similar to: Slight OT

This is from Sean Covel: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- parsefw is a C program to parse Shorewall (netfilter) logfiles and display them in a pretty format similar to the old ipchains format. Some text is added about certain well-known destination ports, and they are linked to a FIREWALL FAQ website for further explaination. The original parsefw.c was

http://www.hanselman.com/blog/ScottGuMVCPresentationAndScottHaScreencastFromALTNETConference.aspx In Scott Guthrie''s talk (about 43:30) he mentions requiring the render call as a convention. Interesting to see Merb influence Microsoft. :) -- Cheers, Kevin Williams http://kevwil.com/ http://www.almostserio.us/ http://kevwil.jaiku.com/

On 12/16/2016 12:22 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of geo >> Sent: den 15 december 2016 12:32 >> To: centos at centos.org >> Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT: Blank mails from this list <<>> >> read my sig, then install thunderbird. > > LOL! > }} glad you enjoyed.

We are drafting a plan for a new office setup. The users will be using Cisco 7940 phones registered to a remote Asterisk server. We were thinking of using two ADSL lines coming into a Multi-WAN router to allow for load balancing. As opposed to setting up half the users on one ADSL line, half on the other. It would seem that this could cause a problem where a given phone could be registered out

On 12/15/2016 05:13 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of >> geo.inbox.ignored >> Sent: den 15 december 2016 11:28 >> To: centos at centos.org >> Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT: Blank mails from this list >> >> >> >>> Ok, can view the source now. >>>

On Fri, December 16, 2016 4:15 am, geo.inbox.ignored wrote: > > > On 12/16/2016 12:22 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote: >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of geo >>> Sent: den 15 december 2016 12:32 >>> To: centos at centos.org >>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT: Blank mails from this list >

On 12/16/2016 07:29 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > On Fri, December 16, 2016 4:15 am, geo.inbox.ignored wrote: <<>> >> btw; do you know Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu? her department >> is near what you had marked on chigo map. > > I'm a boy ;-) (yes, some names are weird) > }} aware that Valeri is 'both ways'. 8=) did not know which

Greetings all- My apologies for the slightly OT post. My primary production platform *IS* CentOS 5.x with a minor scattering of 4.x machines behind firewalls here and there... I find that I'm being placed more and more into a 'quasi-developer' role which strays some from my normal system/network admin duties. Specifically, having to work with the deep internals of make, autoconf,

at one time, a long while back, kde dt had a 'tea timer' applet for the 'system tray'. do not need to time tea, but do have need for a timer for other uses. anyone know of an app that will run in 'system tray'? tia. -- peace out. tc,hago. CentOS GNU/Linux 6.8 KDE 4.3.4 g . =+= Tired of having your microsoft os hacked? Change to Linux os, used by microsoft

On 12/04/2016 12:32 AM, geo.inbox.ignored wrote: > read 'announce' of new release for firefox-45.5.0, then for firefox-45.5.0, > decided, wrongly, to upgrade. my bad. nothing but problems. <> > 3 questions; > > 1- anyone else having problems with 45.5.1? > > 2- where might i find earlier releases of 40.x? > > 3- if i install 40.x in path

On 12/08/2016 08:04 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 12:46:43PM -0600, geo.inbox.ignored wrote: >>> 2- where might i find earlier releases of 40.x? >>> >>> 3- if i install 40.x in path /var/lib/yum/plugins/local/, >>> will i be able to roll back. >> >> any offers for questions 2 & 3? > > Short answer:

Happy Holidays to all centos devs and users. -- The important thing is not to stop questioning. - Albert Einstein CentOS GNU/Linux 6.8 KDE 4.3.4 peace out. tc,hago. g . =+= Tired of having your microsoft os hacked? Change to Linux os, used by microsoft hackers. =+= If Bill Gates got a dime for every time Windows crashes... ...oh, wait. He does. THAT explains it! =+= in a world with out

read 'announce' of new release for firefox-45.5.0, then for firefox-45.5.0, decided, wrongly, to upgrade. my bad. nothing but problems. on opening what moz devs considered as 'latest and greatest', found that it was more crapola from moz devs. first run was to login with my isp, only to find page would not fully load and a message bar saying; Firefox prevented this page from

On 12/15/2016 02:44 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Sorin Srbu >> Sent: den 15 december 2016 08:16 >> To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> >> Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT: Blank mails from this list >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From:

My home lan is 192.168.174.240/29 so that I have 192.168.174.240 as net, 192.168.174.247 as broadcast and space for 6 hosts (have 2 PC and one router). Now I would like to edit the rfc1918 file in order to exclude this range from the list. What is the way to compute the most compact notation to say that only 192.168.0.0-192.168.174.239 and 192.168.174.248-192.168.255.255 are to be discarded

On Tue, 2015-09-22 at 18:52 -0400, Fred Smith wrote: > well, not 2222, but another port I won't identify here, and it > is forwarded to 22 on my linux box. Could an 'idea' also be to close permanently port 22 and configure SSH to use a completely different port ? Inviting hackers by having a functioning, in one way or another, port 22 is asking for trouble. -- Regards,

Hi, This issue might be a slightly offtopic, but someone might have experience with it. Thanks for reading this post anyway. I have the following setup: Network 10.227.7.X is connected over a wlan (172.1.1.1 <-> 172.1.1.2) to network 128.1.1.X. This setup works, I have cross-subnet browsing going and I am able to login. When I enable IPSEC (raccoon (linux <-> freebsd)) I am still

Cheers, This is fairly OT, but if this list doesn''t know, I''m under cross fire for a reason, yet to be found... ;) One of my firewalls gets hit by *lots* of packets from random source IPs and varying source ports. Measured by thumb, it''s more frequent than 1 per second -- thus rendering the log file almost useless [1]. Does anyone know, which apps use UDP port 8497

On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 03:32:21AM +0100, Always Learning wrote: > > On Tue, 2015-09-22 at 18:52 -0400, Fred Smith wrote: > > > well, not 2222, but another port I won't identify here, and it > > is forwarded to 22 on my linux box. > > Could an 'idea' also be to close permanently port 22 and configure SSH > to use a completely different port ? > >

having problem with http://www.watchfree.to loading full page and site selections. listings of various sites showing links no longer completes. open http://www.watchfree.to, center image to open in new page with various sites no longer works. listing is now blank. anyone else having problems -- The important thing is not to stop questioning. - Albert Einstein CentOS GNU/Linux 6.9 -- KDE