similar to: 6249405 CIDR support does not work for logical interface

Guys, OK, now that we have the new core contributors squared away, we can go back to finishing the contributors list. There were some people who got added and then there is existing contributors list. I think Darren''s suggestion to wait to add new core contributors is fine (let the new constitution settle down and we can in the meanwhile have a more inclusive look at both rather than

Dear openssh-unix-dev list, in OpenSSH 5.1 you introduced CIDR address/masklen matching for "Match address" blocks in sshd_config as well as supporting CIDR matching in ~/.ssh/authorized_keys from="..." restrictions in sshd. I wonder whether CIDR address/masklen matching will be implemented for permitopen="host:port" restrictions in sshd as well, that would be quite

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3544 Bug ID: 3544 Summary: Support CIDR notation for host pattern matching Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 9.1p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: Miscellaneous Assignee:

First off, I apologize for reporting a problem with a "historical" version of Samba, but this is what we use in our production environment due to some integration issues with the 3.0 series. I've been experiencing a problem with Samba 2.2.x when trying to use a CIDR notation for hosts allow/deny when that CIDR prefix is not one of ( /8, /16, /24, or /32). When I included a

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=597 Summary: ip6tables connlimit - cannot set CIDR greater than 32 (includes fix) Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P1 Component: ip6tables AssignedTo: laforge

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=994 Bug ID: 994 Summary: Named sets with type "ipv4_addr" do not allow adding CIDR elements Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: other Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5

On Wed, 27 Aug 2008, Damien Miller wrote: > On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Peter Stuge wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 11:22:34AM +0200, Bert Courtin wrote: > > > I wonder whether CIDR address/masklen matching will be implemented > > > for permitopen="host:port" restrictions in sshd as well, that would > > > be quite beneficially (at least for me, maybe

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2645 Bug ID: 2645 Summary: allow cidr matching of host in ssh_config Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.3p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: ssh Assignee: unassigned-bugs at

Just updated to 3.0.4 under cygwin and I'm now getting lookup failures in the log. 2008/10/24 00:13:23 [1984] name lookup failed for X.X.X.X: Unknown server error Looking at the code it seems the call will never succeed? /* reverse lookup */ name_err = getnameinfo((struct sockaddr *) ss, ss_len, name_buf, name_buf_size, port_buf, port_buf_size,

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5851 Summary: Name lookup failures and CIDR regression Product: rsync Version: 3.0.4 Platform: All OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy:

Author: kcpoon Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 349b1cb388b086735c29e00e897809db2b8a7417 Log message: 6294727 SCTP raw socket bind() failed for ports which are mutliples of 256 Files: update: usr/src/uts/common/inet/ip/icmp.c update: usr/src/uts/common/inet/ip/ipclassifier.c update: usr/src/uts/common/inet/ipclassifier.h

Author: kcpoon Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 58254c0740547f867826e8149620a26d16242ee7 Log message: 6292054 Zero sctp_rtt_updates should mean no update to IRE RTT cache Files: update: usr/src/uts/common/inet/sctp/sctp_common.c update: usr/src/uts/common/inet/sctp/sctp_impl.h

Author: kcpoon Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 619190e5bf2066eb9762e1f175e75b65165c4a58 Log message: 6292940 sosctp_assoc() should return the reason of error Files: update: usr/src/uts/common/fs/sockfs/socksctp.c update: usr/src/uts/common/fs/sockfs/socksctp.h update: usr/src/uts/common/fs/sockfs/socksctpsubr.c update: usr/src/uts/common/fs/sockfs/socksctpvnops.c

I have a few settings that change based on the network that a system is in, and I have a heterogeneous collection of networks (a few /24s, some /25s, a /29 and a couple /27s, and hey look a /16 in rfc1918 space and...). So I can''t do simple regex matches on dotted-quad IP notation and expect to get a complete story. What I''d like is something like, I dunno... $nameserver =

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=840 Summary: Specifying CIDR when adding to a hash:ip entry is silently ignored Product: ipset Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: default AssignedTo:

I found a command-line program that did this once before, used it for a while and then forgot about it until right now and I'll be damned if I can find it again. A command line IP calculator that takes an address range and give it back in cidr format. I found an online one that does this here: http://www.ipaddresslocation.org/subnet-mask-calculator.php But I would prefer to have the

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1009 Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov (mva) <netfilter at mva.name> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |netfilter at mva.name --- Comment #1 from Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov (mva) <netfilter at

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1513 Summary: CIDR address/masklen matching support for permitopen= Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.1p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org

CentOS-6.10 We have a host with the following ifcfg file contents: BOOTPROTO=none BROADCAST="" DEFROUTE=yes DEVICE=eth1 . . . GATEWAY=X.Y.Z.234 IPADDR=A.B.C.2 IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=yes NAME="LAN Link - eth1" NETMASK="255.255.255.128" NETWORK="A.B.C.0" NM_CONTROLLED=no ONBOOT=yes PREFIX=25 TYPE=Ethernet USERCTL=no And an aliased ifcfg containing this:

In message <ca330312-5343-b7e5-328a-d2b554330081 at thelounge.net>, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: >Am 17.10.2017 um 04:24 schrieb Ronald F. Guilmette via samba: >> Just a trivial question... >> >> Do the hosts allow and hosts deny clauses (i.e. within smb.conf) support >> the use of IPv4 CIDR notation (e.g. A.B.C.D/maskbits) ? >>