similar to: Hiding files with ZFS ACLs

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9466 Summary: GPFS ACLs are not copied by rsync when copying between two GPFS filesystems Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at

Hi I am accessing files in a ZFS file system via NFSv4. I am not logged in a root. File permissions look as expected when I inspect them with ls -v and ls -V I only have owner and group ACLs...nothing for everyone. bash-3.00$ id uid=100(timt) gid=10001(ccbcadmins) bash-3.00$ groups ccbcadmins staff bash-3.00$ ls -v testacl -rwxrwx---+ 1 timt ccbcadmins 0 Jan 31 16:24 testacl

In our situation, we have users home directories on a zfs filesystem which are available from both nfs and via samba. One of our requirements is that we have to prevent users on the nfs mounted systems from being able to perform a chmod on their own home directory that allows other users access to their home directories. To this end we use ZFS ACLs such that we chown the user's home directory

I'm trying to use zfs acls in solaris 10. I've looked at past posts regarding this and some online help, but am stuck. I'm currently using samba 3.3.9; I've had the same problem with 3.3.7. samba is compiled and running as an Active Directory member server (compiled with ldap and kerberos). The zfs disk is local. I'm not using winbind. I compiled with zfsacl module.

I think the issue may be related to the broken trusts. First of all only two people had specifically reported issues which meant for most people it was acceptable. Then I noticed that some directories seemed slower than others. If I ssh'd into the server and checked permissions, listing permissions on most directories was quick (under 2 second.) On directories that allowed

Does anybody have experience of running Samba on a domain and getting inherited file permissions on a Samba server to more closely match the permissions you would see on a Windows 2000 box? I'm trying to reproduce our departmental folders on a Samba box, running on ZFS with NFSv4 ACL's, but I'm struggling to get inherited permissions working properly when new files are created.

http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=1657 Summary: tests/functional/acl/nontrivial/zfs_acl_cp_001_pos causes panic Classification: Development Product: zfs-crypto Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2

Right now, FreeBSD supports one type of ACLs - so called POSIX.1e ACLs. They are natural extension of the traditional Unix permissions, and for a long time were the only nonproprietary ACL type in Unix systems. Times change, and now there are several problems with them: they never actually become standard (the draft they are based on was withdrawn); this results in minor incompatibilities

ZFS introduces a new and incompatible ACL interface into Solaris and this seems to be not yet fully completed in addition to the fact that is causes a lot of problems for software that needs to be compatible with Solaris-2.5 like star. Proof for incompatibility: create a file on UFS and set an ACL for this file. Use Sun tar cpf out file to archive this file. Unpack this archive file on ZFS

Hello folks, Samba 3.5.6 running and I have following share: [public] path = /data/public read only = No create mask = 0777 directory mask = 0777 directory security mask = 0750 vfs object = acl_xattr nt acl support = yes dos filemode = yes My filesystem ext4 which is mounted to /data supports acl,user_xattr and

This adds make install support, either static or shared, default is static to avoid dependency mess. Index: MCONFIG =================================================================== --- MCONFIG (revision 1009) +++ MCONFIG (working copy) @@ -45,6 +45,19 @@ CRTSHARED = $(KLIBOBJ)/interp.o LIBSHARED = $(KLIBOBJ)/libc.so +INSTALL = /usr/bin/install + +# offset during make install +DESTDIR = +

Hi Folks, I used to run transmission for torrents on opensolaris snv_134. My working zfs was newsan/tmp and when the torrent completed i had transmission configured to move the files to newsan/incoming. I upgraded to sol11exp and the related zfs updates and now the files no longer move to newsan/incoming upon completion. I believe this to be a zfs acl issue and could use some assistance in

Hi, As I was experimenting with snv101, I discovers that every attempt to create a zpool gives this error: #zpool create pool1 c1d1s0 invalid vdev specification use ''-f'' to override the following errors: /dev/dsk/c1d1s0 overlaps with /dev/dsk/c1d1s2 I am testing with vmware, so I used the same virtual disk in a snv77 install, and I don''t get any error.

Hello, After upgrading from Debian Etch with samba 3.0.24-6etch10 to Lenny with a backport of 2:3.4.5~dfsg-1 (with libtalloc2 2.0.1-1), i get a fully working service but with a strange ACL bug : people can create/delete/rename files, but not modify them (error "espace insuffisant pour traiter cette commande" in french, which should translate into "Not enough storage is

Hi Scenario: user steve member of group called staff share called 'reports' with permissions 0750 root:staff When steve tries to access reports on xp or win7 he gets permission denied. We have to set 'reports' to 0755 for steve to have access. No amount of security tab work on the share in windows will allow him entry. We only want members of the group staff in reports but we

HI all, Having fixed the group issues from solaris having a default max of 16 groups I can now locally create and delete files on the solaris box as a domain user However when accessed via samba I can not create new files/folders (although I can delete the files I created when logged on locally) I have created a temporary directory on a non zfs (non acl enabled) file system to see if that

Am 03.01.19 um 16:19 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 15:46:24 +0100 "Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> observation, maybe important: > > Oh, it's more than important, guess where the Windows ACLs are stored > ;-) hmm ... ? ;) >> (share "projekte" works fine, share "QM"

In looking at this further, I?m not seeing how this can be configured as documented and still work. The sieve_pipe_socket_dir setting, as the documentation suggests, appears to be used by the plugin to construct a path to find the ?script? (the socket in this case), and it is always relative to base_dir and must include the contents of sieve_pipe_socket_dir. /* Try socket first */ if (

Hello, if I am right Samba 3.0.23d didn't support ACLs on Suns new filesystem ZFS. Will it be supported in the next Samba version 3.0.24? I found a discussion on "samba-technical" witch says that in the subversion tree support for ACLs on ZFS is available. (http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2006-December/050604.html) But my tests on Solaris 10 X86 failed. I tried

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8948 Summary: ZFS acls are not inherited. Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: ryan at mailinator.com