similar to: iptables 1.2.5 and shorewall 1.2.8?

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68 ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-03-20 10:55 ------- This looks strange. The BUG in slab.c tells us that there is a GFP_ATOMIC missing. This means that we are allocating kernel memory from softirq context with only GFP_KERNEL. If I understand your backtrace correctly, what happens is: - you are

Is it possible to block packets based on content? I would specifically like to block the script kiddies " GET /script/*" packets from reaching my webserver. Thanks for your time, Steve

I have a linux box with kernel 2.4.22 and iptables 1.2.9 First, i patch linux kernel with Norbet Buckmuller''s .diff #cd \usr\src\linux #patch -p1 < imq-combo-debian-2.4.22.diff All correct Second, i -try to- patch iptables (following www.linuximq.net/faq.html) #cd /usr/src/linux/net/ipv4/netfilter I edit IMQ.pom-ng.patch and replace $KERNEL_DIR with /usr/src/linux #patch

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1275 Bug ID: 1275 Summary: if IPTC_DEBUG is defined, compiler reports errors Product: iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: libiptc Assignee: netfilter-buglog

The current build of iptables does not appear to include some modules. Among these are ipt_recent.so, a very handy module in deflecting the current flurry of sshd dictionary attacks. Lineox appears to have the same problem. This is because the RedHat source rpm spec file is not explicit in the kernel directory location and that omission affects these few modules. Required changes in the

Hello all- First time posting to group in 3.5 years of using Samba ;) I have a particularily odd problem that the folks over at sql-server-performance.com forums have never seen nor heard of... I am setting up an W2kAS/SQL2k active/passive cluster using Cluster Services. The MSCS requires a common domain login for installing and configuring MSCS which I have setup on my Samba 2.2.8a PDC

Hi all. On Sep 26th I decided to try and get ipp2p working on my machine that acts as a gateway for my Internet connection. This machine is running Debian. I performed the install by doing the following steps: - I installed the Debian package called linux-source-2.6.22 for my Linux kernel source and unpacked the resulting tar.bz2 file. - From the netfilter.org site I downloaded the following

Hi, I am somewhat new to R and RSPerl, but I think this particular problem has to do with RSPerl and so I am not sure if this is the right forum to ask for help. Nevertheless I am quite sure that many of you would have used RSPerl with R. My hardware platform is a Sun/Solaris V440 server running Solaris 9 operating system I use the gcc-3.4.0 compiler to compile R without any problems. My

lartc-request,hello! 　　 I find a line in tbf_change() in sch_tbf.c: ptab = xchg(&q->P_tab, ptab); Can I consider that the pointers are exchanged between q->P_tab and ptab? as following: prev=q->R_tab; q->R_tab = rtab; rtab = prev; Is my understanding righ? ======= 2002-03-23 12:01:00 you wrote:======= >Send LARTC mailing list

This patch make it possible to run udev with the latest klibc. One patch for the udev/Makefile to match the moved include/ dir. Another one for klibc's string fuctions, that are causing segfaults: strncpy.c: the while() gets n == -1 and memset() dies strncat.c: cat's only strlen(dest) count of chars from src to dest Thanks, Kay -------------- next part -------------- ===== Makefile

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116 Summary: compile error in extensions/libipt_physdev.c Product: iptables userspace Version: 1.2.8 Platform: i386 OS/Version: RedHat Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: iptables AssignedTo:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=527 Summary: the check make target has a greedy debug grep Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: unknown AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org ReportedBy:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39 Summary: can't execute 'make modules' Product: netfilter/iptables Version: patch-o-matic Platform: i386 OS/Version: RedHat Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: ip_tables (kernel) AssignedTo:

After many long hours and a lot of help from Tom I was able to get IPSEC running on kernel 2.6, here''s a step-by-step for Getting Policy match working.. Hope it helps Adding Policy Match Support to Kernel 2.6 JJ Truax jtruax at optivel dot com This is a step by step how-to for adding policy match support to a 2.6 kernel. For information on configuring IPSEC for the Kernel 2.6 see Tom

Hello, I tried to find the answer to my problem already but it is a specialised one I think because nothing was found. I previously have a ISP who was very fast ("extreme speed" service from Cable Modem) but that blocked SMTP port and some other for poor non-commercial users... And it gives dynamic addresses so no DNS at home without tricks... So I went to another

Hi iam running FEDORA, i have installed Source of iptable 1.2.9 with the patch layer7-iptables patch done with out any errors and i applied patch in kernel to the layer 7 patch and i have select the required option by doing make menyconfig done make dep make bzImage make modules make modules_install make install and rebooted with customer kernel when i type iptables -t mangle -A

I have come to realize that I don't have to have a g729a license in order to make use of an ATA-186 or 7460 connecting to another 7460. I just need to allow the codec in sip.conf. Now what ramification does that have when I dial out over one of my analog line (connected to * by a channelbank and a T100P) using my 7460 or ATA-186. The only benefit I am looking for is reduced bandwidth

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=728 Summary: ip_tables: limit match: invalid size 40!=48 Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: mips64 OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: ip_tables (kernel) AssignedTo:

Hi all Iam trying to implement "route add " using netlink. The changes are not reflected in the routing table. I have given my code and screen shots of the routing tables. Can anybody tell me is there any mistake iam making in defining the fields . or any other mistake iam commiting thanxs viji //////////////////////////////////// CODE

I''ve installed Shorewall 3.0.5 on a Debian Sarge box, and I''m attempting to route internet traffic through a couple of ISPs, and I''ve come up against some problems. The first is that one of my links is a pppoe connection to a wireless modem, and I can''t configure it to have a static IP address... therefore I can''t see how I can set up the two