similar to: rsync: [generator] set_acl: sys_acl_set_file(dev/kvm, ACL_TYPE_ACCESS): Operation not supported (95)

Hello, 1) fs acl support I use XFS I did the tests ( https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/File_System_Support ) and no errors [root at dc1ucp ~]# setfattr -n user.test -v test test.txt [root at dc1ucp ~]# setfattr -n security.test -v test2 test.txt [root at dc1ucp ~]# getfattr -d test.txt # file: test.txt user.test="test" [root at dc1ucp ~]# getfattr -n security.test -d test.txt # file:

Hai, ? Im having a strange thing with sernet samba 4.2.1 on debian wheezy. ? I installed 2 dc.s with my scripts. ? i did setup the sysvol replication and now im seeing the following when i create new policies. ? The default GPO's drwxrwx---+ 4 root????????? BUILTIN\administrators 4096 Apr 24 10:17 {31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9} drwxrwx---+ 4 root????????? BUILTIN\administrators

Hello, I got many errors on files when synchronizing the sysvol directory between 2 AD DC with osync : ... rsync: set_acl: sys_acl_set_file(ariane.intra/Policies/{2487894F-DA69-4CE1-82A9-D9B4EFE5D32E}/Adm, ACL_TYPE_ACCESS): Invalid argument (22) rsync: set_acl: sys_acl_set_file(ariane.intra/Policies/{2487894F-DA69-4CE1-82A9-D9B4EFE5D32E}/Adm/admfiles.ini, ACL_TYPE_ACCESS): Invalid argument

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7865 Summary: files or dirs with more than 16 ACLs are not rsynced correctly Product: rsync Version: 3.0.7 Platform: IA64 OS/Version: HP-UX Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org

Hello , ( samba 4.6.9 - centos 6 DC1 centos DC2 ) I tried to sync sysvol as described in https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Rsync_based_SysVol_replication_workaround between two DC but rsync shows some errors like this rsync: set_acl: sys_acl_set_file(apam-ad.apam.it/Policies/{D725AAC4-27E8-46AC-918D-55B560988386}/Machine/Applications/{031B2C75-D832-429B-B4C4-226BAA665E3A}.aas,

I am trying to replicate a samba-4.3 DC [192.168.8.65] to a newly joined samba-4.10 DC. I am using rsync as described in the samba wiki, excepting that I am using a remote shell (ssh) with the root user and password-less logins. When I run the command below from the 4.10 DC I get acl errors as shown below. rsync -XAavz --delete-after --rsh='ssh' [192.168.8.65]:/var/db/samba4/sysvol

>-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: rowlandpenny at googlemail.com >[mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Rowland Penny >Verzonden: vrijdag 24 april 2015 11:06 >Aan: samba at lists.samba.org >Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Strange GPO rights samba 4.2.1 > >On 24/04/15 09:52, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: >> Hai, >> >> Im having a strange thing with

When using the following to keep duplicate files on multiple computers, I find some files have their ACLs changed and cannot then be opened. I am using the following command. My goal is to be able to read/write/edit any local or remote file from any machine. Until recently this worked just fine, but now some files cannot be opened once rsync'd. rsync -avzh --progress --delete --super -A

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7884 Summary: Workaround for ACL problem with ZFS under FreeBSD Product: rsync Version: 3.0.7 Platform: x64 OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: trasz at

kfree() handles NULL pointers fine - checking is redundant. Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <juhl-lkml at dif.dk> --- linux-2.6.12-rc1-mm3-orig/fs/ext3/acl.c 2005-03-02 08:37:55.000000000 +0100 +++ linux-2.6.12-rc1-mm3/fs/ext3/acl.c 2005-03-25 22:41:41.000000000 +0100 @@ -197,8 +197,7 @@ ext3_get_acl(struct inode *inode, int ty acl = NULL; else acl = ERR_PTR(retval); - if (value) -

On MacOS X 10.4.11 PPC /usr/local/bin/rsync --version rsync version 3.0.0pre9 protocol version 30.PR16 Copyright (C) 1996-2007 by Andrew Tridgell, Wayne Davison, and others. Web site: http://rsync.samba.org/ Capabilities: 64-bit files, 32-bit inums, 32-bit timestamps, 64-bit long ints, socketpairs, hardlinks, symlinks, IPv6, batchfiles, inplace, append, ACLs, xattrs, iconv

Have a functional rsync 3.0.6 server but am having troubles preserving permissions from source to destination. On server, rsyncd.conf looks like this (modules are defined but not listed below): cat /etc/rsyncd.conf secrets file = /etc/rsyncd.secrets read only = no list = yes uid = root gid = wheel On client am using -ApXrvvhog option and here are some errors am getting: rsync: pack_smb_acl

Hi, Does anyone have any ideas about trouble shooting the following error when trying to change folder permissions on a Samba Share "[2008/01/18 15:59:42, 2] smbd/posix_acls.c:set_canon_ace_list(2480) set_canon_ace_list: sys_acl_set_file type file failed for file" We are using Version 3.0.24 on Solaris. The share is on a NetApps filer which is nfs licensed. Thanks, Paul.

Best guess.. Can you check this : ( from the wiki ) Good: rsync --dry-run -XAavz --delete-after --password-file=/usr/local/samba/etc/rsync-sysvol.secret rsync://sysvol-replication@{IP-of-you-PDC}/SysVol/ /path/to/your/sysvol/folder/ Wrong. rsync --dry-run -XAavz --delete-after --password-file=/usr/local/samba/etc/rsync-sysvol.secret rsync://sysvol-replication@{IP-of-you-PDC}/SysVol/*

I apologize in advance for asking a beginner question, but I really could not figure this from the manual page. I want to copy some files with rsync, and not copy others. The stuff that I do not want to copy looks like this: System Volume Information/_restore*/RP* WINDOWS/Prefetch/* Documents and Settings/leila/Local Settings/Application Data/Google/Chrome/Application/*/Installer/chrome.7z

Greetings! During migrating i686 installation of ArchLinux to x86_64, all filesystem was rsynced to a new location. Maybe this somehow relates to the problem that has appeared after migrating and that did not happen before: during backuping the system, rsync reports the following error message: rsync: set_acl: sys_acl_delete_def_file(var/log/journal/remote): Operation not supported (95) The

On 3/10/19 9:07 AM, Yassine Chaouche via dovecot wrote: > > On 3/9/19 12:41 PM, Monis Monther via dovecot wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> We have an alias group named xyz at example.com >> <mailto:xyz at example.com>, this alias group has 3 actual users >> a at example.com <mailto:a at example.com>, b at example.com >> <mailto:b at

Hi, These three patches fix the problems in the version two. And them base on the Tao's patches: ocfs2/xattr: xattr improvement The first patch fix some problem in xattr code. The second patch add security EA support. The third patch add ACL support. Best regards, tiger

I am curious to know how did you define the filter on an alias in the first place ? is it a filter defined globaly in dovecot ? I don't see how it can be defined in any individual mailbox. Can you show the dovecot/sieve configuration to achieve this ? Yassine. On 3/10/19 11:40 AM, Monis Monther via dovecot wrote: > Hi Yassine, > > Thanks for the effort, unfortunately, we cannot

I have a domain that I upgraded from a Samba 3/LDAP set up about a year ago. I haven't done anything too interesting with it and it's generally been working OK. I attempted to create a new GPO for my domain. From a Win 7 client I get an error "This security ID may not be assigned as the owner of this object". Thinking this was an issue with sysvol acls, I ran "samba-tool