similar to: [networkupstools/nut] Project Release Cycle Plan Needed (Issue #1769)

It seems the `libmodbus` library or headers were not found, or something similar - so the driver against it was not built. Did you install `libmodbus-dev` before the build? What does `config.log` in the build root say (and.or the summary shown after you run the `configure` script)? On Sat, Sep 16, 2023 at 7:46?PM FatGear <fatgear1 at free.fr> wrote: > Hi, > > I don't know what

Hello there, I don't think that's working,? I have done all your repo but i don't know how it's supposed to work. I have a idea, change vendor id and product id? to make the driver try to connect to the ups, what do you think of that ? With this driver maybe : usbhid-ups FatGear Le 16/09/2023 ? 20:40, Jim Klimov a ?crit?: > It seems the `libmodbus` library or headers were

Hello There, I tried your advice and i don't think it works either, See the logs, " /tmp/nut# ./drivers/usbhid-ups -DDDDDD -d1 -s test -x port=auto -x vendorid=... -x productid=... -x subdriver=... Network UPS Tools - Generic HID driver 0.52 (2.8.0-2557-g81fca30b2) USB communication driver (libusb 1.0) 0.46 ?? 0.000000??? [D3] main_arg: var='port' val='auto' ??

<facepalm ;)> the ellispis "something=..." were supposed to be replaced by your device ID numbers, etc. On Sat, Sep 23, 2023, 18:26 FatGear <fatgear1 at free.fr> wrote: > Hello There, > > I tried your advice and i don't think it works either, > > See the logs, > > " > > /tmp/nut# ./drivers/usbhid-ups -DDDDDD -d1 -s test -x port=auto -x

Well, now that the `subdriver` option got added to `usbhid-ups` too, you can at least try that (by building again the current master). See command-line help for the subdrivers it would currently recognize, and copy e.g. the first word as the matching option, e.g.: ./drivers/usbhid-ups -DDDDDD -d1 -s test -x port=auto -x vendorid=... -x productid=... -x subdriver=... and try to lockpick your

Elio or others at Riello, can you please check out the following issue on Github? https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/530 Begin forwarded message: > > From: latimeria > Subject: [networkupstools/nut] Riello IDG400 wrong values & not powering off (#530) > Date: February 25, 2018 at 12:06:14 PM EST > > Hello, > I just changed my old UPS with a new Riello

Arnaud Quette <notifications at github.com> writes: > moving to 2.7.6 to ease 2.7.5 release, while waiting for feedback Issue 293 https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/293 is due to my misunderstanding of the upssched timers. I wrongly assumed that they were files. I now understand that they are in-memory, and that the documentation will explain this. Whether that

Hi Charles, attached there is a patch for a new version of riello drivers: Changes: - small changes in riello_usb.c and riello_ser that solved problem with UPS that not support realtime autonomy calculation (and also internal temperature); - the second problem I think is related to the first because the shutdown command that I sent to UPS by NUT monitor works without problems; Cheers, Elio

On Feb 26, 2018, at 4:58 AM, Elio Parisi <e.parisi at riello-ups.com> wrote: > > Hi Charles, > this type of UPS doesn't support realtime autonomy calculation, instead a fixed countdown must be used. > > How we can fix non supported values? If a value is not supported, the driver should not publish it with the dstate API. Dhould the driver be modified to not return

On Fri, 16 Sep 2022, Jim Klimov via Nut-upsuser wrote: > Hello all, > ? Here's a PR I want to ask community about: should NUT clients like upsc report (log!) or hide the infamous 'Init SSL without certificate > database' message? How should upsc be used in order to get SSL/TLS protection? There is no configuration file with a CERTFILE declaration. Is there some other way

On Fri, 16 Sep 2022, Jim Klimov via Nut-upsuser wrote: > Hello all, > ? Here's a PR I want to ask community about: should NUT clients like upsc report (log!) or hide the infamous 'Init SSL without certificate > database' message? How should upsc be used in order to get SSL/TLS protection? There is no configuration file with a CERTFILE declaration. Is there some other way

Hello all, Here's a PR I want to ask community about: should NUT clients like upsc report (log!) or hide the infamous 'Init SSL without certificate database' message? On one hand, it is a reminder that the setup is insecure (plaintext protocol, might be in an externally provided tunnel but we don't know that). On another, it is fairly annoying and if it does clutter

Hello all, Here's a PR I want to ask community about: should NUT clients like upsc report (log!) or hide the infamous 'Init SSL without certificate database' message? On one hand, it is a reminder that the setup is insecure (plaintext protocol, might be in an externally provided tunnel but we don't know that). On another, it is fairly annoying and if it does clutter

> When you carry out tests to ensure that the setup is working well, you will pull the power cord from the wall and wait until the UPS reaches LB. This means waiting and wasting time. You can speed up the testing by setting LB very high so that the UPS reaches it quickly. Later you can set a more reasonable value. After the first test and the NAS is restarted I had to change the setting

Dear all, I've released a first "beta" version of the rewritten website using the MoinMoin wiki (as a CMS). It's available here: http://test.networkupstools.org/ This way, the website is cuter, cleaner and more manageable. It will also allows to offer more services, and to share some more power for the website content, and software releases. It will most of all allows us to

I hope this feedback will be helpful. In the developers documentation on networkupstools.org, there is broken link to a helpful document on usb.org. I have tracked down the new location. If you could please update the link, so visitors could find their information more quickly. Here are the details: On the page: https://networkupstools.org/ups-protocols.html Under the heading:

2009/9/13 Daniel O'Connor > Hi Arnaud, > Hi Daniel, > The NUT.org domain has a gandi reservation page on it which makes it > hard to fetch NUT source files :) > > Do you know what's happening with it? > ooch. part of the registrar change I've talked about in July, I've not fully completed the NS switch! www is still reachable, but I've forgotten to

There is a storage issue with the hoster. Things should get back to normal soon... hopefully! Arno (sent from my S3... please excuse my brevity) Le 8 oct. 2014 00:22, "Paul Kenyon" <pkenyon at advancedclustering.com> a ?crit : > Hello, > > I see you're a member of networkupstools on github. Do you have any > contact with the folks who manage the website? Getting

[was: Asking hard questions about the NUT architecture] Hy Eric, 2007/5/31, Eric S. Raymond <esr at thyrsus.com>: > Arnaud Quette <aquette.dev at gmail.com>: > > doc definitely! > > As mentioned earlier, I've tried several times to start a full > > rewrite, using docbook, to produce a friendly and complete html doc. > > But the facts are that the doc

Arjen, all I don't know if there is some prohibition against it, but the packages.html link for SuSE RPMs should be changed from: http://software.opensuse.org/ To something useful that will get the site visitors to the actual rpms. For the packages that were part of the distribution: http://download.opensuse.org/distribution/ or for updated packages on build service: