similar to: zfs as zone root

Hi Guys, I''m playing with Blade 6300 to check performance of compressed ZFS with Oracle database. After some really simple tests I noticed that default (well, not really default, some patches applied, but definitely noone bother to tweak disk subsystem or something else) installation of S10U3 is actually faster than S10U4, and a lot faster. Actually it''s even faster on

Hi, I want to disable extended attributes in my zfs on s10u4. I found out that the command to do is zfs set xattr=off <poolname>. But, I do not see this option in s10u4. How can I disable zfs extended attributes on s10u4? I''m not in the zfs-discuss alias. Please respond to me directly. Thanks Balaji

Hi All, Two and three-node clusters with SC3.2 and S10u3 (120011-14). If a node is rebooted when using SCSI3-PGR the node is not able to take the zpool by HAStoragePlus due to reservation conflict. SCSI2-PGRE is okay. Using the same SAN-LUN:s in a metaset (SVM) and HAStoragePlus works okay with PGR and PGRE. (both SMI and EFI-labled disks) If using scshutdown and restart all nodes then it will

I am curious why zpool status reports a pool to be in the DEGRADED state after a drive in a raidz2 vdev has been successfully replaced. In this particular case drive c0t6d0 was failing so I ran, zpool offline home/c0t6d0 zpool replace home c0t6d0 c8t1d0 and after the resilvering finished the pool reports a degraded state. Hopefully this is incorrect. At this point is the vdev in question now has

Is there any update/work-around/patch/etc as of the S10u4 WOS for the bugs that existed with respect to LU, Zones, and ZFS? More specifically, the following: 6359924 live upgrade needs to include support for zfs I can''t even find that bug ID on bugs.opensolaris.org (or via sunsolve when I''m logged in for that matter) anymore. Basically, one couldn''t put zoneroot on

I physically removed a disk (c3t8d0 used by ZFS ''pool01'') from a 3310 JBOD connected to a V210 running s10u3 (11/06) and ''zpool status'' reported this: # zpool status pool: pool01 state: DEGRADED status: One or more devices could not be opened. Sufficient replicas exist for the pool to continue functioning in a degraded state. action: Attach the

Hi, all, Environment: S10U3 running as VMWare Workstation 6 guest; Fedora 7 is the VMWare host, 1 GB RAM I''m creating a solution in which I need to be able to save off state on one host, then restore it on another. I''m using ZFS snapshots with ZFS receive and it''s all working fine, except for some strange behavior when I perform multiple rollbacks and receives.

I had some trouble installing a zone on ZFS with S10u4 (bug in the postgres packages) that went away when I used a ZVOL-backed UFS filesystem for the zonepath. I thought I''d push on with the experiment (in the hope Live Upgrade would be able to upgrade such a zone). It''s a bit unwieldy, but everything worked reasonably well - performance isn''t much worse than straight

On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 9:37 AM, Bernd Dreyer <dreyerbernd at hotmail.de> wrote: > Hi Gene, > > thank very much you for the answer. > I have trouble with EasyBCD 2.3 on a X64 Intel non UEFI system and dual boot Windows 10 and Lubuntu. So a boot selector with fairly simple OSs. > Both systems on logical drives. You mean logical partitions within the drive. In MBR

There was a log of talk about ZFS and NFS shares being a problem when there was a large number of filesystems. There was a fix that in part included an in kernel sharetab (I think :) Does anyone know if this has made it into S10u4? Thanks, BlueUmp This message posted from opensolaris.org

samba@samba.anu.edu.au wrote: > > SAMBA Digest 1853 > > For information on unsubscribing see http://samba.anu.edu.au/listproc > Topics covered in this issue include: > > 1) Re: long winded printing LARGE files soloution > by Heiko Nardmann <h.nardmann@secunet.de> > 2) Samba replacing NFS > by Jonathan Peterson

Sure, I've renamed it to https://wiki.centos.org/KenDreyer Would you please consider dropping this policy? It's not very welcoming to new contributors, and I don't think it'll integrate well with https://accounts.centos.org/ if the MoinMoin instance can use that for authentication. - Ken On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 10:39 AM Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote: > > On

G'Day Olaf, If this was working before, then it would be this bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14310 I'm a bit swamped right now, per Microsoft the correct fix is for our DNS Management server to ignore these values. Can you see if your error looks like this in the server logs? Andrew Bartlett On Wed, 2020-04-29 at 18:53 +0200, Olaf Dreyer via samba wrote: > Well,

Hi, I restored the last backup with the 4.11.6 setup. This is working fine and i can confirm that my AD is set up with a single forwarding zone, there is no _msdsc zone. On this 4.11.6 setup also the Windows DNS Tool does not complain. When upgrading to 4.12.2 DNS administration fails again with WERR_DNS_ERROR_DS_UNAVAILABLE. I will try the steps described in the MS document? and come back

I have a requirement in my current project to support multiple co-located zones on the same VLAN. Our current deployment OS is Solaris 10 Update 4. I''d like to use exclusive IP zones, but I gather the only way to currently have multiple exclusive zones with interfaces on the same VLAN is through the use of VNICs. From my initial look at S10u4, it seems VNIC support been not yet been

Update SuSE Linux detection. Up to now everything with a /etc/SuSE-release file was treated as openSuSE. With this change SLES based distributions such as "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server", "SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop" and "Novell Linux Desktop" will show up as "sles". The 'opensuse' detection was updated to handle older openSuSE releases as well as

Hi, I noticed that CentOS's vim contains the line "Modified by <bugzilla at redhat.com>" on the splash screen. Should this be removed or changed to bugzilla at centos.com? - Ken Dreyer

One of our Solaris 10 update 3 servers paniced today with the following error: Sep 18 00:34:53 m2000ef savecore: [ID 570001 auth.error] reboot after panic: assertion failed: ss != NULL, file: ../../common/fs/zfs/space_map.c, line: 125 The server saved a core file, and the resulting backtrace is listed below: $ mdb unix.0 vmcore.0 > $c vpanic() 0xfffffffffb9b49f3() space_map_remove+0x239()

I sent this to Brendan but never got a response. Maybe someone else can help? ----- Hi Brendan. I''m trying to debug a problem where I need to snoop the network traffic over a punchin connection, where snoop doesn''t work. I found your tcpsnoop dtrace tool, which seemed like it might be able to do what I need. Unfortunately, it doesn''t seem to have an option to dump

A customer has a zpool where their spectral analysis applications create a ton (millions?) of very small files that are typically 1858 bytes in length. They''re using ZFS because UFS consistently runs out of inodes. I''m assuming that ZFS aggregates these little files into recordsize (128K?) blobs for writes. This seems to go reasonably well amazingly enough. Reads are a