Displaying 20 results from an estimated 600 matches similar to: "[libguestfs PATCH 0/3] test "/dev/mapper/VG-LV" with "--key""
2023 May 19
3
[guestfs-tools PATCH 0/3] test "/dev/mapper/VG-LV" with "--key"
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168506
This small set covers the new /dev/mapper/VG-LV "--key" ID format in the
LUKS-on-LVM virt-inspector test.
Thanks,
Laszlo
Laszlo Ersek (3):
update common submodule
inspector: rename VGs and LVs in LUKS-on-LVM test
inspector: test /dev/mapper/VG-LV translation in LUKS-on-LVM test
common
2023 May 19
1
[libguestfs PATCH 3/3] LUKS-on-LVM inspection test: test /dev/mapper/VG-LV translation
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 04:08:49PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> In the LUKS-on-LVM inspection test, call the "check_filesystems" function
> yet another time, now with such "--key" options that exercise the recent
> "/dev/mapper/VG-LV" -> "/dev/VG/LV" translation (unescaping) from
> libguestfs-common.
>
> Bugzilla:
2012 May 02
4
[PATCH 0/4] fish: Allow the glob command to expand device patterns (RHBZ#635971).
This patch set fixes a two year old bug in guestfish, namely that the
'glob' command does not expand /dev/* patterns.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635971
Rich.
2006 Mar 02
3
Advice on setting up Raid and LVM
Hi all,
I'm setting up Centos4.2 on 2x80GB SATA drives.
The partition scheme is like this:
/boot = 300MB
/ = 9.2GB
/home = 70GB
swap = 500MB
The RAID is RAID 1.
md0 = 300MB = /boot
md1 = 9.2GB = LVM
md2 = 70GB = LVM
md3 = 500MB = LVM
Now, the confusing part is:
1. When creating VolGroup00, should I include all PV (md1, md2, md3)? Then
create the LV.
2. When setting up RAID 1, should I
2019 Nov 12
1
[PATCH] tests: luks: Test the --key options.
Requires this series:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2019-November/msg00036.html
2018 Jan 12
5
[PATCH 1/1] appliance: init: Avoid running degraded md devices
'--no-degraded' flag in the first mdadm call inhibits the startup of array unless all expected drives are present.
This will prevent starting arrays in degraded state.
Second mdadm call (after LVM is scanned) will scan unused yet devices and make an attempt to run all found arrays even they are in degraded state.
Two new tests are added.
This fixes rhbz1527852.
Here is boot-benchmark
2016 Oct 12
5
Backup Suggestion on C7
Hi list,
I'm building a backup server for 3 hosts (1 workstation, 2 server). I
will use bacula to perform backups. The backup is performed on disks (2
x 3TB on mdraid mirror) and for each hosts I've created a logical volume
with related size.
This 3 hosts have different data size with different disk change rate.
Each host must have a limited sized resource and a reserved space. If a
2005 Nov 02
2
Anything like associative arrays in R?
Let me preface my question by stressing that I am much less interested
in the answer than in learning a way I could have *found the answer
myself*. (As helpful as the participants in this list are, I have far
too many R-related questions to resolve by posting here, and as I've
written before, in my experience the R documentation has not been very
helpful, but I remain hopeful that I may have
2020 Sep 07
9
[PATCH v2 0/7] Windows BitLocker support.
Original version linked from here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808977#c8
There is no change in the code in this series, but feedback from the
original series was we shouldn't lose the error message in patch 7.
When I tested this just now in fact we don't lose the error if
debugging is enabled, but I have updated the commit message to note
what the error message is in the
2020 Mar 30
9
[PATCH 0/7] Support Windows BitLocker (RHBZ#1808977).
These commits, along with the associated changes to common:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2020-March/msg00286.html
support the transparent decryption and inspection of Windows guests
encrypted with BitLocker encryption.
To do the BitLocker decryption requires cryptsetup 2.3.0 (although
cryptsetup 2.3 is not required for existing LUKS use). It also
requires a new-ish Linux kernel, I
2011 Nov 23
8
[PATCH 0/8] Add MD inspection support to libguestfs
This series fixes inspection in the case that fstab contains references to md
devices. I've made a few changes since the previous posting, which I've
summarised below.
[PATCH 1/8] build: Create an MD variant of the dummy Fedora image
I've double checked that no timestamp is required in the Makefile. The script
will not run a second time to build fedora-md2.img.
[PATCH 2/8] build:
2014 Oct 09
1
live migration to localhost with lvm based storage
I have lvm based (thin pool) storage on local disks. I need to move
vps from one vg on one disk to another. Does it possible to migrate to
localhost with blockcopy migration to another vg?
I'm understand that i can move lv from one vg to another, but i don't need that.
--
Vasiliy Tolstov,
e-mail: v.tolstov@selfip.ru
jabber: vase@selfip.ru
2013 Feb 12
7
Remaining btrfs patches
[PATCH 1/7] mount: Add mount_vfs_nochroot
This is significantly reworked from before. umount is gone as
discussed, and variable motion is minimised.
[PATCH 2/7] btrfs: Update btrfs_subvolume_list to take
Already provisionally ACKed. Previous comment was that cleanup could
be tidier. I looked into creating a new cleanup function for fs_buf,
but it isn't possible (or simple, anyway) in this
2016 Feb 23
2
[PATCH 1/2] Revert "ruby: Run tests one at a time, instead of in parallel."
It seems the default behaviour of rake is to run tests sequentially, and
not in parallel (there are separate gems to achieve that behaviour).
Hence just invoke "rake test" to run all the available tests at once.
This reverts commit 8f30c3c3f8c063f7c5ff8c6154d881e07a820251.
---
ruby/run-ruby-tests | 8 +-------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git
2020 Sep 17
13
[PATCH v3 0/8] Windows BitLocker support.
As discussed in the emails today, this is the third version addressing
most points from the v1/v2 review.
You will need to pair this with the changes in libguestfs-common from
this series:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2020-September/msg00050.html
Rich.
2011 May 23
2
How to run the java demo code contained in libguestfs package ???
Hi all,
I would like to use libguestfs to manage the virtual disk images of virtual machines on XenServer, which is a virtualization platform.
When I try to do some test of the Java codes contained in the libguestfs package, the following error promped up:
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: no guestfs_jni in java.library.path
at
2001 Oct 23
2
nice mini-howto
hello,
i am a newbie to this list and i don't know if this has been posted before
(if so, plzz accept my apologies)
i just noticed a nice mini-howto on ext2-ext3 conversion at
http://www.symonds.net/~rajesh/howto/ext3/index.html
i think that maybe a link can be added to this after the download section...
cheers
Sayamindu
*********************************************************************
2009 Nov 18
1
[LLVMdev] Triple for PS3
Hi,
I'm doing some preliminary work to get Clang to compile for PS3 targets. As
an intermediate step in that direction, could someone do me the favor of
reviewing and submitting the enclosed patch, or giving me feedback on it?
Basically, I need to be able to differentiate the triple for a PS3 target.
These are the triples currently used in the gcc-based compiler from the PS3
devkit:
2009 Jun 16
4
confusion on levels() function, and how to assign a wanted order to factor levels, intentionally?
Dear R-helpers,
I want to make a series of boxplots on several numeric univariates with two
group variables (species and population, population nested in species, and
with population as the X-axis). In order to get a proper order of the
individual populations in X-axis, I need to assign a wanted order to the
factor (population). I used the levels() function to do this assignment, but
it seemed
2012 Jul 03
8
[PATCH 0/7 v2] Fix and workaround for qcow2 issues in qemu causing data corruption.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836710
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836913
There are at least two related bugs going on:
(1) Linux sync(2) system call doesn't send a write barrier to the
disk, so in effect it doesn't force the hard disk to flush its cache.
libguestfs used sync(2) to force changes to disk. We didn't expect
that qemu was caching anything