similar to: Porting ZFS, trouble with nvpair

Hello ZFS experts: I would like to study ZFS de-duplication feature. Can someone please let me know which directory/files I should be looking at? Thanks in advance. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org

Hello, this is my scenario: 1)I've created a Pacemaker cluster with the following ocfs package on opensuse 11.3 64bit ocfs2console-1.8.0-2.1.x86_64 ocfs2-tools-o2cb-1.8.0-2.1.x86_64 ocfs2-tools-1.8.0-2.1.x86_64 2)I've configured the cluster as usual : <resources> <clone id="dlm-clone"> <meta_attributes id="dlm-clone-meta_attributes">

2. update ZFS in libfsimage from illumos for pygrub diff -r 7c12aaa128e3 -r c2e11847cac0 tools/libfsimage/Rules.mk --- a/tools/libfsimage/Rules.mk Thu Oct 24 22:46:20 2013 +0100 +++ b/tools/libfsimage/Rules.mk Sat Oct 26 20:03:06 2013 +0400 @@ -2,11 +2,19 @@ include $(XEN_ROOT)/tools/Rules.mk CFLAGS += -Wno-unknown-pragmas -I$(XEN_ROOT)/tools/libfsimage/common/

In another thread recursive snapshot creation was found atomic so that it is done quickly, and more important, all at once or nothing at all. Do you know if recursive destroying and renaming of snapshots are atomic too? Regards Henrik Heino

I encountered a strange libzfs behavior while testing a zone fix and want to make sure that I found a genuine bug. I''m creating zones whose zonepaths reside in ZFS datasets (i.e., the parent directories of the zones'' zonepaths are ZFS datasets). In this scenario, zoneadm(1M) attempts to create ZFS datasets for zonepaths. zoneadm(1M) has done this for a long time (since

Hello, I hope this mailing list is correct. I've a cluster pacemaker with a clone resource ocfs2 with ocfs2-tools-1.4.1-25.6.x86_64 ocfs2-tools-o2cb-1.4.1-25.6.x86_64 on Opensuse 11.2 After some network problem on my switch I receive on one of 4 nodes of my cluster the following messages Aug 18 13:12:28 nodo1 openais[8462]: [TOTEM] The token was lost in the OPERATIONAL state. Aug 18 13:12:28

Hi, There seems to be a few threads about zpool hang, do we have a workaround to resolve the hang issue without rebooting ? In my case, I have a pool with disks from external LUNs via a fiber cable. When the cable is unplugged while there is IO in the pool, All zpool related command hang (zpool status, zpool list, etc.), put the cable back does not solve the problem. Eventually, I

Banging my head against a Seagate 3TB USB3 drive. Its marketing name is: Seagate Expansion 3 TB USB 3.0 Desktop External Hard Drive STAY3000102 format(1M) shows it identify itself as: Seagate-External-SG11-2.73TB Under both Solaris 10 and Solaris 11x, I receive the evil message: | I/O request is not aligned with 4096 disk sector size. | It is handled through Read Modify Write but the performance

I''m pretty sure this is my fault but I need some help in fixing the system. It was installed at one point with snv_29 with the pre integration SUNWzfs package. I did a live upgrade to snv_42 but forgot to remove the old SUNWzfs before I did so. When the system booted up got complaints about kstat install because I still had an old zpool kernel module lying around. So I did pkgrm

(i use the term loosely because i know that zfs likes whole volumes better) when installing ubuntu, i got in the habit of using a separate partition for my home directory so that my data and gnome settings would all remain intact when i reinstalled or upgraded. i''m running osol 2008.11 on an ultra 20, which has only two drives. i''ve got all my data located in my home directory,

Hello, 9-STABLE fails to build with clang and *without* "NO_WERROR=" and "WERROR=" in /etc/make.conf. It used to work not long before : FreeBSD zozo.afpicl.lan 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #0 r237222M: Mon Jun 18 10:18:54 CEST 2012 root@zozo.afpicl.lan:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CORE amd64 # svnversion 238067M # make NOCLEAN=yes NO_CLEAN=yes buildworld [...] ===> cddl/lib

Hello zfs-code, http://cvs.opensolaris.org/source/xref/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/uts/common/fs/zfs/vdev_cache.c 72 * All i/os smaller than zfs_vdev_cache_max will be turned into 73 * 1<<zfs_vdev_cache_bshift byte reads by the vdev_cache (aka software 74 * track buffer). At most zfs_vdev_cache_size bytes will be kept in each 75 * vdev''s vdev_cache. While it

I have an Ultra 10 client running Sol10 U3 that has a zfs pool set up on the extra space of the internal ide disk. There''s just the one fs and it is shared with the sharenfs property. When this system reboots nfs/server ends up getting disabled and this is the error from the SMF logs: [ Apr 16 08:41:22 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/nfs-server start") ] [ Apr 16

Hi all, Is there some documentation or some example on how to interpret the arg0 .. arg<n> for the aioread, aiowrite, aiowait syscalls? The system call name for all three seems to be "kaio". Michael === Michael Mueller ================== Tel. + 49 8171 63600 Fax. + 49 8171 63615 Web: http://www.michael-mueller-it.de ======================================

Hello. I have a Solaris 11/11 x86 box (which I migrated from SolEx 11/10 a couple of weeks ago). Without no obvious reason (at least for me), after an uptime of 1 to 2 days (observed 3 times now) Solaris sets arc_no_grow to 1 and then never sets it back to 0. ARC is being shrunk to less than 1 GB -- needless to say that performance is terrible. There is not much load on this system. Memory

I''m working on a case where customer has a 3rd party streams driver/module, called uplink, which sits over Sun''s ce driver. This 3rd party module is used by the telco to perform telco grade NIC failover. The customer was given an IDR ce driver, to avoid a panic they were given. The IDR driver was successful in avoiding the panic, but now the customer is getting many

Hello List due to a mistake my post from yesterday has been cut. This is why I try to send my post again and open it as new thread. I hope it will work this time. <---- Original postet mail starts here ----> Hello Marcel, hello Samuel, sorry for my late answer, but I was away for two months and for that I could continue my tests last week. First of all thank you for your patch of the

Does opensolaris iSCSI target support SCSI-3 PGR reservation ? My goal is to use the iSCSI LUN created by [1] or [2] as a quorum device for a 3-node suncluster. [1] zfs set shareiscsi=on <storage-pool/zfs volume name> [2] iscsitadm create target ..... Thanks, -- leon This message posted from opensolaris.org

Has anyone else noticed a significant zfs performance deterioration when running recent opensolaris bits? My 32-bit / 768 MB Toshiba Tecra S1 notebook was able to do a full opensolaris release build in ~ 4 hours 45 minutes (gcc shadow compilation disabled; using an lzjb compressed zpool / zfs on a single notebook hdd p-ata drive). After upgrading to 2007-05-25 opensolaris release bits

Summary: If you use ZFS, do not downgrade from build 35 or later to build 34 or earlier. This putback (into Solaris Nevada build 35) introduced a backwards- compatable change to the ZFS on-disk format. Old pools will be seamlessly accessed by the new code; you do not need to do anything special. However, do *not* downgrade from build 35 or later to build 34 or earlier. If you do so, some of