similar to: [Bug 3544] New: Support CIDR notation for host pattern matching

Dear openssh-unix-dev list, in OpenSSH 5.1 you introduced CIDR address/masklen matching for "Match address" blocks in sshd_config as well as supporting CIDR matching in ~/.ssh/authorized_keys from="..." restrictions in sshd. I wonder whether CIDR address/masklen matching will be implemented for permitopen="host:port" restrictions in sshd as well, that would be quite

I have a few settings that change based on the network that a system is in, and I have a heterogeneous collection of networks (a few /24s, some /25s, a /29 and a couple /27s, and hey look a /16 in rfc1918 space and...). So I can''t do simple regex matches on dotted-quad IP notation and expect to get a complete story. What I''d like is something like, I dunno... $nameserver =

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1009 Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov (mva) <netfilter at mva.name> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |netfilter at mva.name --- Comment #1 from Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov (mva) <netfilter at

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1513 Summary: CIDR address/masklen matching support for permitopen= Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.1p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5851 Summary: Name lookup failures and CIDR regression Product: rsync Version: 3.0.4 Platform: All OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy:

Just a trivial question... Do the hosts allow and hosts deny clauses (i.e. within smb.conf) support the use of IPv4 CIDR notation (e.g. A.B.C.D/maskbits) ? The specific documentation page I was looking at, i.e.: https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/using_samba/ch06.html was rather entirely ambiguous on this one small point. When describing the interfaces clause, it says explicitly that CIDRs

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=840 Summary: Specifying CIDR when adding to a hash:ip entry is silently ignored Product: ipset Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: default AssignedTo:

I found a command-line program that did this once before, used it for a while and then forgot about it until right now and I'll be damned if I can find it again. A command line IP calculator that takes an address range and give it back in cidr format. I found an online one that does this here: http://www.ipaddresslocation.org/subnet-mask-calculator.php But I would prefer to have the

In message <ca330312-5343-b7e5-328a-d2b554330081 at thelounge.net>, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: >Am 17.10.2017 um 04:24 schrieb Ronald F. Guilmette via samba: >> Just a trivial question... >> >> Do the hosts allow and hosts deny clauses (i.e. within smb.conf) support >> the use of IPv4 CIDR notation (e.g. A.B.C.D/maskbits) ? >>

On Wed, 27 Aug 2008, Damien Miller wrote: > On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Peter Stuge wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 11:22:34AM +0200, Bert Courtin wrote: > > > I wonder whether CIDR address/masklen matching will be implemented > > > for permitopen="host:port" restrictions in sshd as well, that would > > > be quite beneficially (at least for me, maybe

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2645 Bug ID: 2645 Summary: allow cidr matching of host in ssh_config Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.3p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: ssh Assignee: unassigned-bugs at

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1009 Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo at netfilter.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo at netfilter.org> --- There are already kernel

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1009 Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo at netfilter.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |admin at rollinix.net --- Comment #3 from Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo at netfilter.org> --- *** Bug 994

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1009 Tom Hughes <tom at compton.nu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tom at compton.nu -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. -------------- next part

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1009 Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo at netfilter.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #4 from Pablo Neira Ayuso

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1009 Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo at netfilter.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jason.lee.campbell at gmail.co | |m --- Comment #5 from

First off, I apologize for reporting a problem with a "historical" version of Samba, but this is what we use in our production environment due to some integration issues with the 3.0 series. I've been experiencing a problem with Samba 2.2.x when trying to use a CIDR notation for hosts allow/deny when that CIDR prefix is not one of ( /8, /16, /24, or /32). When I included a

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=597 Summary: ip6tables connlimit - cannot set CIDR greater than 32 (includes fix) Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P1 Component: ip6tables AssignedTo: laforge

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=994 Bug ID: 994 Summary: Named sets with type "ipv4_addr" do not allow adding CIDR elements Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: other Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5

Just updated to 3.0.4 under cygwin and I'm now getting lookup failures in the log. 2008/10/24 00:13:23 [1984] name lookup failed for X.X.X.X: Unknown server error Looking at the code it seems the call will never succeed? /* reverse lookup */ name_err = getnameinfo((struct sockaddr *) ss, ss_len, name_buf, name_buf_size, port_buf, port_buf_size,