similar to: NT1 SMB1 Updates simplified configuration

hi All, We have a glusterfs cluster with 5 nodes on Ubuntu 12.04 amd64. We use this smb.conf: [global] socket options = IPTOS_THROUGHPUT TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_SNDBUF=131072 SO_RCVBUF=131072 read raw = yes server string = %h write raw = yes #oplocks = yes max xmit = 131072 dead time = 15 getwd cache = yes use sendfile=yes block size = 131072 load printers = no aio read size

I tried disabling SMB1 and enabling SMB2/3 and after reboot, I can't connect to any of my Samba servers...so looks to definitely be a workstation issue. On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Bill Baird <bill.baird at phoenixmi.com> wrote: > Just saw that, as well. > > After running the commands to enable SMB2 & SMB3 and rebooting...no luck. > Will keep searching for other

Just saw that, as well. After running the commands to enable SMB2 & SMB3 and rebooting...no luck. Will keep searching for other registry settings. On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 3:27 PM, lingpanda101 at gmail.com < lingpanda101 at gmail.com> wrote: > On 4/19/2016 3:24 PM, Bill Baird wrote: > > When I search for "smb2", I get nothing in my log file for the NT1 limited >

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi! I just set up a PDF printer via Samba 2.2.5 according to the article given in the German magazine iX of March. Now I have the problem that at the first time I done this a file appeared in the resulting pdfshare (the file created by Word which I test with) but afterwards I cannot get it running again (although I restarted smbd and nmbd). No

Hi, I'm using some kind of pseudo printer on our samba server to automatically produce PDF files. The smb.conf looks like this (the samba server is successfully conteced to an ADS): [global] workgroup = ADS netbios name = pc103.ads.local realm = ADS.LOCAL security = ADS password server = win2ksrv.ads.local log level = 2 winbind

Hi, after an update from 3.0.4 to 3.0.7 Samba does not longer honor the "print command" parameter. I use the parameter to implement a pdf-printer. Before the update, printing to the pdfprinter worked, after I see the following in the logs: --- [2004/09/20 23:00:15, 8] printing/nt_printing.c:unpack_devicemode(2368) with a private section of 708 bytes lpr: unable to print file:

Hello =) I got some problem configuring a pdf printer and make windows to download automagically drivers from [print$] share on my samba 3.0.1 server. Well, I've configured a pdf printer (based on this doc: http://www.linuxgazette.com/issue72/bright.html), tested it and it works pretty well =) To install the printer on windows side, I connect to the host, browse to samba server, right-click

Hi, I added these lines to smb.conf: kernel op locks = false op locks = false strict locking = true so I could see some locks from the unix level. It worked sorta, I see the locks for big files (but not the locks I was expecting), but for little files it shows nothing: # ./lock_list /opt/testsambashare/mattest.doc # ./lock_list /opt/testsambashare/contents.doc 0 22086 W

Hi everyone, I'm having the following situation: I need to migrate all SMB file services to a new appliance that only supports the SMB2+ protocol. Unfortunately, there are still some very old Linux clients ("modinfo cifs" says version 1.60) that do only speak SMB1 and need to access these shares after the migration. Is it possible to have a Linux with a modern Samba

We can't do that until we provide a reasonable way for SMB1 clients to connect, probably via a SMB1 -> SMB2 proxy based on the NTVFS file server (where we had such a prototype until very recently). It won't be perfect SMB1, but needs to be enough for basic operation. I'm quite convinced Samba and SMB1 are critical infrastructure in many places and while we may dislike SMB1 for

Hi everybody, having set up Samba 4.12.6 as DC on Debian 10.5 "smbclient -L dc" give me this: Enter PA\root's password: Anonymous login successful ??????? Sharename?????? Type????? Comment ??????? ---------?????? ----????? ------- ??????? sysvol????????? Disk ??????? netlogon??????? Disk ??????? IPC$??????????? IPC?????? IPC Service (Samba 4.12.6-Debian) SMB1 disabled -- no

Hello all, We have a script that does a nightly backup of a windows server to a linux fileserver. The linux system uses smbclient to make a tarball of the share. I get this error when running smbclient: Domain=[OURSERVER] OS=[Windows 5.0] Server=[Windows 2000 LAN Manager] tar: dumped 56781 files and directories Total bytes written: 9800680960 write_data: write failure. Error = Connection

Hi forks: I've been testing SMB2 with samba 3.6.4 performance these days, and I find a weird benchmark that SMB2 write performance is slower than SMB1 in 10Gb ethernet network. Server ----------------------- Linux: Redhat Enterprise 6.1 x64 Kernel: 2.6.31 x86_64 Samba: 3.6.4 (almost using the default configuration) Network: Chelsio T4 T420-SO-CR 10GbE network adapter RAID: Adaptec 51645 RAID

Hi, We support an older version SMB1 server (propietary implementation) which does not support extended security . Mapping a share from that server, using smbclient, was working before applying badlock patches (to the smbclient) , with default settings in smb.conf. However, after applying badlock patches, smbclient fails to map with default settings. When I set the option : "client ntlmv2

Hello! I tryed to configure Debian Linux file server as Windows 2003 domain member using samba with security = ADS mode and stucked with such problem: File server (fs) succesfully joined my domain with correct user and group mapping (i'm using idmap rid). Users from domain have their unix accounts with <DOMAIN_NAME>\ prefix, i.e for domain user "andrey" i have local unix

Hey guys, I've got another C7 problem I was hoping to solve. I installed appdynamics-php-agent-4.0.5.0-1.x86_64 on a C7.1 host. It's failing to communicate with it's controller on another host. And this is the interesting part. Whether or not I have SELinux enabled, I have apache reporting SELinux problems. [root at web1:~] #getenforce Permissive May 10 20:47:56 web1 python[25735]:

Dear R-dev, I would like to accelerate my R computation by using parallel OpenMP compilers (e.g from Pathscale) on a 2-processor AMD server and I would like to know whether R is a tread safe library. The main kernel of the OpenMP parallelization is a C SEXP function that performs the computational routine in parallel with: ******************* SEXP example(SEXP list, SEXP expr, SEXP rho) {

Hi, I have a glusterfs volume replicated on three nodes. I am planing to use the volume as storage for vMware ESXi machines using NFS. The reason for using tree nodes is to be able to configure Quorum and avoid split-brains. However, during my initial testing when intentionally and gracefully restart the node "ned", a split-brain/self-heal error occurred. The log on "todd"

Hello, I think there is an inconsistency in the handling of the compact form of the row.names attributes. When n is the number of rows of a data.frame, the compact form is c(NA_integer_,-n), as in: > d <- data.frame(x=1:10) > .Internal(inspect(d)) @104f174a8 19 VECSXP g0c1 [OBJ,NAM(2),ATT] (len=1, tl=0) @103a7dc60 13 INTSXP g0c4 [] (len=10, tl=0) 1,2,3,4,5,... ATTRIB: @104959380

Hi Kylie, For your question, I don't think a wrapper can completely solve your problem. The duplication occurs since your variable y has more than 1 reference number( Please see highlighted), so even you have a wrapper, any changes on the value of the wrapper still can trigger the duplication. > .Internal(inspect(y)) > @7fb0ce78c0f0 13 INTSXP g0c0 *[NAM(7)]* matter vector (mode=3,