similar to: any 64-bit mini-itx successes

Powerful enough to run a small asterisk server though not sure if the drop down in size from a mini-atx or a micro-atx but I'm sure someone will try. http://www.geek.com/first-look-via-px10000-pico-itx-motherboard Regards, Dean Collins Cognation Pty Ltd dean at cognation.net <mailto:dean at cognation.net> +1-212-203-4357 Ph +61-2-9016-5642 (Sydney in-dial). --------------

I've seen the embedded posts. Is anyone running Asterisk on the MINI ITX? James Taylor MetroTel 3505 Summerhill Road Suite 11 Texarkana, Tx 75503 903-793-1956

-------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Steve Rodgers <hwstar at rodgers.sdcoxmail.com> Subject: Via Mini-itx anaconda install failure Date: Sat, 1 May 2004 14:31:43 -0700 Size: 849 URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20040501/e69b2948/attachment-0005.mht>

Hello everyone, Does anyone out there have actual experience with running * on a mini-itx board from VIA? They look good, but I have some reserves because of VIA's problems with PCI latency in recent years (audio dropouts, wierd things happening). I am looking at the EPIA CL-10000. For $270, I can get a CL-10000 (1ghz C3, dual ethernets, etc), 256mb RAM, and a nice small (12 x 2 x 11)

I am looking into convising the boss to get me a mini-itx system to replace my workhorse notebook (I have to have a corp notebook and I can remote terminal into a Centos server from it). So I have been playing with one mini-itx system (the decTOP) and am looking at my options. I want a fast processor, 1Gb memory, LAN, 4USB, VGA. Wireless and bluetooth optional USB dongles along with a

Hi, I have a EPIA mini-itx board that I have been running Fedora 4 on. I want to install CentOS 4.4 on it since FC4 is no longer supported. The install goes fine but when I reboot the machine after the install I get errors like the following: hda:<4>hda: dma_timer_Expiry : dma status == 0x21 There are other errors about not being able to access the disk and eventually the kernel panics.

Hi Everyone, I'd be grateful if anyone can help with a couple of queries I have. Recently I downloaded Centos 3.3 and cannot get it to install I my system. The system I am using to install is a based on an original EPIA Mini-ITX m/board. At a certain point in installing it comes up with an error saying something like "system not supported". Can anyone advise if they have got

Hello Before I order a Travla C156 case (http://206.14.132.88/products/Travla/c156/C156.html), a Via mini-ITX motherboard (either the fanless ME6000 http://idotpc.com/TheStore/pc/viewPrd.asp?idcategory=50&idproduct=4 or the fan-equipped M10000 http://idotpc.com/TheStore/pc/viewPrd.asp?idcategory=50&idproduct=163 ) , and a PCI FXO card from Digium or OpenVox... has someone already

Just to drag this thread on a bit further ... I've been looking into these little boxes, thinking I could use one as a firewall/gateway. My one requirement is that it would need to have two PCI slots (one can be low-profile), and although I've seen PCI riser cards that can give me two slots, they've been rare, and cases that are suitable (i.e have the space, and back panels are

Hi, As the subject suggests, I am trying to remote boot a Mini-ITX system. I am using PXELinux as the bootloader, and Memdisk (2.11) as the 'kernel'. My ramdisk image is a hard drive image based on PC-DOS. Two things go wrong during the boot process. 1. "INT 13 08: Failure, assuming this is the only drive" message 2. "Loading boot sector... booting..." message,

i had such problems on my mini-ITX. when sharing irq's with video or sound card, network traffic during ogg playing (for example on nfs) or quick moving windows crashed the interface. ifconfig down/up resolved the problem. it has been solved for a while now (i couldn't reproduce this problem) i think. regards, OLivier Le Jeudi 12 D?cembre 2002 03:45, The Anarcat a ?crit : >

Does anyone have recommendations for (or against) mini-ITX platforms to be used with Wildcard X100P and TDM400P cards? I am considering the use of systems using VIA EPIA CL and Epia M as small, quiet platforms on which to host Asterisk.

I've got Asterisk up and running on a VIA mini-itx M10K with a TDM-400 card but I'm having a terrible time with the sound setup. I tried RH9 and Debian distributions, with 2.4.18, 20, 22, 24 and 26 kernels. I've used the VIA drivers, ALSA drivers, OSS drivers and Kernel drivers with varying results. I can setup the audio to work with a few different applications, 2 channels and 6

> > JR Richardson wrote: > > > I?ve got Asterisk up and running on a VIA mini-itx M10K with a TDM-400 > > card but I?m having a terrible time with the sound setup. I tried RH9 > > and Debian distributions, with 2.4.18, 20, 22, 24 and 26 kernels. I?ve > > used the VIA drivers, ALSA drivers, OSS drivers and Kernel drivers > > with varying results. I can

Hello, I'm trying to put together a low cost - low powers PBX appliance for several customers. I have purchased a couple of the soekris net4801 boards and have asterisk up and running on them fine but they just don't quite cut it in the processing power department. I've been able to get about 10 simultaneous SIP calls with simple ulaw (no encoding decoding). While this might be OK for

On 5/16/2020 9:55 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 16/05/2020 14:40, James Atwell wrote: >> >> On 5/16/2020 5:00 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>> On 15/05/2020 19:52, James Atwell via samba wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> ??????? I upgraded two DC's to 4.12.2 from 4.11.6 before I noticed >>>> authentication

Hello, ??????? I upgraded two DC's to 4.12.2 from 4.11.6 before I noticed authentication issues with a couple Netgear ReadyNAS we have. For reference I have a total of 6 DC's with 4 running 4.11.6 and two now running 4.12.2.? I ran the usual ./configure,make,make install from tar without issues. However running samba-tool drs showrepl I noticed a couple errors.? Looking through the

On 5/16/2020 5:00 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 15/05/2020 19:52, James Atwell via samba wrote: >> Hello, >> >> ??????? I upgraded two DC's to 4.12.2 from 4.11.6 before I noticed >> authentication issues with a couple Netgear ReadyNAS we have. For >> reference I have a total of 6 DC's with 4 running 4.11.6 and two now >> running 4.12.2.?

So, having returned from a month's vacation, I'm back to work on attempting to build a set of small form factor CentOS compatible computers. I've really tried to do my homework, but this doesn't appear (at first glance) to be at all easy. It's not made easier by the fact that I have to get it right the first time (and I haven't built a PC in a decade); the time and money

Will the material ever be posted. Looks there is some huge bugs with zfs deduplication that the organizers do not want to post it also there is no indication on sun website if there will be a deduplication feature. I think its best they concentrate on improving zfs performance and speed with compression enabled. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: