similar to: SFTP support for subsecond times

On 5/10/23 4:36 AM, Antonio Larrosa wrote: > Hello, > > This is probably a long email, but please bear with me. I plan to > submit a patch and would like to explain what I will do before doing > it so I don't lose time if there's some flaw in my plan. > > I currently use sshfs to mount directories from some computers and a > NAS into other computers. I recently

On 5/10/23 08:50, Lucas Holt wrote: > On 5/10/23 4:36 AM, Antonio Larrosa wrote: >> Hello, >> >> This is probably a long email, but please bear with me. I plan to >> submit a patch and would like to explain what I will do before doing >> it so I don't lose time if there's some flaw in my plan. >> >> I currently use sshfs to mount directories

using "synchronized" subsecond timestamps imho only makes sense with synchronized time (ntp) through that ssh tunnel, too. and with this assumption a "full VPN ssh usage" instead of "only filesystem timestamps" [maybe trying with target systems without subsecond timestamps?] seems impractical to me. or at least "... [sry, didnt have internet to send, incomplete

Historically the view has been if you want NFS-like filesystem over SSH write a dedicated subsystem.? The OpenSSH project stopped following the sftp spec when it tried to "be-everyting-to-everyone" protocol instead of a clean and simple ftp/scp replacement.? As filesystem sharing protocols have oddies between platforms that add a lot of complexity and are unsuited for the original

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3655 Bug ID: 3655 Summary: Default ObscureKeystrokeTiming makes X forwarding really slow Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 9.6p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: ssh

New to sshfs and new to this mailing list so please guide me if required. Is this a bug? When sshfs is given option -o rellinks, it responds with fuse: unknown option `rellinks' According to my understanding of the sshfs man page and --help output this option a) is valid and b) should be passed to the module, not to fuse. Versions: SSHFS version 2.4 FUSE library version: 2.8.5

On Tuesday, May 19, 2020 1:36:03 AM CEST Warren Young wrote: > On May 18, 2020, at 5:13 AM, hw <hw at gc-24.de> wrote: > > Is there a better alternative for mounting remote file systems over > > unreliable connections? > > I don?t have a good answer for you, because if you?d asked me without all > this backstory whether NFS or SSHFS is more tolerant of bad

Hi there I am wanting to call sshfs (auth via DSA keys) via a rsync pre-xfer bash script, and cannot get something right. If I run it from the cmdline line: env - sshfs usern@server:/share /dir/path -o -o IdentityFile=/tmp/id_dsa it mounts it just fine. (note the "env -" - I specifically tested with no environment to try to make the two situations identical). If I put that sole line

Hello! I have samba share on my sshfs-mounted folder. All works just fine except I can't delete files from sshfs unless they are in 0777 chmodded directory. Even if that files were putted trough smbclient. I can read files, write files (regardless their directory permissions) but not delete them. Here is my share config: [myshare] comment = shre over sshfs path = /home/kli/work/remotes/dev

Hello, Renaming a file via sftp on an sshfs mount resulted in a failure with errorcode 38 (ENOSYS). This is reproducable with openssh release 4.9p1 & 5.1p1 in combination sshfs 2.2 (latest releases). Investigation revealed that sshfs only implements the rename()-call and not the link()-call (used by sftp-server). Attached is a patch to perform the rename()-call upon a failed link(). The

Hi all, I am trying to mount on boot a sshfs filesystem. I have tried this in /etc/fstab backup at myserver.com:/home/backup/myserver /backup fuse.sshfs nonempty,allow_other 0 2 but only works when network works. I have also tried this in my crontab: @reboot sshfs -o idmap=backup myserver.com:/home/backup/myserver /backup but doesn?t seem to work either. What else can I try?

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7424 Summary: -x with sshfs Product: rsync Version: 3.0.7 Platform: x64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: bugs at dotcommie.net QAContact: rsync-qa at

A sample of the data I have is: > head(sensor) logged_on accx accy accz compassx compassy compassz gyrox gyroy gyroz 1 1326561428000 -0.4602 0.8346 0.0936 0.145508 -0.350586 0.259766 59.617390 28.521740 59.617390 2 1326561428050 -0.4212 1.0452 0.1326 0.219727 -0.321289 0.241211 88.695656 27.478260 88.695656 3 1326561428100 -0.2496 1.3416 0.2886 0.214844 -0.326172

Hello, I'm trying to build a sshfs available environemnt. Info: [root at pandora /]# uname -a ; yum list \*fuse\* installed Linux pandora 2.6.18-8.1.6.el5xen #1 SMP Thu Jun 14 18:01:24 EDT 2007 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Loading "priorities" plugin Loading "protectbase" plugin Loading "installonlyn" plugin Loading "fastestmirror" plugin Setting up

On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 05:36:03PM -0600, Warren Young wrote: > On May 18, 2020, at 5:13 AM, hw <hw at gc-24.de> wrote: > > > > Is there a better alternative for mounting remote file systems > > over unreliable > > connections? > > I don?t have a good answer for you, because if you?d asked me > without all this backstory whether NFS or SSHFS is more

> On Dec 3, 2007 5:19 AM, Miklos Szeredi <miklos at szeredi.hu> wrote: > > > Yes it is weird. I hope you can help me with this problem as sshfs is > > > so much simpler than nfs. > > > > Can you please do one more thing: start up sshfs normally, then on the > > server do a strace of the sftp-server process: > > > > strace -o /tmp/strace.log

I mounted vpopmail/domains in sshfs. root at 192.168.239.205:/mnt/disk-b/domains on /mnt/domains type fuse.sshfs (rw,nos uid,nodev,max_read=65536,allow_other) I used qmail+dovecot+vpopmail+mysql dovecot-2.0.beta4. I mounted sshfs with vpopmail/domains directory. my /usr/local/etc/dovecot/conf.d/mail.conf file mmap_disable = yes dotlock_use_excl = yes mail_nfs_storage = yes

Hello, I am investigating a data-loss bug in SSHFS (https://github.com/libfuse/sshfs/issues/72). While the root cause is in SSHFS and has already been fixed, there seems to be some unfortunate interaction with what I believe is an OpenSSH bug: As far as I can tell, when sending a SSH_FXP_OPEN request with SSH_FXF_WRITE (i.e., opening the file write only), and then following up with a

Hi, I created an LXC domain via libvirt (on Fedora 20), but when I'm trying to mount a FUSE filesystem, like sshfs, I'm getting a following error: $ sshfs 172.30.15.2:/<mntdir> /<mntpoint> fuse: device not found, try 'modprobe fuse' first I see that there's no /dev/fuse device. Is there a way to make it work? Can I get it working via libvirt domain xml file

I think it has a lot to do with telldir on an NFS share returning a cookie that is supposed to be unique rather than an actual offset. Problem is, that cookie is stored as a 31bit hash which can then end up as a negative signed offset in Samba which is not handled correctly. The cookies are not necessarily consecutive as you move through a directory. On Mon, 27 Feb 2023 at 19:00, Jeremy Allison