Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "Bug#1036601: xenstore-utils: missing Depends: xen-utils-common"
2013 Jul 19
0
Processed: user debian-qa@lists.debian.org, tagging 714794, tagging 710035, found 668754 in 0.36-1 ...
Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org:
> user debian-qa at lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian-qa at lists.debian.org (was anbe at debian.org).
> tags 714794 - moreinfo
Bug #714794 {Done: Gilles Filippini <pini at debian.org>} [release.debian.org] pu: package sikuli/1.0~x~rc3.tesseract3-dfsg1-5+deb7u1
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> tags 710035 - moreinfo
Bug #710035
2014 Jan 16
0
Processed: user debian-qa@lists.debian.org, found 728743 in 331.20-1, tagging 728743, tagging 735576 ...
Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org:
> user debian-qa at lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian-qa at lists.debian.org (was anbe at debian.org).
> found 728743 331.20-1
Bug #728743 [libgl1-nvidia-glx] corrupts the signal block mask (SigBlk) breaking unrelated
Bug #733816 [libgl1-nvidia-glx] khotkeys launches actions with SIGHUP blocked, leading to unclosable xterms
Marked as
2018 Oct 05
4
Entirely new Xen packaging
I have now finished totally rewriting the Xen package in Debian, from
scratch. Amazingly as soon as I got a package which was lintian-clean
and would install, it worked first time !
I have generated 18 patches to go upstream which I have sent to
xen-devel. There are two more, xenstore ABI patches, which need a bit
of tidying up.
There is still room for improvement but it is now clearly ready
2018 Aug 24
2
Plans for buster
Hans van Kranenburg writes ("Re: Plans for buster"):
> On 08/23/2018 07:12 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > IDK if this
> > should have its own deb. Putting it in the libxenstore one is
> > probably tolerable.
>
> Yes, shipping a 4.x specific file in libxenstore3.0 (which happens now)
> is not right. But, if the library ABI is independent from the 4.x
>
Processed: user debian-qa@lists.debian.org, usertagging 669005, affects 669005, reopening 668748 ...
2012 Apr 24
0
Processed: user debian-qa@lists.debian.org, usertagging 669005, affects 669005, reopening 668748 ...
Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org:
> user debian-qa at lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian-qa at lists.debian.org (was debian at abeckmann.de).
> usertags 669005 piuparts
Bug#669005: uninstallable on sid (might just need require a rebuild)
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: piuparts.
> affects 669005 + shogun-python-static shogun-python-modular
2024 Dec 04
13
Bug#1089033: xen: Please package xen version 4.19
Source: xen
Severity: normal
User: debian-lts at lists.debian.org
Usertags: upstream-trixie
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-lts at lists.debian.org
Dear xen maintainers,
Testing (trixie) currently ships xen 4.17, which, according to the
upstream support matrix [x], will get security support until 2025-12-12.
The latest upstream release (4.19) will get security support until
2027-07-29. I believe it would
2023 Apr 08
0
xen 4.17.0+74-g3eac216e6e-1 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the xen source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 4.17.0+46-gaaf74a532c-1
Current version: 4.17.0+74-g3eac216e6e-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See
2024 Feb 05
7
Bug#1063270: xen: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Source: xen
Version: 4.17.3+10-g091466ba55-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending sid trixie
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-arm at lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
NOTICE: these changes must not be uploaded to unstable yet!
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
2018 Aug 23
2
Plans for buster
Hans van Kranenburg writes ("Re: Plans for buster"):
> This can be done from tag debian/4.11.1_pre+1.733450b39b-1_exp1 (which
> is right now the same as the master branch).
Thanks for doing all this work. I have just sent it to experimental.
I did some reviewing and diffing. I have some comments, or, at least,
things I noticed. None of them were IMO blockers for experimental.
2012 Jan 17
1
Bug#656216: xen-utils-common: unowned files after purge (policy 6.8, 10.8)
Package: xen-utils-common
Version: 4.1.2-1
Severity: important
User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#s-removedetails
Filing this as important as having a piuparts
2024 Nov 11
1
Handling of merge requests on salsa.d.o for debian-xen.
On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 06:03:22PM +0100, Alexandre GRIVEAUX wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Some time ago I created some merge request on salsa for debian-xen:
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/xen-team/debian-xen/-/merge_requests?scope=all&state=opened
These looks like you want to send them upstream instead.
--
WBR, wRAR
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was
2012 Dec 01
1
Bug#694891: xcp-guest-templates: unowned files after purge (policy 6.8, 10.8): /usr/lib/xen-common/xapi/CREATE_TEMPLATES_STAMP
Package: xcp-guest-templates
Version: 0.1-4
Severity: important
User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#s-removedetails
Filing this as important as having a piuparts
2012 Nov 26
2
Bug#694429: blktap-dkms: unowned files after purge (policy 6.8, 10.8): /lib/modules/$KVERS/kernel/
Package: blktap-dkms
Version: 2.0.91-1
Severity: important
User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#s-removedetails
Filing this as important as having a piuparts clean
2012 Jan 13
2
Bug#655714: xcp-squeezed: fails to install due to insserv rejecting the script header
Package: xcp-squeezed
Version: 1.3-13
Severity: serious
User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install due to
incorrect dependencies in the init.d LSB header. Some debian notes are
available from at http://wiki.debian.org/LSBInitScripts
From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
Selecting
2019 Jan 07
2
Bug#776450: Xen PVH support for grub-xen in Buster
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 08:44:50AM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 01:58:19AM +0100, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
> > Ok great. Since I'm not using (and probably not going to use) the
> > multi-stage multiboot things, this is harder for me to help with.
>
> With any luck I should be able to work that bit out myself, since I
> think stable's Xen
2015 Sep 25
4
Bug#799986: xen-utils-common: please create /var/run/xen-hotplug from an init script
Package: xen-utils-common
Version: 4.4.1-9+deb8u1
Severity: normal
With SE Linux it's desirable to give utilities and daemons the minimum
privileges.
That includes not permitting general utilities to create directories under
/var/run.
I think it would be best if /var/run/xen-hotplug was created by an init script
such
as /etc/init.d/xen (or by systemd-tmpfiles when using systemd units).
2016 Apr 17
5
Bug#821254: systemd[1]: xendomains.service start operation timed out.
Package: xen-utils-common
Version: 4.4.1-9+deb8u4
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
I have a server with a large number of domUs set to auto-start. For the
first time I have booted it with all of them needing to start from cold,
but the xendomains service only got part way through.
syslog showed nothing notable about the domains starting?
Apr 16 14:57:45 snaps xendomains[4631]: Starting
2018 Oct 18
0
Ready to test Samba 4.9.1. for Debian Stretch ( or ubuntu 18.04 or Devuan ASCII ) AMD64 only
Hai...
Finaly im passed all errors, some problem with meself.. , some the code. ..
Lots of thank to the samba devs, that gave the clue to fix the last parts. :-)) whoehoe..
Its still in the stretch-experimental repo, and if the feedback is ok, i'll make the final build tomorrow.
Testing can be done with Debian Stretch or Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 or Devuan ASCII AMD64 only.
#setup: get
2013 Jan 26
0
Processed: switching email address
Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org:
> # bugs with submitter debian at abeckmann.de
> submitter 479445 !
Bug #479445 [gnuplot] gnuplot: wrong line numbers for missing files reported during replot
Changed Bug submitter to 'Andreas Beckmann <anbe at debian.org>' from 'Andreas Beckmann <debian at abeckmann.de>'
> submitter 681568 !
Bug #681568
2013 Oct 31
0
Processed: found 728266 in 2.0.91-2, tagging 728266, severity of 701278 is important, found 728158 in 0.9.0-2 ...
Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org:
> found 728266 2.0.91-2
Bug #728266 [blktap-dkms] Depends on obsolete packages
Marked as found in versions blktap-dkms/2.0.91-2.
> tags 728266 + jessie sid
Bug #728266 [blktap-dkms] Depends on obsolete packages
Added tag(s) sid and jessie.
> severity 701278 important
Bug #701278 [src:flush] flush: ftbfs with GCC-4.8
Severity set to