similar to: PSARC 2006/285 MPxIO Driver Properties

Author: dm120769 Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 95f76d313d17c7e2d368097506e9f4ce5e5920bf Log message: Backout 6423041, 6426345; exposes deadlock Files: update: usr/src/cmd/mdb/common/modules/mpxio/mpxio_dcmds.c update: usr/src/uts/common/io/ib/ibnex/ibnex.c update: usr/src/uts/common/io/tphci.c update: usr/src/uts/common/io/tvhci.c update: usr/src/uts/common/os/devcfg.c update:

Author: ramat Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 4b26d77cdea7130b1da9746af6ad53939d24d297 Log message: 6349232 vhci cache may not contain iscsi device information when cache is rebuilt Files: update: usr/src/uts/common/os/sunmdi.c update: usr/src/uts/common/sys/mdi_impldefs.h

Author: eota Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 5280d884b1432bc97a53a686598dc80c1b1a38cc Log message: PSARC 2006/188 Memory Cache Disable Support on x86 4262085 devmap_umem_setup doesn''t honor accattrp parameter 6212057 ddi_dma_mem_alloc should be able to alloc with cache disable on x86 6397314 iprb calls ddi_dma_mem_alloc() with zero for the data transfer mode Files: update:

We have a Sun v890, and I''m interested converting existing ZFS zpool from c#t#d# to MPxIO. % zpool status pool: data state: ONLINE status: ONLINE scrub: scrub completed with 0 errors on Sun Jul 15 10:58:33 2007 config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM data ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t2d0

Hello experts, My client is thinking about changing one of their servers running Solaris 8 (NIS Hub to mention something) to a server running Solaris 10. The question that i have given is to check the differences or if you wish the status/stability of changing VXvm with DMP (Dynamic Multi Pathing) to a system with ZFS and MPXio. I have made my share of RTFM but not come any closer to an answer.

Folks, I''m trying to figure out whether we should give ZFS / mpxio a shot on one of our research servers, or simply skip it (as we have previously). In Nov 2009 Cindy responded to a thread concerning ZFS device issues, cfgadm, and mpxio: http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/2009-November/033496.html I''ve got an x2270 with the Sun EZ-SAS HBA and external SATA

Hi ! I am using MPXIO for doing multipathing across four HBA''s. Now I need to know how much IO/sec each HBA card is serving. With EMC powerpath installed, we could get this using powermt display every=5. is there any way I can use Dtrace to extract this output ? I guess MPXIO just shows one Device name to the OS so dev__pathname won''t be able to tell me per HBA i/O. Regds,

I''m seeing seriously degraded performance with round-robin SAS multipathing. I''m hoping you guys can help me achieve full throughput across both paths. My System Config: OpenSolaris snv_134 2 x E5520 2.4 GHz Xeon Quad-Core Processors 48 GB RAM 2 x LSI SAS 9200-8e (eight-port external 6Gb/s SATA and SAS PCIe 2.0 HBA) 1 X Mellanox 40 Gb/s dual port card PCIe 2.0 1 x JBOD:

Customer asks: Will SunCluster 3.2 support ZFS zpool created with MPxIO devices instead of the corresponding DID devices? Will it cause any support issues? Thank you, James Lefebvre -- James Lefebvre - OS Technical Support james.lefebvre at Sun.com (800)USA-4SUN (Reference your Case Id #) Hours 8:00 - 5:00 EST Sun Support Services 4 Network Drive, UBUR04-105 Burlington MA

Author: cth Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: b8c908c4899a1b364b3dea12c920c6404bf07886 Log message: 6357763 commands fail w/ no such device on iscsi target when multiple sessions > 2 and target not mpxio Files: update: usr/src/uts/common/os/devctl.c

Here is what I have configured: T2000 with OBP 4.28.6 2008/05/23 12:07 with 2 - 72 GB disks as the root disks OpenSolaris Nevada Build 91 Solaris Express Community Edition snv_91 SPARC Copyright 2008 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Use is subject to license terms. Assembled 03 June 2008

I''m trying to set up a iscsi connection (with MPXIO) between my Vista64 workstation and a ZFS storage machine running OpenSolaris 10 (forget the exact version). On the ZFS machines, I have two NICS. NIC #1 is 192.168.1.102, and NIC #2 is 192.168.2.102. The NICs are connected to two separate switches serving two separate IP spaces. On my Vista64 machine, I also have two NICs connected in

Author: cth Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 8c3216f8ae4cd2c699db490d2a79406f3c420d36 Log message: 6308380 e_ddi_majorinstance_to_path implementation deficient for /devices/pseudo paths Files: update: usr/src/uts/common/os/sunddi.c

Where can I find a list of supported multipath drivers for ZFS? Keith McAndrew Senior Systems Engineer Northern California SUN Microsystems - Data Management Group <mailto:Keith.McAndrew at SUN.com> Keith.McAndrew at SUN.com 916 715 8352 Cell CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and confidential information of SUN

This may not be the answer you''re looking for, but I don''t know if it''s something you''ve thought of. If you''re pulling a LUN from an expensive array, with multiple HBA''s in the system, why not run mpxio? If you ARE running mpxio, there shouldn''t be an issue with a path dropping. I have the setup above in my test lab and pull cables

This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. Send mail to mime@docserver.cac.washington.edu for more info. --1133331701-635408861-993124011=:10449 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII I'm not sure if the warning messages Warning messages: 1: variable 67 is not a factor in:

Greetings, In looking for inexpensive JBOD and/or RAID solutions to use with ZFS, I''ve run across the recent "VTrak" SAS/SATA systems from Promise Technologies, specifically their E-class and J-class series: E310f FC-connected RAID: http://www.promise.com/product/product_detail_eng.asp?product_id=175 E310s SAS-connected RAID:

Greetings, We''re trying out a new JBOD here. Multipath (mpxio) is not working, and we could use some feedback and/or troubleshooting advice. The OS is oi151a7, running on an existing server with a 54TB pool of internal drives. I believe the server hardware is not relevant to the JBOD issue, although the internal drives do appear to the OS with multipath device names (despite the fact

Author: gjelinek Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: b5e2c3c08438c9b843f43151654fa3e4a23793a6 Log message: PSARC 2005/711 Zone move and clone 6292928 RFE: provide faster zone provisioning 4963361 RFE: zoneadm move command Files: update: usr/src/cmd/zoneadm/zoneadm.c

Author: szhou Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 56b02c555bfb41a423c9856c46c8918128e9d3c1 Log message: PSARC 2005/373 Contract for the Miniroot Repository 6263254 console output gets graphically corrupted after the newboot 6270368 grub does not honor vendor option 150 to specify menu.lst file 6271324 boot-archive.xml is delivered into the wrong directory 6271395 grub should show progress