similar to: 6296920 IPsec 3DES can''t be used in two-key mode

Author: markfen Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: ea6646e31b7d6941b25bd7557b7c12a68611b2bc Log message: 6412600 IPsec SOFT EXPIRE inaccurately reports number of bytes protected by SA Files: update: usr/src/uts/common/inet/ip/sadb.c

Hi all. The IPSec part of the LARTC howto is great, but I''ve hit a problem in 7.3. IPSEC tunnels. The example given is for manual keying: add 10.0.0.216 10.0.0.11 esp 34501 -m tunnel -E 3des-cbc "123456789012123456789012"; How does one setup "tunnel mode" using racoon? Trying to setup an ipsec tunnel between two subnets: 10.10.42.0/24 and 10.1.1.0/24 using a

Hi All, In the previous mail, I have sent is only the problem that occurs, because of using IPv6 addresses. But the connection works with IPv4 addresses without any problem. Thanx, Mohan. __________________________________________________________ How much free photo storage do you get? Store your friends 'n family snaps for FREE with Yahoo! Photos http://in.photos.yahoo.com

Hi All, I need to establish an IPSec tunnel between two FreeBSD systems, using IPv6 addresses.The connetcion is host-to-host between two FreeBSD( RELEASE 4.11) systems with KAME IPSec implementation. I tried to establish the connection, but it has some problems which are explained below. |----------------->| host1-[mohan]| |host2-[ram]

hi I''m trying to get ipsec working with x509 certificates however I just can''t seem to. I''ve hit a road block and was wondering if someone could help me figure it out. my racoon.conf (I have it mirrored on the connecting machine. path pre_shared_key "/etc/racoon/psk.txt"; path certificate "/etc/certs"; remote anonymous { exchange_mode

Hi All, I need to establish an IPSec tunnel between two FreeBSD systems using IPv6 addresses.The connetcion is host-to-host between two FreeBSD( RELEASE 4.11) systems with KAME IPSec implementation. |----------------->| host1-[mohan]| |host2-[ram] |<-----------------| host1 IPv6 address : fe80::2b0:d0ff:fe6f:dfa0 host2 IPv6 address :

Hi! I''m testing IPSec tunnels, having the following test schemma: Host A - eth0: 192.168.1.67 eth1: 192.168.10.1 Host B - eth0: 192.168.1.254 eth1: 192.168.20.1 I''ve succesfully configured an IPSec tunnel in order to safely communicate from 192.168.10.0/24 (which is obviously behind Host A), and 192.168.20.0/24 (obviously behind Host B) In this test

Hi all :-) I have a problem with my current configuration of ipsec. I''m using ipsec with kernel 2.6 and racoon. I have two computers linked by wireless cards. The first (192.168.1.1 Zeus) is connected to internet through a DSL modem and the second (192.168.1.2 Memphis) is accessing internet through the first. I want with ipsec to encrypt all datas between the two computers. I can

hi there, I just wanted to share a recent discovery I did on how to setup a secure VPN implementation for linux 2.4.x (I''m using 2.4.20 but it should be working, as far as documentation states, for > 2.4.18) without using FreeS/WAN. The tool (ipsec_tunnel: http://ringstrom.mine.nu/ipsec_tunnel/, by Tobias Ringström) is a kernel module based on ipip and ip_gre. It uses CyptoAPI to

Guys, OK, now that we have the new core contributors squared away, we can go back to finishing the contributors list. There were some people who got added and then there is existing contributors list. I think Darren''s suggestion to wait to add new core contributors is fine (let the new constitution settle down and we can in the meanwhile have a more inclusive look at both rather than

I am trying to set up an ipsec net-to-net VPN and am having problems. Here is a diagram of the setup: LAN A --> Host A ----> Internet <---- Host B <-- LAN B LAN A = 10.10.2.0/24 LAN A gateway = 10.10.2.254 Host A internal = 10.10.2.254 Host A external = xx.xx.xx.xx Host B external (see below) Host B internal = 10.10.1.10 LAN B = 10.10.1.0/24 LAN B gateway = 10.10.1.252 (F5 Big

I've just wrote a lenghty email on Fedora ML as reply to Phillip who seems to be in the same trouble as myself... Found that while searching all mailing list archives and bugzillas I could think off (not really successfully, many people with same problems, no answers other than "works for me" -- glad to hear it works for somebody else, but it would be nice if he/she was a bit

Hi, I am trying to setup an IPSEC transport between a Windows 2000 box and a FreeBSD server for a customer... Both systems are on live public IP's and packets are not filtered by any intermediate systems or firewalls/routers in between. I have the following setup: Windows 2000 box: 1.1.1.2 FreeBSD Server: 2.2.2.3 (The actual IP's have been changed to above to protect the innocent..)

Author: sommerfe Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 262ad2e7d124ee605cafda82de97b85e3c210dda Log message: 6339712 mistaken assumption that (ipsec_mp != NULL) implies packet was ipsec protected trips assert Files: update: usr/src/uts/common/inet/ip/spd.c

I have no idea whatsoever as to why racoon/IKE does not work here. I've tried various how-to documents but found nothing that works for me. Gateway (10.0.0.1) running 4.9-stable. Laptop (10.0.0.10) running 5.2.1-release. Both running racoon-20040408a On the gateway 10.0.0.1 # cat /etc/ipsec.conf add 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.10 esp 691 -E rijndael-cbc "1234567890123456" -A hmac-sha1

I've been using IPSec and racoon alot lately creating tunnels between FreeBSD machines. Everything works as it should once I've got it running. I do however seem to get delays when one, or both ends of the tunnel drop or are rebooted. On reboot, once the machine starts racoon, it takes two or three minutes for the tunnel to come back up. If I stop and restart racoon, it takes only 60

Hello, I am using shorewall 2.2.3-1 and ipsec-tools-0.5.2 on the same machine. My kernel 2.6.11.10 is patched as needed. The server has an official IP-Adress (no NAT on this side), but some of the clients do use NAT. I figured out that NAT-T connections (RFC 3947) did not work without the "generic:udp:4500" in /etc/shorewall/tunnels: # Road-Warriors ipsecnat net

Lots of updates to the IPSEC documentation on http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.ipsec.html The page lists 4 patches which should be applied to 2.5.47 and 1 patch to be applied to the kame racoon Internet Key Exchange daemon. If these are all applied, everything I throw at it works, modulo some annoying logmessages. Especially new & cool is http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.ipsec.automatic.keying.html

Hi, I have been using IPsec to communicate between a laptop that tracks -stable and a Linksys BEFVP41 router. I only use it infrequently, but it's been working great. My setup is as described in http://grapeape.alerce.com/linksys-ipsec/article.html (which I am planning to submit to the handbook when it's done). I'm no longer able to make an ipsec connection, and I can't put my

What do I have to do to pass ipsec traffic through shorewall? I am not using ipsec to create a tunnel, I am using it in transport mode to encrypt communications between specific hosts on my LAN. when the firewall is clear''d traffic works perfectly and i am able to communicate with the hosts i have setup ipsec on, however when i start shorewall i cannot communicate with those hosts