similar to: Panic when ZFS pool goes down?

Hi, I just found out that ZFS triggers a kernel-panic while switching a mounted volume into read-only mode: The system is attached to a Symmetrix, all zfs-io goes through Powerpath: I ran some io-intensive stuff on /tank/foo and switched the device into read-only mode at the same time (symrdf -g bar failover -establish). ZFS went ''bam'' and triggered a Panic: WARNING: /pci at

Hi my understanding is that you cannot remove a disk from a ZFS storage pool once you have added it...but I also think I saw an email from Jeff B saying that the ability to depopulate a disk so that it can be removed is being worked on....or was I dreaming ? What is the status of this ? Thanks Tim -- Signature Tim Thomas Staff Engineer Storage Systems Product Group

Hi, I''m running Nevada 75a configured as dom0. I added a domU HVM running Nevada 75a, on a Sun X4600 with 8 ADM Dual cores. I can get the domU installed and configured, however, I can not get any network connectivity. I followed the steps accoding to documents on Open Solaris. I also followed some of the threads of the list to verify the configuration, but I can not fix the

If it''s of interest, I''ve written up some articles on my experiences of building a ZFS NAS box which you can read here: http://breden.org.uk/2008/03/02/a-home-fileserver-using-zfs/ I used CIFS to share the filesystems, but it will be a simple matter to use NFS instead: issue the command ''zfs set sharenfs=on pool/filesystem'' instead of ''zfs set

On 2/2/2015 8:11 PM, Jatin Davey wrote: > disk 252:1 | 0-0-0 | 9XG7TNQVST91000640NS CC03 | Online, Spun Up > disk 252:2 | 0-0-1 | 9XG4M4X3ST91000640NS CC03 | Online, Spun Up > disk 252:3 | 0-1-1 | 9XG4LY7JST91000640NS CC03 | Online, Spun Up > disk 252:4 | 0-1-0 | 9XG51233ST91000640NS CC03 | Online, Spun Up > End of Output ************************** > > Let me know if i need to

John R Pierce wrote: > On 11/2/2017 9:21 AM, hw wrote: >> Richard Zimmerman wrote: >>> hw wrote: >>>> Next question: you want RAID, how much storage do you need? Will 4 or 8 3.5" drives be enough (DO NOT GET crappy 2.5" drives - they're *much* more expensive than the 3.5" drives, and >smaller disk space. For the price of a 1TB 2.5", I can

whats the state of support for self-encrypting drives in CentOS 6 ? these are becoming increasingly common on both laptops and for enterprise storage (particularlly nearline), with features like instant-erase via key destruction. -- john r pierce N 37, W 122 santa cruz ca mid-left coast

Happy Friday, List! I''m spec''ing out a Thumper-esque solution and having trouble finding my favorite Hitachi Ultrastar 2TB drives at a reasonable post-flood price. The Seagate Constellations seem pretty reasonable given the market circumstances but I don''t have any experience with them. Anybody using these in their ZFS systems and have you had good luck? Also, if

Hi All, Its been a while since I touched zfs. Is the below still the case with zfs and hardware raid array? Do we still need to provide two luns from the hardware raid then zfs mirror those two luns? http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/faq/#hardwareraid Thanks, Shawn -- This message posted from opensolaris.org

Hi List All the imap sync apps I could find requires the username /password credentails to be known before a sync occurs. I have Dovecot using ldap acting as a nearline backup mail server to MS Exchange. Every hour imapsync syncs mail between Exchange and Dovecot. This all works fine becuase the users credentials are known, but when new users are added I would like the process to work

On 9/4/07 4:34 PM, "Richard Elling" <Richard.Elling at Sun.COM> wrote: > Hi Andy, > my comments below... > note that I didn''t see zfs-discuss at opensolaris.org in the CC for the > original... > > Andy Lubel wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I have been asked to implement a zfs based solution using storedge 6130 and >> im chasing my own

In August last year I posted this bug, a brief summary of which would be that ZFS still accepts writes to a faulted pool, causing data loss, and potentially silent data loss: http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6735932 There have been no updates to the bug since September, and nobody seems to be assigned to it. Can somebody let me know what''s happening with this

I just subscribed to this list so in case this subject has already been discussed at length, my apologies. I have been waiting for btrfs forever. I have been waiting for it to become reasonably stable. In the wake of escalating problems with my old hardware RAID setup, I decided now was the time to make the transition. At this point I have been completely transitioned to btrfs for nearly

Ok, so I''m planning on wiping my test pool that seems to have problems with non-spare disks being marked as spares, but I can''t destroy it: # zpool destroy -f zmir cannot iterate filesystems: I/O error Anyone know how I can nuke this for good? Jim This message posted from opensolaris.org

I'm interested in the idea of sharing a bunch of SAS JBOD devices between two CentOS servers in an active-standby HA cluster sort of arrangement, and found something about using scsi3 persistent reservations as a fencing method. I'm not finding a lot of specifics about how this works, or how you configure two initiator systems on a SAS chain. I don't have any suitable

Hi all, Sorry for the newbie question, but I''ve looked at the docs and haven''t been able to find an answer for this. I''m working with a system where the pool has already been configured and want to determine what the configuration is. I had thought that''d be with zpool status -v <poolname>, but it doesn''t seem to agree with the

On 11/3/2017 1:31 AM, hw wrote: >> 2.5" SAS drives spinning at 10k and 15k RPM are the performance >> solution for online storage, like databases and so forth.?? also make >> more sense for large arrays of SSDs, as they don't even come in >> 3.5".??? With 2.5" you can pack more disks per U (24-25 2.5" per 2U >> face, vs 12 3.5" max per

Howdy, I have at several times had issues with consumer grade PC hardware and ZFS not getting along. The problem is not the disks but the fact I dont have ECC and end to end checking on the datapath. What is happening is that random memory errors and bit flips are written out to disk and when read back again ZFS reports it as a checksum failure: pool: myth state: ONLINE status: One or more

So, I was running my full backup last night, backing up my main data pool zp1, and it seems to have hung. Any suggestions for additional data gathering? -bash-3.2$ zpool status zp1 pool: zp1 state: ONLINE status: The pool is formatted using an older on-disk format. The pool can still be used, but some features are unavailable. action: Upgrade the pool using ''zpool

I can enabling 32bit solaris guest on top of solaris dom0, but I don''t know how to enable 64bit solaris guest on top of solaris dom0. what configuration I need to modify?