similar to: [PATCH v1 0/5] clean up block_commit_write

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "[PATCH v1 0/5] clean up block_commit_write"

2023 Jun 19
9
[PATCH v2 0/5] clean up block_commit_write
Changelog: v1--v2: 1. Re-order patches to avoid breaking compilation. Bean Huo (5): fs/buffer: clean up block_commit_write ext4: No need to check return value of block_commit_write() fs/ocfs2: No need to check return value of block_commit_write() udf: No need to check return value of block_commit_write() fs/buffer.c: convert block_commit_write to return void fs/buffer.c
2023 Jun 19
0
[PATCH v1 3/5] ext4: No need to check return value of block_commit_write()
On Sun 18-06-23 23:32:48, Bean Huo wrote: > From: Bean Huo <beanhuo at micron.com> > > Remove unnecessary check on the return value of block_commit_write(). > > Signed-off-by: Bean Huo <beanhuo at micron.com> Looks good to me. Feel free to add: Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack at suse.cz> Honza > --- > fs/ext4/move_extent.c | 7 ++----- > 1 file
2023 Jul 02
0
+ fs-convert-block_commit_write-to-return-void.patch added to mm-unstable branch
The patch titled Subject: fs: convert block_commit_write to return void has been added to the -mm mm-unstable branch. Its filename is fs-convert-block_commit_write-to-return-void.patch This patch will shortly appear at https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/fs-convert-block_commit_write-to-return-void.patch This patch will later appear in the
2004 Feb 06
3
Supplementary Group Issues
I was wondering if any one else is having issues with supplementary groups not being recognized. It seems as if Samba is ignoring the sup.groups. I'm using RH9.0 on Intel with samba-3.0.0-2_rh9 and OpenLDAP 2.0.27. When I do a "id -a username" the user is in all the necessary groups but when accessing shares the users' primary GID is used only. For example, uid=1001(jgray)
2005 Oct 03
3
Symantec ghost and CentOS 3.4/4.0
Anyone have any experience getting ghost to do a successful image with CentOS, Fedora, or RHEL? It worked great with RH9, but now a days I find it nearly impossible to get it to work properly. Any tips would be helpful. We spin up a large number of servers on a weekly basis and it would be nice to just be able to image them. Thanks, -Drew -------------- next part -------------- An HTML
2015 May 28
4
upsmon and Chloride UPS
Hi, We have 2 UPS Chloride 80 NET 120 ( a black and white one ) in our datacenter. Could you please tell me if it is possible to use upsmon or other free solution with these two UPS for shuting down servers during electrical lost power before battery crash . Beet regards, Roger -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2023 Jun 19
1
[PATCH v1 2/5] fs/buffer.c: convert block_commit_write to return void
On Sun 18-06-23 23:32:47, Bean Huo wrote: > From: Bean Huo <beanhuo at micron.com> > > block_commit_write() always returns 0, this patch changes it to > return void. > > Signed-off-by: Bean Huo <beanhuo at micron.com> Looks good to me but you'll need to reorder this patch at the end of the patch series to avoid breaking compilation in the middle of the series.
2023 Jul 02
0
+ fs-buffer-clean-up-block_commit_write.patch added to mm-unstable branch
The patch titled Subject: fs/buffer: clean up block_commit_write has been added to the -mm mm-unstable branch. Its filename is fs-buffer-clean-up-block_commit_write.patch This patch will shortly appear at https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/fs-buffer-clean-up-block_commit_write.patch This patch will later appear in the mm-unstable branch
2023 Jun 19
0
[PATCH v1 1/5] fs/buffer: clean up block_commit_write
On Sun 18-06-23 23:32:46, Bean Huo wrote: > From: Bean Huo <beanhuo at micron.com> > > Originally inode is used to get blksize, after commit 45bce8f3e343 > ("fs/buffer.c: make block-size be per-page and protected by the page lock"), > __block_commit_write no longer uses this parameter inode, this patch is to > remove inode and clean up block_commit_write. >
2023 Jul 03
0
+ fs-buffer-clean-up-block_commit_write-fix.patch added to mm-unstable branch
The patch titled Subject: fs-buffer-clean-up-block_commit_write-fix has been added to the -mm mm-unstable branch. Its filename is fs-buffer-clean-up-block_commit_write-fix.patch This patch will shortly appear at https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/fs-buffer-clean-up-block_commit_write-fix.patch This patch will later appear in the
2023 Jun 19
0
[PATCH v1 4/5] fs/ocfs2: No need to check return value of block_commit_write()
On Sun 18-06-23 23:32:49, Bean Huo wrote: > From: Bean Huo <beanhuo at micron.com> > > Remove unnecessary check on the return value of block_commit_write(). > > Signed-off-by: Bean Huo <beanhuo at micron.com> Looks good to me. Feel free to add: Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack at suse.cz> Honza > --- > fs/ocfs2/file.c | 7 +------ > 1 file
2023 Jun 19
0
[PATCH v1 5/5] udf: No need to check return value of block_commit_write()
On Sun 18-06-23 23:32:50, Bean Huo wrote: > From: Bean Huo <beanhuo at micron.com> > > Remove unnecessary check on the return value of block_commit_write(). > > Signed-off-by: Bean Huo <beanhuo at micron.com> Looks good to me. Feel free to add: Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack at suse.cz> Honza > --- > fs/udf/file.c | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed,
2023 Jun 20
0
[PATCH v2 2/5] ext4: No need to check return value of block_commit_write()
On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 11:18:24PM +0200, Bean Huo wrote: > From: Bean Huo <beanhuo at micron.com> > > Remove unnecessary check on the return value of block_commit_write(), > because it always returns 0. > > Signed-off-by: Bean Huo <beanhuo at micron.com> > Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack at suse.cz> Acked-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso at mit.edu>
2009 Jan 14
15
Backport patches to ocfs2 1.4 tree from mainline
Found 15 patches (out of 162) that appeared relevant to ocfs2 1.4. Please review. Sunil
2013 Mar 05
1
UFO - new version capable of S3 API?
I was running the previous version of UFO, the 3.3 one that was based on Swift 1.4.8. Now there is a 3.3.1 based on Swift 1.7.4. The config that I used last time to enable S3 isn't working with the new one, just updated yesterday using yum. I was using tempauth in the old version and I'm still using tempauth. I have a CentOS 6 system and a Fedora 18 system with UFO on them. The
2008 Sep 04
4
[PATCH 0/3] ocfs2: Switch over to JBD2.
ocfs2 currently uses the Journaled Block Device (JBD) for its journaling. This is a very stable and tested codebase. However, JBD is limited by architecture to 32bit block numbers. This means an ocfs2 filesystem is limited to 2^32 blocks. With a 4K blocksize, that's 16TB. People want larger volumes. Fortunately, there is now JBD2. JBD2 adds 64bit block number support and some other
2007 May 16
5
[RFC] pv-scsi driver (scsiback/scsifront)
Hi all. We developped a pv-scsi driver that we refered Fujita-san''s scsi-driver and blkback. (see, http://www.xensource.com/files/xensummit_4/Xen_Summit_8_Matsumoto.pdf) The pv-scsi driver''s feature is as follow: * Guest has dedicated SCSI-HBAs of Dom0. * Guest can send scsi_cdb to the HBAs. * Guest recognises the HBAs from hostno of xenstore. Currentlly, We are
2009 Jan 08
2
[LLVMdev] Loop elimination with floating point counter.
Hi LLVM-ers, I'd like to eliminate dead loop with floating point counter using LLVM, but the following loop wasn't optimized by opt. void func() { float i; for (i = 0.0f; i < 1000.0f; i += 1.2f) { } } $ clang -emit-llvm-bc floop.c $ opt -std-compile-opts floop.bc | llvm-dis define void @func(...) nounwind { entry: br label %forinc forinc: ; preds = %forinc, %entry
2009 Jan 08
2
[LLVMdev] Loop elimination with floating point counter.
Hi Devang, Thanks. Yes, in the case variable i incremented by 1.0f is optimized. I don't know why... Anyway, I've filed this problem into bugzilla(Bug 3299) -- Syoyo On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 12:42 AM, Devang Patel <dpatel at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jan 8, 2009, at 4:36 AM, Syoyo Fujita wrote: > >> Hi LLVM-ers, >> >> I'd like to eliminate dead loop
2008 Dec 22
17
[PATCH 0 of 9] swiotlb: use phys_addr_t for pages
Hi all, Here''s a work in progress series whcih does a partial revert of the previous swiotlb changes, and does a partial replacement with Becky Bruce''s series. The most important difference is Becky''s use of phys_addr_t rather than page+offset to represent arbitrary pages. This turns out to be simpler. I didn''t replicate the map_single_page changes, since