similar to: Samba-tool Error creating new GPO

I have a domain that I upgraded from a Samba 3/LDAP set up about a year ago. I haven't done anything too interesting with it and it's generally been working OK. I attempted to create a new GPO for my domain. From a Win 7 client I get an error "This security ID may not be assigned as the owner of this object". Thinking this was an issue with sysvol acls, I ran "samba-tool

Hi together, did nobody before joined a Windows Functional Level 2016 Domain with Samba 4.19? Am 10/25/23 um 13:58 schrieb matti.kaupenjohann via samba: > So. I've builded 4.19.2 from source. building worked fine and I've > configured like the following: > > ./configure \ > ?? ?--sbindir=/usr/local/sbin \ > ?? ?--bindir=/usr/local/bin \ > ??

So. I've builded 4.19.2 from source. building worked fine and I've configured like the following: ./configure \ ?? ?--sbindir=/usr/local/sbin \ ?? ?--bindir=/usr/local/bin \ ?? ?--sysconfdir=/etc/samba \ ?? ?--mandir=/usr/share/man \ ?? ?--systemd-install-services \ ?? ?--with-systemddir=/lib/systemd/system \ ?? ?--enable-selftest \ ?? ?--disable-cups I ran make quicktest with

Dear all. I currently have a Centos7 box running Samba 4.6.5. I would like to increase functional level to latest one. For this reason I created another box (Ubuntu 22.04) with 4.18.9. The plan was to define Ubuntu box as an additional AD server. Once have replica of the AD, move FSMO from Centos to Ubuntu, demote the Centos server and finally increase functional level. On Ubuntu, checked

Hi ! I am trying to use rsync to copy ACL between two Windows hosts. First, I try locally on a Windows hosting an AD. If I use rsync 3, I get this (I get the same thing with latest snapshot): -bash-3.2$ ./rsync-HEAD-20070703-1547GMT/rsync.exe -aAv copieA/ copieB sending incremental file list recv_acl_access: value out of range: ff rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at

Hello rsync users, I'm trying to copy every file which belongs to my Ubuntu 23.04 installation (stored on an ext4 fs to a ZFS storage disk. The command that I've used is : # rsync -avxHAX * /mnt/zroot2/zroot2/OS/Linux/EVO sending incremental file list rsync: [generator] set_acl: sys_acl_set_file(dev/kvm, ACL_TYPE_ACCESS): Operation not supported (95) rsync: [generator] set_acl:

Dear R users, Suppose I have 2 R script files: 'test1.R' and 'test2.R' and one R file 'main.R' which sources each of them. I wonder if there is a way to skip rest of code in 'test1.R' once a condition is met but still continue to run rest of script from the 'main'R' file. A simple example is shown below. I hope only 'message1' and

I've seen alot of posts lately on Queue and Agent functionality, and alot of hacks to make them do different things that most call center managers want. In the sake of doing this one time, I'd like to develop a single list of request so we can consolidate a feature request for the Queue/Agent system. Here are the ones that I run into the most: 1. Queue should know the status of agents

Hello, I got many errors on files when synchronizing the sysvol directory between 2 AD DC with osync : ... rsync: set_acl: sys_acl_set_file(ariane.intra/Policies/{2487894F-DA69-4CE1-82A9-D9B4EFE5D32E}/Adm, ACL_TYPE_ACCESS): Invalid argument (22) rsync: set_acl: sys_acl_set_file(ariane.intra/Policies/{2487894F-DA69-4CE1-82A9-D9B4EFE5D32E}/Adm/admfiles.ini, ACL_TYPE_ACCESS): Invalid argument

I apologize in advance for asking a beginner question, but I really could not figure this from the manual page. I want to copy some files with rsync, and not copy others. The stuff that I do not want to copy looks like this: System Volume Information/_restore*/RP* WINDOWS/Prefetch/* Documents and Settings/leila/Local Settings/Application Data/Google/Chrome/Application/*/Installer/chrome.7z

I am using rsync 3.0.3 to copy a remote RAID volume on one Xserve to the local RAID volume on an other Xserve. Both Xserves are running OS X Server 10.4.11. I have compiled rsync 3.0.3 on both machines and patched it following Mike Bombich's instructions at http://www.bombich.com/mactips/rsync.html After some struggles, and with invaluable help from the list, I how have an rsync script running

Check that ACL's are enabled on the destination volume. Details on how to do this are available from the following URL : http://connect.homeunix.com/lbackup/doku.php?id=access_control_lists Hope this helps. > I am using rsync 3.0.3 to copy a remote RAID volume on one Xserve to > the > local RAID volume on an other Xserve. Both Xserves are running OS X > Server > 10.4.11.

>-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: rowlandpenny at googlemail.com >[mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Rowland Penny >Verzonden: vrijdag 24 april 2015 11:06 >Aan: samba at lists.samba.org >Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Strange GPO rights samba 4.2.1 > >On 24/04/15 09:52, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: >> Hai, >> >> Im having a strange thing with

Greetings! During migrating i686 installation of ArchLinux to x86_64, all filesystem was rsynced to a new location. Maybe this somehow relates to the problem that has appeared after migrating and that did not happen before: during backuping the system, rsync reports the following error message: rsync: set_acl: sys_acl_delete_def_file(var/log/journal/remote): Operation not supported (95) The

When using the following to keep duplicate files on multiple computers, I find some files have their ACLs changed and cannot then be opened. I am using the following command. My goal is to be able to read/write/edit any local or remote file from any machine. Until recently this worked just fine, but now some files cannot be opened once rsync'd. rsync -avzh --progress --delete --super -A

If the filesystem doesn't support ACLs then don't use -A. Also, why is there samba between rsync and btrfs? On 06/23/2016 04:14 PM, Albert Berger wrote: > Greetings! > > During migrating i686 installation of ArchLinux to x86_64, all filesystem was rsynced to a new location. Maybe this somehow relates to the problem that has appeared after migrating and that did not happen

Hi Yassine, Thanks for the effort, unfortunately, we cannot turn it into an actual mailbox, this is a long story that I don't want to include here. but it would not be a valid option in our environment. Any other ideas Is it possible to do it with vacation? Is there another auto responder or plugin that can achieve this? How do ticketing systems handle this? Thanks Monis On Sun, Mar 10,

First off, the website documentation is really good for Dovecot but while reading I was not able to find anything pertaining to inbox hashing for Maildirs. I saw plenty about hashing the directories that the user mailboxes live in but nothing about specifically hashing an individual user's inbox directory itself. Is there any method for hashing the inbox automatically after say 5,000

Since sending to the alias will send to a, b and c, just define the filter on one mailbox only instead of making it global I guess. Yassine. On 3/10/19 11:51 AM, Yassine Chaouche via dovecot wrote: > > I am curious to know how did you define the filter on an alias in the > first place ? is it a filter defined globaly in dovecot ? I don't see > how it can be defined in any

On 3/10/19 9:07 AM, Yassine Chaouche via dovecot wrote: > > On 3/9/19 12:41 PM, Monis Monther via dovecot wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> We have an alias group named xyz at example.com >> <mailto:xyz at example.com>, this alias group has 3 actual users >> a at example.com <mailto:a at example.com>, b at example.com >> <mailto:b at