similar to: drive displayed multiple times

Hi All, ZPOOL / ZFS commands writes EFI label on a device if we create ZPOOL/ZFS fs on it. Is it true ? I formatted a device with VTOC lable and I created a ZFS file system on it. Now which label the ZFS device has ? is it old VTOC or EFI ? After creating the ZFS file system on a VTOC labeled disk, I am seeing the following warning messages. Feb 3 07:47:00 scoobyb

We are using MySQL, and love the idea of using zfs for this. We are used to using Direct I/O to bypass file system caching (let the DB do this). Does this exist for zfs? This message posted from opensolaris.org

Hi, If I add an entire disk to a new pool by doing "zpool create", is this reversible? I.e. if there was data on that disk (e.g. it was the sole disk in a zpool in another system) can I get this back or is zpool create destructive? Joubert This message posted from opensolaris.org

Has anybody encountered this problem? I have a box that has FC2 installed. I wanted to trash the FC2 installation and install CentOS 4. I have a pxeboot/dhcp/kickstart environment and so I tried automatic disk partitioning (clear all partitions and then create new ones), manual disk partitioning but everything else is automated and finally, zero automation, just a manual installation through

Avoids trying to create and replace version.h more than once which led to file-locking errors with multicore builds. --- Makefile.am | 1 + win32/VS2015/celt.vcxproj | 48 +++++++++++++++++--------- win32/VS2015/generate_version.vcxproj | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ win32/VS2015/opus.sln | 32 ++++++++++++++++-

Dear ZFS experts, I have 2 SATA 500 GB Hard Drive on my Dual Core PC I have installed OpenSolaris 2008.11 using Live CD I got from Sun Tech Days in Singapore Now, using all the guidelines I got here at Indiana Discussion, I can''t attach my second drive to rpool to make them mirror Initially I was playing around with similar configuration in VirtualBox, and it does not succeed. Finally

I''ve installed Open Solaris 2009.06 on a machine with 5 identical 1TB wd green drives to create a ZFS nas. The intended install is one drive dedicated to the OS and the remaining 4 drives in a raidz1 configuration. The install is working fine, but creating the raidz1 pool and rebooting is causing the machine report "Cannot find active partition" upon reboot. Below is command

i''ve got a little zpool with a naughty raidz vdev that won''t take a replacement that as far as i can tell should be adequate. a history: this could well be some bizarro edge case, as the pool doesn''t have the cleanest lineage. initial creation happened on NexentaCP inside vmware in linux. i had given the virtual machine raw device access to 4 500gb drives and 1 ~200gb

Hey, I''m currently running on Nexenta alpha 6 and I have some corrupted data in a pool. The output from sudo zpool status -v data is: pool: data > state: ONLINE > status: One or more devices has experienced an error resulting in data > corruption. Applications may be affected. > action: Restore the file in question if possible. Otherwise restore the > entire

Hello! I''am setup zfs / cifs home storage server, end now have low performance with play movie stored on this zfs from windows client. server hardware is not new , but n windows it perfomance was normal. CPU is AMD Athlon Burton Thunderbird 2500, runing on 1,7GHz, 1024 RAM and storage: usb c4t0d0 ST332062-0A-3.AA-298.09GB /pci at 0,0/pci1458,5004 at 2,2/cdrom at 1/disk at

Summary: If you use ZFS, do not downgrade from build 35 or later to build 34 or earlier. This putback (into Solaris Nevada build 35) introduced a backwards- compatable change to the ZFS on-disk format. Old pools will be seamlessly accessed by the new code; you do not need to do anything special. However, do *not* downgrade from build 35 or later to build 34 or earlier. If you do so, some of

Hi! Useful advice, thanks! Actually I had been using foobar2000 to recode, because it just makes it so easy to convert multiple files while keeping the metadata (I confess, I'm a "tagger"). But it's easy to miss some encoder option when being presented some default suggestions in a dialog form... Apart form that I always had the impression that Opus could be quite smart

---------- Forwarded message ---------- Subject: Full Mac report <p>Anyway, here's my full report. I'm gonna recommend the Audion 3 for Mac, and just tell people to follow directions from the dv8 website for the PC. Here goes: Went to the diskset and clicked...got a menu...two Mac options...onc called "Legacy Mac OS," the other was for Mac OSX, which I don't have. So

The ZFS crew might be better to answer this question. (CC''d here) --jc William Yang wrote: > I am having issues creating a zpool using entire disks with a fibre > channel array. The array is a Dell PowerVault 660F. > When I run "zpool create bottlecap c6t21800080E512C872d14 > c6t21800080E512C872d15", I get the following error: > invalid vdev

I''ve seen the problems with bug 6343667, but I haven''t seen the problem I have at the the moment. I started a scrub of a b72 system that doesn''t have any recent snapshots (none since the last scrub) and the % complete is cycling: scrub: scrub in progress, 69.08% done, 0h13m to go scrub: scrub in progress, 46.63% done, 0h28m to go scrub: scrub in progress, 6.36%

Good day. Few month ago I reported bug when vif was added as PIF to database. Now I found way to reproduce this: xe vif-create network-uuid=$NET_UUID vm-uuid=$DOM0_UUID device=1 mac=f4:03:02:01:00:01 xe vif-plug uuid=$NEWVIF_UUID xe pif-scan host-uuid=$HOST_UUID xe pif-list root at lab-xh4:~# xe pif-list uuid ( RO) : 62cdddc5-89ad-38e0-e9af-879df66e409d

Being resilvered 444.00 GB 168.21 GB 158.73 GB Just wondering if anyone has any rough guesstimate of how long this will take? It''s 3x1200JB ata drives and one Seagate SATA drive. The SATA drive is the one that was replaced. Any idea how long this will take? As in 5 hours? 2 days? I don''t see any way to get a status update on where it''s at in the reslivering

We have a problem in that calls are dropped after 15 minutes (on both internal and out going calls, incoming calls do not seem to have that limit) How do we fix it? This is the version on that PBX Kernel Linux(x86_64)-2.6.18-371.1.2.el5 Elastix elastix-2.4.0-8 elastix-a2billing-1.9.4-5 elastix-addons-2.4.0-10 elastix-agenda-2.4.0-14 elastix-asterisk-sounds-1.2.3-1

As mentioned last night, we''ve been reviewing a proposal for hot spare support in ZFS. Below you can find a current draft of the proposed interfaces. This has not yet been submitted for ARC review, but comments are welcome. Note that this does not include any enhanced FMA diagnosis to determine when a device is "faulted". This will come in a follow-on project, of which some

Hello all, I'm looking at setting up a sort of 'appliance' server and as such its really not going to have a lot packages etc. I thought of installing 4.2 on a 1gb USB stick, however, the stick is not even recongnized by anaconda. It did appear when I did 'modprobe usb-storage.ko' as /dev/sdc (i have already have 2 SATA disks which are sda, sdb). Then the disk partitioner