similar to: Hanging, uninterruptible smbd-process in "D"-state

Hi, tanks for the answer. Since /proc/<PID>/stack is a stack the topmost element should be the task where it got stuck which is: rwsem_down_write_slowpath which waits for getting a write lock semaphore: cat /proc/10193/stack [<0>] rwsem_down_write_slowpath+0x2e2/0x620 [<0>] nfs_rmdir+0x117/0x1b0 [nfs] [<0>] vfs_rmdir+0x7c/0x1b0 [<0>] do_rmdir+0x216/0x230

Hello Luc, thanks for your answer. If I understand you correctly than you are using samba4 as windows domaincontroller and you do not have another Windows DC? So after all you have exactly one Kerberos Server that is part of the samba4 server? Thanks Rainer Am 24.03.2015 um 12:41 schrieb Luc Lalonde: > Guten tag Rainer, > > We use our Samba4/Win2k8 AD domain to authenticate all our

Hello, since a while I experience a strange problem with my samba 4.4.2 running on a SLES12SP2 system. The server does what it is supposed to do, so users can work without any problems and access their files via smb but since some weeks the server shows a strange and unusual very high system load. The samba server is not the domaincrontroller (which is a windows machine) but member of the

Hello, I am running a samba server on a SLES12SP3 machine smb version 4.6.9+git.59.c2cff9cea4c. The samba server offers only the smb service, the file data are stored on separate NFS servers because files are accesses by our users from either linux or windows systems. So a write to this samba server always will read or write files from/to NFS servers. The problem is speed when many very small

Hello, I am searching for a solution that I thought should be kind of standard, but until now I was not successful finding anything. Here is the problem: At our site we offer windows and linux, most servers (eg file, samba, web) are linux based. User data is stored on NFS file servers. Windows systems are part of a Windows domain with an ADS domain controller. At the moment the linux samba

Am 02.10.2017 um 16:41 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Mon, 2 Oct 2017 14:51:54 +0200 > Rainer Krienke via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hello, >> .... >> [2017/10/02 11:07:47.046715, 2] >> ../source3/auth/auth.c:315(auth_check_ntlm_password) >> check_ntlm_password: Authentication for user [HOSTNAME$] -> >> [HOSTNAME$]

Hallo, thank you very much for your link. Unfortunately I cannot make all files of all our users upper case. This is because all files that are stored on our fileservers for all our about 12000 accounts can be accessed via Samba but also via NFS from linux. Moreover even Users that usually work with Windows, sometimes log in on a Linux machine and want to access their files as well. What I am

Hello, we recently had a big problem with a very high load on our linux (Sles11 SP3) samba server version 3.6.3. We experienced a system load of up to 90 for 300 active samba users. The result was that hardly any user was able to really do anything (eg access a file via samba). One sympton was visible in a very high share of cpu *system* time (about 25% on each of the 10 CPUs). This system load

Hello, I try to set up a clustered samba server (on Novell SLES11SP2) based upon CTDB and NFS. My problem is that I do not yet understand the structure of the setup when using NFS. I followed the documentation in http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/CTDB_Setup#Setting_up_CTDB_for_clustered_NFS As far as I understand this documentation, it should be possible to set up a samba cluster say having 3

Guten tag Rainer, We use our Samba4/Win2k8 AD domain to authenticate all our Linux/Windows/OSX workstations. The home directories are mounted using CIFS in the Windows and OSX clients and NFS4 (krb5) in our Linux labs. Here?s our documentation (french): https://techwiki.gi.polymtl.ca/NFSv4_Kerberos <https://techwiki.gi.polymtl.ca/NFSv4_Kerberos> If Google translate gives you something

Hello Micha, we are using the sgid bit (chmod g+s <basedir>) in the base directory to inherit the group of this base-directotry to all new directories/files in it. In the smb share using this base directory you still have to set "inherit permissions=yes" which takes care of inheriting the sgid bit to new sub directories. This way all directories/files have the same group. This

Hello, I recently set up a samba cluster with 4 nodes using ctdb. The systems are virtual Citrix xen machines running SuSE SLES11Sp2 with samba 3.6.3. The shared filesystem needed for ctdb is on a ocfs2 share stored on a ISCSI target. The cluster is running fine and ip takeover etc is working fine as well. To find out how the cluster would performe in real life with many clients accessing

I am driving a Suse 8.2 linux with cups 1.1.18 and samba 2.2.7a. The problem: The host serves several printers via cups. If some jobs are in one of the queues "lpq -Pprinter" or "lpstat -o printer" shows up the complete listing. Fine. Connected to the same print queue from a Windows (XP/NT/98/2k) box I cannot see the complete listing. Sometimes I see some of the jobs, most of

I tried this. When im creating a folder directly on server, the sticky bit is working. But it does not work when im doing it from windows. # ls -l drwxrws---+ 7 root stickygroup 4096 Mär 5 14:44 00_stickygroup/ Best regards Micha Am 05.03.2018 um 14:15 schrieb Michael Wandel: > IMHO you can use the posix sgid bit.

On Mon, 2 Oct 2017 14:51:54 +0200 Rainer Krienke via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello, > .... > [2017/10/02 11:07:47.046715, 2] > ../source3/auth/auth.c:315(auth_check_ntlm_password) > check_ntlm_password: Authentication for user [HOSTNAME$] -> > [HOSTNAME$] FAILED with error NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER > It looks fairly obvious to me, the Samba

Dear samba admins, I have a samba/cups related problem. I am running SuSE 10.1 with cups 1.1.23 and samba 3.0.22. The problem is, that my windows printer status boxes don't reflect the samba printer queues. My test scenario: - I use "printing = SYSV" because I need to use "print command", too. - I installed a new printer named "test", called cupsaddsmb test. -

Hi I logged in to one of my servers today and noticed that the load average is very high. After investigating the problem I found two processes in "D" stat ("uninterruptible sleep"): root 24344 0.0 0.2 1532 584 ? DN Jul21 0:01 /usr/bin/updatedb -f NFS,SMBFS,NCPFS,PROC,DEVPTS -e /tmp,/var/tmp,/usr/tmp,/afs,/net root 25899 0.0 0.2 1532 584 ? DN

Hi, I've encountered a strange issue, difficult to reproduce for now. I'm searching from where it comes. Here are some facts: - all programs are compiled from sources using gcc 2.95.3/glibc2.2.x and run on a i686 LFS linux system. - rsync doesn't run above ssl. - using rsync 2.5.4 as server to backup mailboxes on another computer. rsync daemon is launched from xinetd, rsync

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen! On a CD-ROM-server at the University Koblenz-Landau we are using Samba (2.0.5a) with Red Hat Linux (6.0, Kernel 2.2.5). The server is located here in Koblenz, but also used from another department of the university at Landau (about 80 miles from Koblenz; they have their own class B network). A traceroute from both locations gave a response time of about 10-50 msec. On

Did you run any of the dbchecks? https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Updating_Samba On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Donaldson Jeff < Jeff.Donaldson at ncs.k12.de.us> wrote: > Greetings, > > > I recently upgraded Samba on an Ubuntu 14.04.2 server from version 4.1.9 > to 4.2.3. Upon rebooting Samba process goes into a running state then after > a short time it will go into