similar to: xenbr0 vs. virtbr0

Somehow I managed to disable the creation of xenbr0 on boot-up of the host system. CentOS 5 with standard CentOS Xen. I changed all Xen VMs to use xenbr0 instead of virbr0 and disabled virtlibd. Works fine. But when I later restarted the machine I found that all networking for guests had gone. On inspection there's no xenbr0 created anymore. I can get it up by stopping network (or eth0)

I created my first Xen VM that didn't use a static IP address. It grabs an IP from the 198.168.122.0 subnet (from I don't know where). I would rather want it to use my DHCP server. How can I achieve this? Kai -- Kai Sch?tzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com

Hi! I want to forward the port 3389 from the domU to the virtual server with ip address 192.168.122.77 with not success... I tried a lot of iptables rules with no luck so far. Is this possible? I take a look at other post and I don''t found an answer. By example: /sbin/iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -i xenbr0 --dport 3389 -j DNAT --to 192.168.122.77:3389 the virtual nic for the

Hi all, my dom0 is centos5.2 and domU paravirtualized is centos5.1 I can play sound on dom0 but not in domU (name: gasphar), moreover I use wifi as my inet connection and on installing domU cento5.1, I used virt-manager. I know that libvirtd made virbr0 and when changing to xenbr0, I cannot connect to internet but ssh to dom0 is fine! so how do I enable sound device on domU and changing to

I am fairly new to xen and am trying to build a new guest using virt-manager. When I get to the screen where you can choose virtual or shared physical device there are no physical devices to choose from. Is there some step that I have missed while setting up my Dom0? -Joel Coopersmith Sr. Systems and Networking Analyst joel.coopersmith@accenture.com

Hey, I was originally asking questions on xen-users but no one seems to have any idea about this so I figured I''d try this list. I compiled Xen from source (3.2 testing) on an Intel machine running Fedora Core 8 and have discovered that my guest (Windows Vista) does not have a network connection. Looking at various online documentation and a machine that does work, I guessed that I

I''m using xen-3.0.3-64.el5_2.1 on centos 5.2. When I installed centos 5.2 at first time, I could see shared physical device (xenbr0). but after updating virtualization package by yum, it disappeared... connection.py is patched at centos 5.2 release time. so I can''t find out what''s wrong.... bridge configuration is below and it''s normal state.

Hi Every one, I'm hoping some one can point me in the right direction. We are piloting KVM + Libvirt for migrating off Xen and I'm stuck with the network bridge configuration via libvirt. What we have currently with xen is: 1 server with Wan/lan interfaces and a pool of public ip addresses. Using xen bridge scripts I'd start a xenbr0 and attach eth0 (wan) and go ahead and assign

I've got a Centos guest and a Windows 2003 server guest running in Xen under Centos (5.2 in both cases), and they can get out to the network, and I can ping them from dom0. This is my first Xen install, and I haven't used Linux as a router before (I'm very familiar with it as a webserver and development platform) so I'm a bit weak on the bridging code and NAT / IP masquerading.

Hi, I ''ve got a CentOS 5.2 server running xen 3.0 with 2 DomUs also running CentOS 5.2. All my boxes are up-to date. I''m experiencing trouble with networking. Dom0 can reach the outside world when no DomU are started. It can also reach the outside world when only one DomU is running. The troubles begin when I start the second DomU. At first, this new DomU, called DomU2,

Hi, I tried this post on the Xen list first with no answer. I have 4 machines and 3 of which (all different) have no network access when booted into Xen. I tried using Fedora Core 8 and it produced the same results. Is it normal for the virbr0 interface to take an arbitrary IP? How does it decide what to use? An ifconfig when booted into Xen shows the following: eth0 Link encap:Ethernet

Hi ! I have install the xen4+centos5 on my server following the post of the kernel version is 2.6.32.27 which is download from git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git But after I reboot the server ,and run the "ifconfig", whose output likes the following [root@localhost scripts]# ifconfig eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:15:C5:EB:96:C3

Already reported.... http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2516 >Subject: RE: [CentOS-virt] xenbr0 isn't created anymore >To: <centos-virt at centos.org> >Message-ID: > <E2BB8074E5500C42984D980D4BD78EF9022A704E at MFG-NYC-EXCH2.mfg.prv> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > >Kai Schaetzl wrote: >> >> Somehow I managed

Hi, I have Xen 3.0.3 installed on CentOS 5.5 with 2 paravirtualized domU''s configured to use the default bridge networking and am having networking issues. If I boot the computer fresh I am able to ping dom0 and can SSH into it and start the domU''s. The following ping snippet demonstrates the problem. The first group of "Destination Host Unreachable" is while the

I want to add the following route command route add -net 192.168.2.0/27 gw 192.168.2.3 via the normal network setup. The result should be the following routing table (the first line): 192.168.2.0/27 via 192.168.2.3 dev xenbr1 scope link 192.168.2.0/27 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.2.4 192.168.2.0/27 dev xenbr1 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.2.3 192.168.1.0/24 dev xenbr0

Hi , I have two virtual machines VM1 and VM2. Then I have added eth0 of my VM to 'default' network. Use case :- I want to monitor all traffic on virbr0('default' network). Steps followed :- 1. Add VM1 eth0 to virbr0 2. Add VM2 eth1 to virbr0 3. brctl setageing ovsbr0 0 ..(To put bridge in promiscuous) Now I am running tcpdump on eth1 of VM2 and trying to ping

Has anyone ran into this issue before? 2 physical nics: eth0 hooked up to 10.175.8.0/21 eth1 hooked up to 10.150.8.0/24 Ifconfig -a looks like this: [root@mgixen1 ~]# ifconfig -a eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:19:B9:F2:1B:C3 inet addr:10.175.8.158 Bcast:10.175.15.255 Mask:255.255.248.0 inet6 addr: fe80::219:b9ff:fef2:1bc3/64 Scope:Link UP

At work I have a script that provisions a vm for use by employees. One step in this process is to fetch hadoop, which we happen to get from cloudera. I noticed the script always failed when I used libvirt's default networking (nat) but worked fine when I used user mode networking. My instinct is that this is related to (potentially uncommon) network traffic from the server in question, and

On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 10:05:19AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote: >On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 02:26:59AM -0400, Travis S. Johnson wrote: >>Hello, >> >>I came across an interesting problem in my home lab a few weeks ago as I'm >>prepping for my RHCE exam using Michael Jang study guide. I've been at this >>for days now, and I still can't wrap my head around

Hello, I came across an interesting problem in my home lab a few weeks ago as I'm prepping for my RHCE exam using Michael Jang study guide. I've been at this for days now, and I still can't wrap my head around how two or more virtual networks in default NAT configuration are even allowed to communicate with each other despite what the libvirt documentation said. Here's the