similar to: Issues demoting a samba DC.

On 08/01/2023 11:04, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote: > Hello! > > I'm trying to remove a DC from our samba domain (samba 4.17.4). > It was the primary controller (with FSMO roles), - I successfully > transferred the roles to another DC.? Now it's time to demote: > > ai# samba-tool domain demote -U mjt-adm > Using svdcp.tls.msk.ru as partner server for the

08.01.2023 14:21, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: .. >> ai# samba-tool domain demote -U mjt-adm .. >> ERROR(ldb): Error while renaming CN=AI,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=tls,DC=msk,DC=ru to CN=AI,CN=Computers,DC=tls,DC=msk,DC=ru - LDAP error 50 >> LDAP_INSUFFICIENT_ACCESS_RIGHTS -? <acl:access_denied renaming CN=AI,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=tls,DC=msk,DC=ru> <> .. > If

On 08/01/2023 14:19, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote: > 08.01.2023 14:21, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > .. >>> ai# samba-tool domain demote -U mjt-adm > .. >>> ERROR(ldb): Error while renaming CN=AI,OU=Domain >>> Controllers,DC=tls,DC=msk,DC=ru to >>> CN=AI,CN=Computers,DC=tls,DC=msk,DC=ru - LDAP error 50 >>>

08.01.2023 18:54, Michael Tokarev wrote: ... > And nope, after removing this stale A gc._msdcs record from samba DNS, it > still does not work and still logs the same error message, apparenlty when > trying to log in to the other DC for replication: > > [2023/01/08 18:50:43.390974,? 0] ../../source4/librpc/rpc/dcerpc_util.c:681(dcerpc_pipe_auth_recv) > ? Failed to bind to uuid

08.07.2024 17:18, Sonic wrote: > On Mon, Jul 8, 2024 at 6:46?AM Michael Tokarev <mjt at tls.msk.ru> wrote: > ... >> I think the main ingredient here is to have apt-listchanges package >> installed (which, while part of standard install, is optional). > ... > > I've always installed using the netinstall.iso which does not install > that package. Will add it

On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 15:19:35 +0300 Michael Tokarev <mjt at tls.msk.ru> wrote: > 20.06.2024 15:16, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 15:07:11 +0300 > > Michael Tokarev via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >> 20.06.2024 15:03, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote: > > >> Still, it'd be nice if samba-tool domain

On Fri, 7 Jun 2024 08:50:11 +0200 "Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > on the problematic DC "systemctl status" doesn't even show > "samba-ad-dc". > > Although: > > # systemctl status samba-ad-dc.service > ? samba-ad-dc.service - LSB: Samba daemons for the AD DC > Loaded: loaded

On Mon, Jul 8, 2024 at 6:46?AM Michael Tokarev <mjt at tls.msk.ru> wrote: ... > I think the main ingredient here is to have apt-listchanges package > installed (which, while part of standard install, is optional). ... I've always installed using the netinstall.iso which does not install that package. Will add it from now on. Thank you, Chris

On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 17:24:33 +0300 Michael Tokarev <mjt at tls.msk.ru> wrote: > 05.04.2024 17:16, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 16:43:42 +0300 > > Michael Tokarev via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >> Hi! > >> > >> We had stand-alone anonymous samba server serving a read-only share > >> as

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29766 Summary: suspend-to-ram problem on GF7600 notebook Product: xorg Version: unspecified Platform: x86 (IA32) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org

05.04.2024 17:50, Rowland Penny via samba: > On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 17:24:33 +0300 > Michael Tokarev <mjt at tls.msk.ru> wrote: > >> 05.04.2024 17:16, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >>> On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 16:43:42 +0300 >>> Michael Tokarev via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi! >>>> >>>> We had

Hi! Should replication between two Samba DCs Just Work after joining a second DC to the domain? We always were running a single DC (historically it was just a single server anyway), now I've added another DC, located in a remove office, but there's no replication of any kind. Should it be configured somehow? The initial data seems to be copied fine at the time of domain join, but no

FWIW, I looked at the settings in our domain (all of which I did myself). I used to explicitly set up ntp time sources in our network for all windows workstations before, and I continued to provide these after conversion from nt4-style domain to samba AD-DC. The NTP records are provided by DHCP, and are configured in the GPO, both with regional differences (choosing the local NTP servers within

20.06.2024 15:16, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 15:07:11 +0300 > Michael Tokarev via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> 20.06.2024 15:03, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote: >> Still, it'd be nice if samba-tool domain leave displayed some more >> appropriate error message, and no insecure-password-on-command-line >> warning

On 29.07.2015 21:34, Nux! wrote: > Yes, you can. > In fact you can use the binaries from the ovirt repo itself, no need to rebuild. Thank you! In fact - I can't use raw binaries from the ovirt repo itself, because these qemu-kvm binaries contains one bug, which is already fixed in Debian: If you want to migrate Windows from hardware node to VM using CentOS 7.1 on hardware node and

On Sun, 11 Aug 2024 10:29:14 +0300 Michael Tokarev <mjt at tls.msk.ru> wrote: > 11.08.2024 00:53, Franta Hanzl?k via samba wrote: > > > I have about the same crash on Fedora 40 x86_64/bind-9.18.28 and > > Samba 4.20.4 (own build with internal Heimdal, as Fedora build it with > > MIT Kerberos - which (IMO) not stable yet). > > What is not stable with

07.07.2024 16:05, Sonic via samba wrote: > On Fri, Jul 5, 2024 at 3:55?AM Michael Tokarev via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > ... >> Please don't suppress *NEWS* entries. > ... > > As someone that was bitten by this change I have to admit I've never > seen these NEWS entries, or never realized I had. My Debian servers > are cli only (no X or

10.04.2023 21:38, Elias Pereira via samba ?????: > Hi, > > Any ETA for the inclusion of 4.18.x in bullseye-security? There will be no 4.18.x on bullseye or bullseye-backports. Maybe bullseye-backports-sloppy but very unlikely too. /mjt

31.08.2023 20:10, Aaron de Bruyn via samba wrote: > It doesn't appear to be affecting anything in our environment, but a vendor recently insisted on "seeing" the security properties on a share. > > When we right-click on a particular share, go to properties and then click on the security tab, explorer crashes and reloads. > > I tested on a few Windows 10 and 11 boxes

07.12.2023 22:22, David Bean via samba ?????: > I have a semi working 32-bit build of Samba 4.11.0 for Windows based on a patched Cygwin 2.5.2 build. I wondered if anyone knows where a set of DIF files to move it from release 4.11.0 to the latest stable release of 4.19.x (or through each intervening release to that point) could be obtained. I would like to apply changes incrementally to this