it's most suitable for a > very large set-up with hundreds of clients. I strongly disagree. I

Hi All, I''ve just built an 8 disk zfs storage box, and I''m in the testing phase before I put it into production. I''ve run into some unusual results, and I was hoping the community could offer some suggestions. I''ve bascially made the switch to Solaris on the promises of ZFS alone (yes I''m that excited about it!), so naturally I''m looking

Hi, I've installed a FreeBSD (stable 9.2) as a guest on ESXi 5.5. I've added Adaptec Controller via passthrough. Unfortunately FreeBSD does not show hard drives. Any clue? aac0: <Adaptec RAID 5805> mem 0xfd200000-0xfd3fffff irq 18 at device 0.0 on pci3 aac0: Enabling 64-bit address support aac0: Enable Raw I/O aac0: Enable 64-bit array aac0: New comm. interface enabled aac0:

Hi, I have installed b_78 on a Dell 2950 and booting to bare metal works fine but when I try to boot using the grub entry Solaris xVM it will boot to the point where it displays the uname info and then just stays there. It will not boot past that point. I have enabled VT technology in the BIOS (but only after the installation). Where/what can I look at to trouble shoot this? I am new to xen and

Hi, I had 6 crash in 3 hours with exactly the same messages is my aac controler dead ? aac0: COMMAND 0xc4c9d900 TIMEOUT AFTER 512 SECONDS aac0: WARNING! Controller is no longer running! code= 0x100 Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode cpuid = 0; apic id = 01 fault virtual address = 0x5a fault code = supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer =

Yesterday morning I awoke to alerts from my SAN that one of my OS disks was faulty, FMA said it was in hardware failure. By the time I got to work (1.5 hours after the email) ALL of my pools were in a degraded state, and "tank" my primary pool had kicked in two hot spares because it was so discombobulated. ------------------- EMAIL ------------------- List of faulty resources:

Hi, I am running a Xeon with hyperthreading support. Until last week's HTT modifications, according to ps(1) and top(1) both logicals CPUs were in use. (Processes in CPU0 and CPU1 state; "C" column showing "0" or "1".) This has changed with a recent -STABLE kernel which includes last week's changes to HTT (removing "options HTT"). I am only seeing

Hello, My server is experiencing occasional kernel panics when under moderate load. I'm attaching a crash dump and the dmesg output. I'm not sure how to read the kernel backtrace but it looks like the Intel NIC (em0) caused the problem. Occasionally, I used to get a "em0: watchdog timeout -- resetting" error message, but I never had a kernel panic. The problem started last

Im trying to run this program called Thinkboxx and wen it tryes to comunicate over the comm port it hangs. Here are som output to read. earlier on i get: Call kernel32.VirtualAlloc(43050000,00001000,00001000,00000004) ret=0058557c Ret kernel32.VirtualAlloc() retval=43050000 ret=0058557c thats from vhere the com port gets an virtual memory space, i think. and in the end i have: Call

A previous issue has popped up and once again I'm out of ideas. During the evenings it seems that the TDM channels will spike (dahdi_monitor) and will refuse to listen for audio of any type, this includes DTMF. The only resolution I know of is to stop Asterisk and restart the dahdi service, but that's not a solution. All channels look like this, even the FXS. [root at asterisk Hardware]#