similar to: [Bug 1501] issue with DNAT port range

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1501 --- Comment #8 from marco.drummer at outlook.com --- (In reply to Phil Sutter from comment #7) I am currently using iptables v1.8.7 (nf_tables) on Ubuntu 22.04.2 LTS Almost all of my rules are converted to nft to make use of the advantages and simplifications in syntax. However since shifted port ranges are still not available I still have a

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1501 Phil Sutter <phil at nwl.cc> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |phil at nwl.cc --- Comment #7 from Phil Sutter <phil at nwl.cc> --- Hi, (In reply to marco.drummer from comment

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1751 Bug ID: 1751 Summary: ip6tables-restore doesn't restore counters Product: iptables Version: 1.8.x Hardware: x86_64 OS: Ubuntu Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: iptables-restore Assignee: netfilter-buglog

Hi All, I implemented a standalone ruby program that helps to my RoR app to execute processes in background, the web app adds a request to the ruby program, then this spawns a thread and the web app monitors the status until the process is completed. All things work perfect and nice. But, I noted that I''m getting multiple DB idle connections, I think (not sure) this behavior is OK

Hi, I'm using Asterisk 1.2.3 with the asterisk-oh323 channel driver, version 0.7.3. Pwlib is V1.8.7 an OpenH323 is V1.15.6. Following CallFlow: SIP-UA -> OpenSER -> * -> CCM OpenSER routes all calls with prefix 60 to Asterisk, where I've configured following extension: exten => _60.,1,Dial(OH323/${EXTEN:2}@v.w.x.y) v.w.x.y is a Cisco Callmanager where Asterisk is

Hi all i have been succesfully using OpenH323 (oh323) for a few months. the versions are: asterisk CVS HEAD 19-07-2005, OpenH323 v1.13.5, PWlib v1.6.6, asterisk-oh323-0.7.2-pre1 I now have moved to Asterisk 1.2.4, so as per the directions i am using: Asterisk 1.2.4 pwlib_Mimas_patch2 openh323_Mimas_rc2 asterisk-oh323-0.7.3 The problem is that when asterisk starts it fails on loading the module

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1501 --- Comment #6 from marco.drummer at outlook.com --- Any update on this after nearly 6 months? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1481 Bug ID: 1481 Summary: [ebtables-nft] ebtables -E gives error Product: iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: iptables Assignee:

hello:I used libpri 1.4.12 version with asterisk 1.8.7, after the pcap files, i found thatin wireshark setup message, the number type always changed from subscriber to national number.i have set pridialplan= local and prilocaldialplan=local in chan_dahdi.conf already. because that, the systemsometimes can not make outgoing calls. anyone can clarify that? Best regards, James.zhu Doing

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=850 Summary: DNAT applied even after deleting the IP Tables DNAT Rule Product: iptables Version: 1.4.x Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: iptables AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at

Grant Taylor wrote: > I''ll have to double check some things to make sure that you don''t need > to do any thing special other than just allow the initial connection and > rely on the FTP connection tracking helper to handle all other connections. > > I''ve never run an FTP server behind a NAT, but I''ve never had a problem > with the FTP

Whenever I add or remove a DNAT rule such as: iptables -A PREROUTING -p tcp --dport 80 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.0.1 there is sometimes a delay before the correct nat''ing is done. Can anyone tell me why this is? Is it something to do with caching of routing tables? If so, is there a way to clear them to ensure that the rule takes effect immediately? I am building a simple

-- Can someone please give an example or two how one might accomplish DNAT''ing and ip routes? It appears that the de''DNAT''ing takes place after the routing decisions so when I use something like ip rule from incoming-address table out-route it just doesn''t seem to ever route anything out. DNAT doesn''t seem to keep track of the incoming

Hi, i need to dynamically change the destination IP address of UDP packets for an ongoing UDP flow. That means when the flow starts for the first time no change is needed and after some time a change of the destination IP address must be done to redirect the packets to another machine dynamically. For new flows this could be done using e.g.: iptables -t nat -A OUTPUT/PREROUTING -p udp

Hi, The private adresses (192.168.254.0/255.255.255.0) of my network are sent dynamically by dhcp on my network. The dhcp server is on the firewall which address is 192.168.254.1/255.255.255.255 (this address is static). I''ve got a rsync server on this network which is on a separe server. His address is 192.168.254.200/255.255.255.255 (this address is static). I want that the users

Hi. Contents: 1) Introduction 2) 2 Questions * Introduction: I used this HOWTO to use multiple providers. http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html The box is a load balancer, using the Linux Virtual Server. We have a problem with lost connections, and it seems you get issues when you combine this setup with DNAT [1]. The proposed solution [1] is to use these rules to mark

Hi all, I hope someone here can help me with the following problem: we have a router/firewall machine which connects our local network to the internet. As there are also some servers in the local network working as mail- and webservers, we are using DNAT to make this machines reachable from the internet. The firewall-machine is connected to the internet with two connections, one ADSL connection

Hi This is an odd question. But here it is. I have two hosts both with two nicks physically in two different countries. One host I have DNAT set up on such that all traffic is forwarded to the second host. iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -d 0.0.0.0 -j DNAT --to-destination second_host_ip But what I am trying to imagine is how can I get the second host to un-DNAT the traffic from the

We changed the external and internal IP addresses and now our DNAT entry is failing. Any ideas? DNAT net loc:10.222.66.10:443 tcp 8084 Thanks, Dave.

Hi all, net : internet zone dmz : DMZ zone Lan : local network zone in 1.4.6c this rule : DNAT all lan:10.0.0.1 tcp http - 192.0.0.1 does generate the following iptables rules in nat table : Chain OUTPOUT DNAT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 192.0.0.1 tcp dpt:http to:10.0.0.1 Chain net_dnat DNAT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 192.0.0.1 tcp dpt:http to:10.0.0.1 Chain dmz_dnat