similar to: Mongrel 0.3.13.4 Pre-Release -- PID Files Wor king

Hi Folks, An update to tell everyone to try out the pre-release again: sudo gem install mongrel --source=http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/releases/ Nothing available for win32 yet, the next pre-release will have a win32 build to check that windows folks are OK. This release fixes the following problems: * PID files weren''t being written when configured. Works now and logs messages

Alright, this time a small announce going out to *just* the mongrel list so I can get some early testing. There''s a new pre-release of 0.3.13.4 out that includes the win32 version of the gem. ** WIN32 USERS SHOULD INSTALL THIS AND TEST.*** ***** BUT NOT ON PRODUCTION SYSTEMS. ****** As usual, you install it with: sudo gem install mongrel --source=http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/releases/

Hey Win32 folks, I messed up the win32 gem for my last Pre-Release announce. Please grab it again with: gem install mongrel --source=http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/releases/ And make sure your apps work with it. Nothing else has changed, but there will be another release for win32 tomorrow. -- Zed A. Shaw http://www.zedshaw.com/ http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/ http://www.railsmachine.com/

It''s gotta be Rascal. There''s no fixing Victoria - that''s a re-write from the ground up. And Jake a recipe for disaster; Class Jake < Bat include Pig attr_accessor :one_eye . . end That pig ''ll never fly. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: mongrel-users-request at rubyforge.org < mongrel-users-request at rubyforge.org> Date:

Hi folks, I just put a pre-release of Mongrel up for people to try. You can install it with: gem install mongrel --source=http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/releases/ And try out your application and confirm the stuff works. USE RFUZZ AND RUBY If you find a bug, I''d appreciate it if you can go grab RFuzz (or use net/http) and work up a little bit of Ruby that demonstrates the bug. If

Calling All Mongrel Minions! I wanna have some fun and would like this as a Christmas present. The site http://www.workingwithrails.com/ has this lame popularity system that''s kind of irking some of the main Ruby contributors. I think it''s kind of funny, but would like to demonstrate what an army of motivated people can do to these kinds of popularity contests. So, as a

Hi Zed/Jonathan, VMWare Server is free now. http://www.vmware.com/products/server/ http://www.vmware.com/pdf/server_datasheet.pdf www.vmware.com/download/server Runs on any standard x86 hardware * Supports 64-bit guest operating systems, including Windows, Linux, and Solaris * Support for VMware VirtualCenter to efficiently manage infrastructure from a central management console *

Hello Everyone, This is a short announce to get people to try the 0.3.13.4 pre-release with their applications. This release features a few things that folks have asked for, and a backport of an enhancement from the 0.4 release coming later. The features are: 1) A new --prefix command line option for people who want to mount their rails app at a different base URI. Thanks to Scott for the

Hey Folks, There''s a nasty little bug in 0.3.13.3 when running in development mode which could cause all sorts of problems. Please grab the pre-release of 0.3.13.4 and tell me if it works for you: gem install mongrel --source=http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/releases/ Thanks! -- Zed A. Shaw http://www.zedshaw.com/ http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/ http://www.railsmachine.com/ -- Need

Hi Kevin/All, I''m a rails/ruby noob. Have put a rails app in production on Windows :-) We have put our java apps in production using SUSE. If you can throw some light On "SUSE is gorgeous but slow" -- it will help us. Is only ruby/rails slow on Suse OR is it considered to be generally slow distro for all apps ? If slow for most apps, how much Performance hit is that ?

Try adding a star at the end. eg : /home/bob/.mozilla/firefox/* If this is still not excluding as you expect then please let me know. On 16/04/2009, at 8:19 AM, Robert Parker wrote: > Reading and re-reading the man page has got me nowhere with this issue > and searching your site on '--exclude-from' got me to the same place. > > Here is the script I am using: >

Yo Zed, Just curious -- what do you think of the LiteSpeed server? Is it better than Lighty? Does it (gasp!) also serve Rails apps like Mongrel? I think I read that LiteSpeed doesn''t have proxying support. Thanks, Joe __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

>> Can I change my vote to http://samugliestdog.com/Sam162edited.jpg yikes! how''d that get past my firewall? +1 On 6/30/06, mongrel-users-request at rubyforge.org <mongrel-users-request at rubyforge.org> wrote: > Send Mongrel-users mailing list submissions to > mongrel-users at rubyforge.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit

Hey Folks, I''ve been rather absent lately, but I now have this week slated for full-time Mongrel development. The goal is to get a few big fixes into 0.3.13.4 and release that, and then get a pre-release of 0.4 out for folks to test against. Please make sure you put any outstanding bugs into: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?atid=5145&group_id=1306&func=browse And any feature

Hi Everyone, Just a friendly reminder that if you hit something you think is a bug, please use the bug tracker for it. http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?group_id=1306&atid=5145 I have a hard time wading through the Forums, mailing list, and my personal e-mail box pulling out the bugs I need to fix. I just finished doing it for this last round and there was about 7 bugs and 5 feature

Hello Everyone, I just posted another pre-release of Mongrel that fixes a bug which caused Mongrel to claim it was getting parsing errors because the QUERY_STRINGs were too long. In actuality it was shift in the parser that made empty queries (/test?) become negative. This is fixed up now. Here''s the full list of changes: * It has a couple of fixes for win32, but I still have to

Howdy Folks, This release is after painstaking analysis of a memory leak that was reported by Bradley Taylor, reduced by myself, and then fixed after much work. You should all thank Bradley for finding the bizarre fix. It turns out the Ruby has a memory leak when you use pretty much any thread locking primitive other than Sync (Mutex, Monitor, etc.): http://pastie.caboo.se/10194 The fix (for

Mike, I got it working!! Have a look at what I have, here is my smb.conf and my pam.conf. # Global parameters [global] workgroup = RRLNTD01 server string = SUN001 security = DOMAIN password server = nts009 log level = 10 syslog = 7 log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 50 name resolve order = wins lmhosts bcast

Hello, I''ve been developing an application (on Windows), and everything was going pretty well, but I suddenly began getting this weird error back from Webrick after submitting something through ajax, and only through ajax. I''m submitting a form through ajax, and it is being process properly - with all the interaction with the database happening without problem. The response

Zed: 1) Error: test_more_web_server(HandlersTest): EOFError: end of file reached I solved this changing the following lines in test_handlers.rb:75-76 res = hit([ "http://127.0.0.1:9998/", "http://127.0.0.1:9998/test", I cannot solve the other failures: 1) Failure: test_header_is_too_long(WebServerTest) [./test/test_ws.rb:93:in